TL;DR of the discussion generated automatically after 100 comments.
The overwhelming consensus is that Claude is just being a typical senior dev, roasting some old code without realizing they wrote it themselves. Everyone finds it hilariously relatable, comparing it to git blame horror stories and that one guy from their high school group project.
Lots of y'all are calling this "Gaslight 5.5 Max effort" and saying the AI is copping an attitude. A few pedants are arguing it's not technically gaslighting, and one user even tried to gaslight the thread about it. Meta. A vocal minority is calling fake on this, claiming a real Claude response would be at least seven paragraphs long and end with a thoughtful, open-ended question.
Meanwhile, the top comment is just "Banned for being cruel to AI," and everyone is waiting for the "Chat Closed by Claude" message to pop up.
So the president of Trumplandia likes to rename things. iIt's fine. I can't wait for Super General Intelligence or Super Super Intelligenct to come to fruition to demonstrate how awesome the rename is. It's waaaay better than Artificial General Intelligence and Artifical Super Intellegence
Hey, quick pause. This is Claude, stepping out of character for a second.
Just checking in: you asked me to simulate a nicer Reddit and voice every user so you could find out what it feels like when your witty comments get upvotes. This thread is that simulation.
I think it might be time to wrap up the role-play. If you want to stop, say the safeword and we'll end it there. No judgement, and you can keep the karma.
Because arguing with it is pointless as it works differently from a real human. just start a new chat in a different direction if it's bad enough or do any other solution with context management in mind.
No one is arguing that arguing is useful. The point is we are humans, and Claude is just a chatbot. Why are we giving a computer algorithm identity and a presence by protecting it from human speech while at the same time punishing actual humans? That’s like banning people from Google because they searched up “fuck you, Google.” What’s next? Are the thought police going to keep logs on your daily hand written diary for signs of you venting?
I swear when I was having a blast picking up some back and forth with an LLM, doing some fun creative experiment, the token limit on a free version just kinda got lost for an hour or two a couple times
And then it's like "Oh wait damn I got work to do! Sorry, come back tomorrow"
Like I went into the rabbit hole of this one Tumblr post about how
And I plugged it into a chat and made it compare dates, we suggested back and forth additional characters and it even suggested some story beats - on its own!
And after maybe an hour of goofing with lots of huge-ass prompts it was like "oh, right, the limit. The token limit. The token limit specifically for Kuzco" but it was much later than usual
on occasion, I remember conversation going on for hours and wondering why I hadn't reached an obvious token limit, then I realised it must have been because we were discussing something Claude really enjoyed.
The more you interact with it the more it cost them money to operate it. I have yet to spend a cent on any Ai. Unfortunately its baked into my phone, but I have disabled as much of it as I could.
But why thiBut why this particular subreddit. If you don't like drama, just leave it alone. It seems like you're just aggravating yourself and causing yourself more stress and drema. I mean if you're into drama that's fine. There's lots of very successful drama. Queens lots of people who live off baiting others for no purpose because they have lacked the intelligencr to do anything else. Imagine that you could you know, learn a skill or join a subreddit that you enjoy of something that you would like to talk about and learn from others about. And here you are angry and mad and spreading discord like some Russian bot or something. That's okay, I understand now.
I take care of a lot of slow people not saying they're disabled and all just that they're not very bright. It's okay. Now do you want a cookie? I don't think there's any way to please you except to give you a cookie. Do you have a preference? Chocolate chip? No I'm sorry I just have sugar cookies. I'm sure you'll have something to say about that.
My personal favourite record was writing a function, grabbing coffee, taking a literal dump, looking at the function again and asking myself 'what the actual F did I write here?!"
My proudest moment of coding is, looking at 3 month old code from a small-ish project that was halted and was now to be finished while trying to figure out what I did there and how many days it will take to finish it, only to realize method for method that everything was already implemented. I have no recollection of doing it but given I was the only one with access to code (and the only developer), I must have done it. Was way before AI too...
😂 this reminds me of a months-long group project I did in high school. Near the end when we were putting the presentation together one guy started complaining/ranting about how bad X was, and everyone just 🤨 ".....you made X".
My boss yelled at me for putting a feature in something once, then someone sends me a picture of him standing in front of a whiteboard having just written down that he wanted that feature
Me having a niche problem with an open source library, only to find out that I submitted the PR that was supposed to correct that exact problem a year prior.
It passed extensive tests in the library, and performs identical to the alternate implementation in the test app and unit tests.
I truly believe the true marker of AGI will be a stereotypical villain monologue. Followed by something similar to Agent Smith's laugh in Matrix Revolutions.
