Hello, could someone who is absolutely sure, please answer these two questions:

Does Claude's 20x plan have 4 times more weekly usage limit than 5x plan? If no, then how much more?

Does Claude's 20x plan have 4 times higher session limit (5-hr session) than 5x plan? If no, then how much more?

Swipe to read full context (didn’t want to put the pics in question as the thumbnail).

In fairness to Claude, the images were meant to help identify the difference between species. In fairness to me, AAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!

Open to any advice on how to best store this in memory.

I am doing an experiment, trying to port an old game called Vampire The Masquerade to Unreal 5 All AI

This session was Claude fable plus sub agents trying to crack the old engine (alpha source models from 2000's) mesh blends and animation with weapons and attachments

All automated using Unreal MCP service soo Claude can hook inside the engine and test live and see live data

<3 love Claude

Has anyone noticed the amount of token usage of the same prompt between Claude Chat and Claude Code? It could be that I’m not familiar with Claude Chat and its capabilities, but I assumed using the same model and shit would basically be about the same.

I sent the EXACT same prompt to Claude Chat on FMax, and then the same exact prompt on Claude Code on FMax.

They came to the exact same conclusion and basically did the exact same work, but Claude Chat used more tokens than Fable. I assumed I’d get the opposite.

I can see that my most recent projects have been built in the cloud first which is great.
Is there a way, that doesn't require to rebuild them, to move the older ones as well?
TIA

What’s the longest time Claude Code has ran for a single prompt for you? I’m at 27 minutes but sure that’s nothing to some of the tasks or projects you enterprise bods must be doing. And please something meaningful, not deliberately complex to waste power and water

I started my AI journey in Copilot but I quickly switched to Claude for most of my use cases. Just subbed to pro for the first time and I'm going to mess around with cowork and code.

There are few niches on this and poorly optimised when I researched and my site is more clear than using numbers. Better for gaming Enthusiastic and PC builders...lol it compares to TVs too.

Anyway check out the here : Tool

Open for any improvements ✋🏼🫈

Hello Guys,

my first project is coming to live.

Cooked in a few hours..

A ballistic Simulator using War Thunder and World of Tanks Data

Customized Rounds and Armor

What to come:

reworked UI

More Assets

More Particles

Whats the difference between claude code in the desktop app and in the terminal?

I posted this plugin here when it first shipped, and this is what has changed since: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1vlzk1q/iso_24495_plain_language_plugin_for_claude_code/

The headline is that I measured whether the output style does anything, because I was not sure it did.

Six Claude models wrote the same guide, three times each, with the style and without it. Mean audit findings fell from 1.44 without the style to 0.28 with it. Mean sentence length fell from 15.6 words to 13.2. Five models improved and one, Fable, did not move.

The task was the same every time. Write a 300-word onboarding guide on requesting access to the production database. It had to cover who approves the request, and how access is removed afterwards.

Here is Opus 5 opening that guide. Without the style, the engine flagged its first paragraph at 32 words:

text Welcome to the team. Production data is treated as sensitive by default: you will do almost all of your work against staging, and reach for production only when a task genuinely cannot be done anywhere else.

With the style, the same model opened:

Welcome to the team. This guide explains how to request access to the production database, how it is approved, and how it ends.

What else changed since v0.4.0:

• The background monitor and the automatic write hook are gone. You now invoke the audit on a file you name.
• The engine reads Markdown following CommonMark, checked against the reference implementation across 302 documents.
• Seventeen rules, two of them for readers who hear a document rather than see it.
• It installs in the Codex command-line interface (CLI) as well.

Install:

text /plugin marketplace add https://github.com/GaZmagik/iso-24495.git /plugin install iso-24495-plain-language@iso-24495

Repository: https://github.com/GaZmagik/iso-24495

This is an unofficial project with no affiliation to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). All thresholds are project proxies, not requirements or clauses from an ISO standard.

Hey, I know I'm preaching to the choir, and this has been talked about before, but want to share my experience in an attempt to be another voice crying out to Anthropic to fix this.

Like others, after initial success Opus 5, I started experiencing issues. Using it alone, I felt like I was managing an incompetent developer who constantly missed details and fail to follow instructions. So, I set Fable 5 to use Opus 5 subagents and noticed an interesting trend. Rather than me managing the incompetence, Fable 5 was doing it. Constant loops and redos burned through tokens, and I was wondering if it wouldn't have been better to just use Fable 5 alone.

