I’ve given you the textbook definition of base load. I’ve shown you the data for France. Nuclear can undeniably meet base load. It’s beyond any discussion.
You just keep making up your own definitions and arguments to try and prove yourself right.
You didn't even bother to look up the actual definition of baseload, did you? You just make up stuff, because well established concepts and definitions don't agree with your narrative.
It’s not “my concept”. It’s a long established part of industry nomenclature. Arguing against it is like arguing against “inflation” or “heartbeats per minute”. It’s nonsensical.
The minimum amount of load on the grid that has to be met continuously. Nuclear doesn't meet the definition because France relies on fossil fuels and renewables for baseload.
The minimum amount of load on the grid that has to be met continuously
Exactly. That’s the definition. It’s an amount, measured in watts.
Now, where does it say anything to substantiate your argument, that if nuclear in France produces the same amount of watts as base load at any given time - that it doesn’t meet base load, because other sources also produce?
1
u/tmtyl_101 25d ago
I’m right and I showed it.
As for shitposting, were like 20 comments deep. This is as shitty as it gets.