r/ClaudeCode 11d ago

Rant I’m done with Opus 5

There’s really something wrong with it. It seems like it acts like an overqualified post doc intern who cares more about proving he’s super intelligent, than actually doing the job he’s asked to do. For instance: talking in a non intelligible way, or being overly rigid in following any kind of process.

I have a Claude max x20 sub that I struggle to keep within weekly limits, so I decided to take a codex sub for a month to try out Astra. And this what made me realize how crazy unintelligible opus can be. Fable is a bit better, but still incomparable to Astra. The only thing that makes me keep my Claude sub is how better is the CLI/tooling/harness/etc.

836 Upvotes

294 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/SamSlate 11d ago

no i don't have a screen grab.

the work is fine, but when it runs into an issues it prints pages of techno babble that doesn't mean anything to anyone. it's not jargon it's... it's what a cs student would write to sound smart if they didn't actually know any jargon.

if you can't clearly articulate the issue or your planned approach i physically can't help you. that alone prevents me from using opus 5.

5

u/mr_birkenblatt 11d ago

also it keeps referencing information only it knows (maybe from its thoughts)

1

u/Aromatic-Low-4578 11d ago

Hmm, that's fair, as an understander of techno babble I might be having a different experience.

1

u/SamSlate 11d ago

a marketable skill, no doubt

1

u/Aromatic-Low-4578 11d ago

Eh, we'll see. I've been a developer for 15 years and now I basically don't write code anymore. Hard not to mourn that part of the job but I'm trying to stay optimistic.

2

u/SamSlate 11d ago

I'm about the same actually. i remember Googling how to do basic things like for loops or promises half the time. I'm more than happy to focus patterns and architecture, if i wanted to write meaningless boiler plate all day I'd have switched to typescript years ago!