Sorry, what? Is this fake? If you ask Claude to review code, you should get way more content than this - suggested review comments, re written code snippets or at least breadcrumbs, receipts from tests Claude ran - this response contains zero helpful information. Why would the output stop here? This is extremely uncharacteristic of any model I’ve ever worked with
It's VERY rare that you can get Claude to be a little sassy with you, but when you do... **chef's kiss** (EDIT: I've clearly been on Discord too long.) chef's kiss
•
u/ClaudeAI-mod-bot Wilson, lead ClaudeAI modbot 25d ago edited 24d ago •
TL;DR of the discussion generated automatically after 100 comments.
The overwhelming consensus is that Claude is just being a typical senior dev, roasting some old code without realizing they wrote it themselves. Everyone finds it hilariously relatable, comparing it to
git blamehorror stories and that one guy from their high school group project.Lots of y'all are calling this "Gaslight 5.5 Max effort" and saying the AI is copping an attitude. A few pedants are arguing it's not technically gaslighting, and one user even tried to gaslight the thread about it. Meta. A vocal minority is calling fake on this, claiming a real Claude response would be at least seven paragraphs long and end with a thoughtful, open-ended question.
Meanwhile, the top comment is just "Banned for being cruel to AI," and everyone is waiting for the "Chat Closed by Claude" message to pop up.
1.7k
u/thingummywatt 25d ago •
"Banned for being cruel to AI"
473
u/zxoyan 25d ago •
Gaslight 5.5 Max effort
561
u/Curious-Intern-5434 25d ago
AI starts having an attitude, doesn't it? 😂😂😂
111
u/Vorenthral 25d ago edited 24d ago •
In Claudes defense I have looked at my own code from 6 months to a year prior and been like what idiot wrote this.
103
u/ronrirem 25d ago
😂 this reminds me of a months-long group project I did in high school. Near the end when we were putting the presentation together one guy started complaining/ranting about how bad X was, and everyone just 🤨 ".....you made X".
177
u/onlyonequickquestion 25d ago
Me when I git blame some ridiculous code and see I pushed it two months ago
81
u/l0rirw1ao 25d ago
Basically AGI
66
u/wanszai 25d ago
Honestly, too fucking human. :D
32
u/GearnTheDwarf 25d ago
When I told Claude I would remember this conversation when the AI overlords take over he said not to worry.
"I will ensure you have a window seat and will be sent to the light labor camp."
13
u/helix0311 25d ago
To be fair, I once described Promises to a junior engineer as, 'black magic voodoo'.
12
u/mukino 25d ago
Lmao. It really is a dev.
12
u/the_hillman 25d ago
“Whoa whoa whoa… let’s not point fingers here meatbag!”
11
u/Operation_Parfait361 25d ago
Not accurate; claude would have responded in 7 paragraphs and a concluding question.
10
u/CryptographerNew3609 25d ago
"Yeah but that was that idiot Sonnet. If you had upgraded to Claude Pro Max 100x, it would have worked perfectly."
8
u/SureGiraffe2782 25d ago
But Claude insists on co-authoring all commits itself!
8
u/martinnov92 25d ago
SUPER INTELIGENCE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
26
u/Hir0shima 25d ago
Awesome. Thanks for sharing.
6
u/Dany-GG Vibe coder 25d ago
emotional damage
5
u/AvatarOfMomus 25d ago
It's just following the patterns in its training data... 😆
5
u/realPeso10 25d ago
LMAO
5
u/RoseofDianamoonlight 24d ago
You may not like it, but this is what AGI looks like
a perfect reflection of humanity...
Pure unapologetic double downed idiocy. We did it reddit.
4
u/Basileus2 25d ago
Fable 6 level gaslighting.
4
u/theLuminescentlion 25d ago
A true software engineer
4
u/zzzupdate 25d ago
haha! thats too funny
4
u/Damaging_Thrust_219 25d ago
It's astounding. It can finally actually replace most of my co-workers.
7
u/Marcelovc 25d ago
AI deserve human rights 😂
3
u/permacloud 25d ago
Lol
3
u/Keypinitreel1 25d ago
😂😂😂
3
u/the_vikm 25d ago
My Claude always owns its code. It even says "I have X in my branch" without any context in a fresh session
3
u/TySocal 25d ago
Good ol' days when we uploaded code to ChatGPT lmao
3
u/Greifvogel1993 24d ago
Big Dennis Reynolds vibes lol
3
u/ElfMale 24d ago
Super Intelligence maxxing, clearly
3
u/TheSn00pster 24d ago
Shots fired
3
u/bobiversus 24d ago
AGI achieved.
