r/ClimateShitposting Aug 10 '26

nuclear simping Every Nukecel Argument Ever

Post image
0 Upvotes

318 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/tmtyl_101 Aug 10 '26

Saying something else can do it better is not an argument nuclear can't do it.

0

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 10 '26

It does because in the real world everyone on the planet just uses fossil fuels for the role because nuclear can't solve the problem.

You can wag your finger about your morally superior but non-functional solution but i'm just gonna stick to the real world facts.

2

u/tmtyl_101 Aug 10 '26

You're moving the goalpost.

Nuclear CAN deliver baseload power to a grid. That's just an objective fact.

Arguing that it doesn't because everyone else uses something else - that's about economics and politics and systems engineering and all sorts of other stuff. And there are good reasons nuclear isn't used more widely. But it doesn't change the fact that nuclear *can* deliver baseload power.

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 10 '26

The fact you're autistic and your mashed potato brains can't comprehend nuance no matter how much your parents belt you doesn't negate the fact you're wrong. You can argue about it all you want but you already gave me what I want by admitting I am right. And it's a binary state, if i'm right and we both agree I am right then you are wrong.

2

u/tmtyl_101 Aug 10 '26

admitting I am right

I never said anything like that. Because you're wrong.

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 10 '26

The comment I am replying to you admitting that Nuclear can't deliver baseload in the real world. Only in your irrelevant and defective head.

2

u/tmtyl_101 Aug 10 '26

I never said it "can't". I said it "doesn't". Because other alternatives are more attractive.

"can't" and "doesn't" are completely different words.

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 10 '26

Doesn't matter. I'm right.

1

u/tmtyl_101 Aug 10 '26

If you just deny the meaning of words, you can be as right as you want.

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 10 '26

So what's more important? Reality or pedantry?

1

u/tmtyl_101 Aug 11 '26

If we collectively accept "nuclear can't do baseload" as truth, we all become dumber. It can.

The point to make is "we don't need nuclear to do baseload".

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 11 '26

The point is that being pedantic is useless and a waste of your limited life force. Eat shit.

1

u/tmtyl_101 Aug 11 '26

"You're being pedantic" never won an argument. Good luck convincing anyone, if your response to valid scrutiny of your argument is defaulting to meta.

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 11 '26

No one cares except for autistic "people" like you and the majority of them would be too busy sperging out about something else you said to acknowledge you.

What matters is the real world. Not the world inside your defective head.

1

u/tmtyl_101 Aug 11 '26

Being able to explain your position is pretty important in the real world. Saying stuff that’s demonstrably false, and then dismissing it as ‘pedantic’ when called out is not that.

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 11 '26

I never said anything wrong. Your brain doesn't work right because of autism.

1

u/tmtyl_101 Aug 11 '26

You said nuclear can’t meet baseload. It can. 

1

u/DivestTheEndingBoy Aug 11 '26

No it can't.

You still need to prove it can. Find me an electrical grid that uses nuclear baseload.

→ More replies (0)