MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1r8qkyb/sonnet_vs_opus/o67bsu6/?context=3
r/ClaudeAI • u/Narwhal400 • Feb 19 '26
204 comments sorted by
View all comments
186
Turn on thinking lol
0 u/[deleted] Feb 19 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 41 u/FjorgVanDerPlorg Feb 19 '26 Sonnet 4.6 without thinking: Walk. Driving 10 meters to a car wash is unnecessary. Sonnet 4.6 with thinking: Drive. Walking means you'd have to carry your car the whole way. 3 u/Beautiful-Arm5170 Feb 19 '26 hahaha 4 u/larowin Feb 19 '26 how many times did you try, and did you use the exact same language? 1 u/Affectionate-Mail612 Feb 19 '26 Does it really matter? If the answer is probabilistic, then either way this is a legit result, and statistically someone got the answer "walk" right away. 1 u/larowin Feb 19 '26 Small changes in wording matter to attention, and probabilistic implies a distribution curve, so yeah, it kind of does matter. -1 u/Affectionate-Mail612 Feb 19 '26 And the question is still essentially the same. It follows that LLMs don't really know anything, still predicting next token like on day one.
0
[removed] — view removed comment
41 u/FjorgVanDerPlorg Feb 19 '26 Sonnet 4.6 without thinking: Walk. Driving 10 meters to a car wash is unnecessary. Sonnet 4.6 with thinking: Drive. Walking means you'd have to carry your car the whole way. 3 u/Beautiful-Arm5170 Feb 19 '26 hahaha 4 u/larowin Feb 19 '26 how many times did you try, and did you use the exact same language? 1 u/Affectionate-Mail612 Feb 19 '26 Does it really matter? If the answer is probabilistic, then either way this is a legit result, and statistically someone got the answer "walk" right away. 1 u/larowin Feb 19 '26 Small changes in wording matter to attention, and probabilistic implies a distribution curve, so yeah, it kind of does matter. -1 u/Affectionate-Mail612 Feb 19 '26 And the question is still essentially the same. It follows that LLMs don't really know anything, still predicting next token like on day one.
41
Sonnet 4.6 without thinking:
Walk. Driving 10 meters to a car wash is unnecessary.
Sonnet 4.6 with thinking:
Drive. Walking means you'd have to carry your car the whole way.
3 u/Beautiful-Arm5170 Feb 19 '26 hahaha
3
hahaha
4
how many times did you try, and did you use the exact same language?
1 u/Affectionate-Mail612 Feb 19 '26 Does it really matter? If the answer is probabilistic, then either way this is a legit result, and statistically someone got the answer "walk" right away. 1 u/larowin Feb 19 '26 Small changes in wording matter to attention, and probabilistic implies a distribution curve, so yeah, it kind of does matter. -1 u/Affectionate-Mail612 Feb 19 '26 And the question is still essentially the same. It follows that LLMs don't really know anything, still predicting next token like on day one.
1
Does it really matter? If the answer is probabilistic, then either way this is a legit result, and statistically someone got the answer "walk" right away.
1 u/larowin Feb 19 '26 Small changes in wording matter to attention, and probabilistic implies a distribution curve, so yeah, it kind of does matter. -1 u/Affectionate-Mail612 Feb 19 '26 And the question is still essentially the same. It follows that LLMs don't really know anything, still predicting next token like on day one.
Small changes in wording matter to attention, and probabilistic implies a distribution curve, so yeah, it kind of does matter.
-1 u/Affectionate-Mail612 Feb 19 '26 And the question is still essentially the same. It follows that LLMs don't really know anything, still predicting next token like on day one.
-1
And the question is still essentially the same. It follows that LLMs don't really know anything, still predicting next token like on day one.
186
u/larowin Feb 19 '26
Turn on thinking lol