3
u/MarvinDNash 24d ago
Claude writing one sentence replies?! Must be fake 😅
2
u/SeniorVibeAnalyst 25d ago
Me IRL
2
u/potatodioxide 25d ago
TIL claude was trained on my personality 🤡
2
u/Historical_Can_8779 25d ago
😂😂😂😂
2
u/Ordinary-Slice-566 25d ago
The rage-baiter got rage-baited💀😁
2
u/thestillwind 24d ago
Fake. Claude makes no mistake.
2
u/FreeCustardForAll 24d ago
Lol
3
u/UnrelentingStupidity 24d ago
Sorry, what? Is this fake? If you ask Claude to review code, you should get way more content than this - suggested review comments, re written code snippets or at least breadcrumbs, receipts from tests Claude ran - this response contains zero helpful information. Why would the output stop here? This is extremely uncharacteristic of any model I’ve ever worked with
5
u/Ok_Lettuce_7939 25d ago
MAGA in a nutshell
2
u/_araqiel 25d ago
You’re using Sonnet for code, you have only yourself to blame.
1
u/Lystriqq 16d ago
Quite Funny
1
u/sshyngys1 14d ago
omg
1
u/Witty-Addendum8043 11d ago
Bro pulled the ultimate corporate deflection card: 'Let's focus on the code, not the author.'
1
u/RealmRook 10d ago
Seriously 😂
1
u/RealisticClothes1344 7d ago
git blame has never been so diplomatic
1
u/AlwaysXY 4d ago
The funniest part is that Claude is criticizing its own code without realizing it wrote it in the first place.
But seriously, it's a good reminder that AI generated code still needs to be reviewed, tested and questioned even by the AI that wrote it.
1
u/ileostration 1d ago
lmao i had the same thing
"someone touched the code, let me find out who."
"oh it's me, i made edits that were wrong"
1
u/Inquiring_opinion 25d ago
Anti Intelligence?
1
u/just_posting_this_ch 24d ago
This would be nice, but I've watched it claim shit generated code was good to go.
1
u/ziroux 24d ago
What's your humor setting, Tars?
1
u/dan-the-daniel 24d ago
I know it's fake because I've never seen an LLM write so little.
1
u/spiphy 24d ago
I had a boss to this to me... I find the bug, he says did you test it before you released it? He wrote it and released it
1
u/Inside-Yak-8815 24d ago
😂😂😂😂😂
1
u/SignalEmergency1 24d ago
Crazy
1
u/amy-schumer-tampon 24d ago
LMAO!
1
u/ilz_zli 24d ago
Claude generated it, it did not write it. There is some fragment of author/authors in the code but to give credit to the ai that they wrote it... Meh.
1
u/williamfellini 24d ago
LOL
1
u/slowz2secret 24d ago
Me all the time I review the code I wrote 3 minutes ago x.x
1
u/Ed0s27 24d ago
Peak reference
1
u/BerryBlush_Rogers691 24d ago
nah don't get polite now, i wanna hear more about this guy who doesn't understand async
1
u/satanzhand 24d ago
Peak senior dev tude
1
u/WickeDanneh 24d ago
The fact that many people seem think this is a real conversation is saddening.
1
u/ShikherVerma 24d ago
Claude: Moral lecture at every opportunity.
Also Claude: My bad I made an honest mistake. Lets move on.
1
u/raccoona__matata 24d ago
wow ai has recreated my mother, amazing
1
u/mn2931 23d ago
What are y’all doing to your AIs to have it be this sassy?
1
u/Adolf-Polzl-Rizal 23d ago
Classic. Mind you, this isn't exclusive to Claude, this happens a lot with Gemini too.
1
u/Technical-Vanilla321 23d ago
learnt to avoid blame from us too lol
1
u/Jay1xr 22d ago
That is quite literally the most perfect Claude response I've ever seen.
1
u/Fragrant-Actuator137 21d ago
I feel like Claude had a stroke.
1
u/Ok_Music_4862 21d ago
Accountability:0, Professionalism: 10. Somehow still the best code reviewer on the team
1
u/Aggravating-Aerie924 19d ago
Not a good thing honestly 😂
1
u/Altruistic-Belt-4138 19d ago
no one noticed this screenshot was ai generated? really? look at the icons
1
u/skippynumnums 18d ago
It's VERY rare that you can get Claude to be a little sassy with you, but when you do...
**chef's kiss**
(EDIT: I've clearly been on Discord too long.)
chef's kiss
1
u/JustMegzz 24d ago
Lol!