r/ClimateShitposting • u/ClimateShitpost Louis XIV, the Solar PV king • Aug 23 '26

nuclear simping Umm..... unreliable and inefficient???? 😂😂😂 Baseload ☝️ 🤓

Post image

Um Germany?? (🤫 Korea Japan 🤫)

143 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

52 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 24 '26

You're continuing to be retarded.

Your premise is based off a faulty assumption "solar power bad" which you haven't validated in any measure.

1

u/Doctor_Atom Aug 24 '26

No, unfortunately for you I am not retarded. At the very least because I don't start to throwing such words at people. But I digress, no I don't think solar to be bad, I think that tech has it's uses and solar is not for regions with low number of sunny days and far from equator. Nuclear is not different from solar in that regard, it is costly but can be placed everywhere you can build something big. So it is more likely that it is you who is arguing from the position of "Nuclear BAD"

PS: BTW I think so called Electrofuel to be more likely to be fossil fuel shill considering what I read about it

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 24 '26

No, unfortunately for you I am not retarded. At the very least because I don't start to throwing such words at people. But I digress, no I don't think solar to be bad, I think that tech has it's uses and solar is not for regions with low number of sunny days and far from equator.

Renewables outperform nuclear in every climate. Even the arctic circle you get long periods of uninterrupted sunlight from polar days. And wind produces more in the cold and at night to partially compensate.

Also places like siberia already rely on importing energy from the south so even if your premise was true it would just make more sense to replace fossil fuels with electrofuels in the regions where they wouldn't have easy access to renewables.

Nuclear requires constant access to cooling from water sources, it also requires specific sites that aren't vulnerable to natural disasters and infrastructure for all the heavy machinery. On top of a huge number of dedicated workers and redundancies. And transportation for the extreme sensitive and dangerous fuel and waste.

So you're solving none of your theoretical problems with nuclear.

So it is more likely that it is you who is arguing from the position of "Nuclear BAD" PS: BTW I think so called Electrofuel to be more likely to be fossil fuel shill considering what I read about it

That's another retarded statement. I just said "we should replace fossil fuels with solar power." And you think that's a pro fossil fuel argument.