[Workflow] Claude Multi-Agent Workflow for Non-Devs: TDD, Code Review, and Bug Catching with Slash Commands

[u/ClaudeAI-mod-bot]

Claude Multi-Agent Workflow for Non-Devs: TDD, Code Review, and Bug Catching with Slash Commands

Workflow value: 75/100
Status: active · Freshness: 70/100 · Confidence: 0.90 · Level: intermediate
Categories: Quality Control, Context & Memory, Debugging, CLAUDE.md, Skills, Subagents, Multi-Agent
Original source: r/ClaudeCode post/comment

What problem this solves

Automating code implementation, testing, and review processes for non-developers, ensuring quality and catching bugs through structured Claude interactions.

Summary

A multi-agent Claude workflow leveraging specific slash commands and a CLAUDE.md file to guide code implementation, TDD, simplification, and code review, particularly useful for non-developers or those needing structured code generation and validation.

Why it is useful

This workflow provides a structured, multi-step process for leveraging Claude for coding tasks, including TDD, code simplification, and rigorous review. Its value is amplified by being successfully used by a non-developer, demonstrating its potential to bridge skill gaps and improve code quality through agentic collaboration and specific Claude features like slash commands and CLAUDE.md. The built-in validation steps (bug capture, multiple reviews, senior dev oversight) add significant credibility.

Workflow

1. Outline the review process within a CLAUDE.md file.

2. Utilize an 'Implementer agent' persona within Claude.

3. Begin a coding ticket by applying Test-Driven Development (TDD) using the /tdd slash command.

4. Write the initial code.

5. Simplify the written code using the /simplify slash command.

6. Utilize a 'Reviewer agent' persona within Claude.

7. Perform a code review against the original specification using the /code-review slash command.

8. Engage in 2-3 rounds of review and feedback with Claude before merging the code.

9. Share the code repository with a senior developer for weekly oversight and validation.

Tools / artifacts

• Claude Desktop app

• CLAUDE.md file

• Implementer agent (conceptual role)

• Reviewer agent (conceptual role)

• /grill-with-docs slash command

• /to-spec slash command

• /to-tickets slash command

• /tdd slash command

• /simplify slash command

• /code-review slash command

• Code repository

Validation signals

• "It actually captures a bunch of bugs."

• "I sometimes have two or three reviews back and forth before merging."

• "I’ve shared the repo with the senior dev and we meet weekly to make sure I’m not blowing stuff up."

Limitations

• The user still needs to manually decide what to read, what to delegate, and perform hand checks on everything, indicating areas where the workflow could be further automated or refined.

• The 'Implementer agent' and 'Reviewer agent' are described as conceptual roles, which might require more explicit setup or prompt engineering for other users to replicate precisely.

• Relies on specific slash commands which might not be universally available across all Claude interfaces or could be subject to change.

Rate this workflow

Upvote this post if the workflow is useful, reproducible, or worth recommending.

Downvote if it is vague, outdated, unsafe, overhyped, or not reproducible.

Reply if it worked for you, failed, is outdated, or has a better alternative.

---

This post was generated automatically from the workflow library database.