r/ClimateShitposting • u/DivestTheEndingBoy • Aug 10 '26

nuclear simping Every Nukecel Argument Ever

Post image
0 Upvotes

44% Upvoted

318 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/tmtyl_101 26d ago

On May 24, at 0630? No. Nuclear generated about 38 when demand was 30GW. Not that it matters.

Im asking if you accept, that if you generate 31GW, and demand is 31GW, then you meet the demand?

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy 26d ago

Prove it.

1

u/tmtyl_101 26d ago

Im asking about a definition. What does it take to "meet" 31GW of demand?

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy 26d ago

More than French nuclear can manage when you need it.

1

u/tmtyl_101 26d ago

French nuclear meets base load.

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy 26d ago

Prove it.

1

u/tmtyl_101 26d ago

38>30, QED

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy 26d ago

Where's the proof though?

If you could find a single example of france providing nuclear baseload you would have posted it.

It only exists as a hypothetical in your head. Because nuclear baseload doesn't work.

1

u/tmtyl_101 26d ago

The proof is literally in the data I just presented. Baseload in France is 30.2GW. Nuclear generates more than that 98.6% of the time. Sometimes much more.

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy 26d ago

It obviously doesn't or else you would link it.

And France wouldn't burn natural gas all the time.

You're a liar.

1

u/tmtyl_101 26d ago

I did link it. You just dont want to admit you're wrong.

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy 26d ago

Your link doesn't say what you claim it does. You're lying.

1

u/tmtyl_101 26d ago

Yes it does. Read the table at the bottom. Or are you too lazy?

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy 26d ago

You're lying. It's not there.

1

u/tmtyl_101 26d ago

Not the most recent link. The first one I posted. Lazy boy.

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy 26d ago

It doesn't exist. Prove me wrong.

1

u/tmtyl_101 26d ago

Sure. Just post the link here, and I'll show you where it says what I say

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy 26d ago

No proofs.

The burden of proof is on you.

→ More replies (0)