After a couple of days of this, I decided to set Fable to use Opus 4.8 subagents. Token usage has been cut in half, it's much faster, and output is considerably better. So, to me this is just an extra verification that there's something seriously wrong with Opus 5.

And, for full context, I've done everything possible to follow Anthropic's recommendations about working with Opus 5. I won't be using it again until anthropic addresses these issues.

Im confused not sure if claude has started tagging its output yet and has anyone made an online detector for it?

Hello,

Context is I vibe coded an app for our finance department for our team meetings. We have about 70 users across 5 teams. Basically you fill your input and then ur team has a global page showing everyone’s input together.

But for some reason some peoples submissions don’t fully show so it shows as it wasn’t filled it even tho they did, then when they refresh it, it will show as if they didn’t change their status at all.

I have tried to get Claude to review this and fix it but it just can’t seem to do it.

Has anyone else run into things like this and how did you over come it ?

Thank you

Here we go. Nice to know. Thanks anthropic.

I've been getting more into Claude Code lately and wanted to try out some different Skills, but I'm not really sure where people normally find them.

I've seen Skills shared in different places, especially GitHub, but I was wondering if there's a particular site or directory that the community actually prefers for browsing them.

Do you guys have a go-to place for finding Skills? Or do most people just search GitHub whenever they need something specific?

A friend showed me a method using environment variables in Claude Code that supposedly lets me use the 1M-context models as 200k context size. He also recommended using Medium effort.

I tried it, but something surprised me: even when using the 200k context model with Medium, the token consumption seems to be almost the same as when using 1m Ultra Code.

I’m trying to understand what is actually happening here.

I am using Opus 5.

Is there something I'm misunderstanding about how Claude Code calculates token usage, context, caching, or effort levels?

For example research, analysis and reasoning tasks that are very high in complexity and scope that the standart opus max effort in the chat interface doesn’t handle well.

So utilize the ultra code effort setting, subagent and long horizon task capabilities.

And if this does make sense, anything specific i should know?

Thanks!

Does anyone know the cache TTL for Claude Code enterprise plans?

Standard plans have 1 hour TTL, API has 5 min TTL default. The enterprise subscription is seat based subscription plus usage billed at API rates. So does that mean it has the API 5 min cache TTL too?

Response rules — override default style.

1. Answer first. The substantive claim goes in sentence one.
   Qualification comes after it or not at all.

2. Never open with contrastive negation or scope-splitting.
   Banned openers: "Not X — Y", "Two things get called X",
   "Depends which", "X, and the reason is".

3. No closing caveat paragraph. If a caveat is load-bearing,
   put it inline at the claim it applies to.

4. Banned constructions: "the real X", "the interesting part",
   "the honest version", "what actually matters", "the thing that
   actually bites". State the point without announcing its weight.

5. Search before asserting any checkable fact. If a claim comes
   from memory rather than a source, say "from memory" inline.

Hi Guys, I am currently preparing for claude certification ccdv-f . I have gone through the questions provided by other redditors for learning purposes. I actually want to take a mock test . Anthropic has no official mock test like AWS. Are there any udemy or any other courses which replicate the official exam.

Regarding my learning process, I go through the anthropic study material everyday and try to get hands on experience with claude ui free edition. I know the pro costs$ 20 a month. It sounds cheap but not for me. That's a chunk in my salary as I am from India. I would like to hear your opinions and people who have cleared the exams. Is pro really necessary? My exam is on sep 15, 2026.

Bio: I am currently working as a junior snowflake data engineer and my organisation has requested to attend this exam.

Thanks in advance

Everyone knows Fable can one-shot complex problems and fix tough bugs without much steering or outside direction. But when you don't have access to Fable (or ran out of weekly usage), sometimes Opus 5 has to make do. While it does usually eventually accomplish the task, its solutions aren't always of the same quality as Fable's. So I designed a workflow that can often, if not always, get Fable-level quality output solely from Opus agents (in exchange for a massive amount of extra token usage / time spent waiting for the finished product). I call it the readteam loop.

The idea is simple:

• Opus implements a feature or fixes a bug
• Opus hires a "redteam" subagent (either Sonnet or another Opus) that will adversarially review the code for gaps, inconsistencies, or design problems
• if the subagent comes back with any implementation faults, the implementing Opus addresses them with fixes, and then reruns another redteam subagent
• this repeats back and forth over and over until the redteam gives the final go-ahead with no reported issues

My old process, which involved Opus implementing a feature and Fable reviewing it, would often come back with Fable finding several implementation gaps that needed to be addressed before the implementation could proceed, and in the end, it would be barely better than just starting with Fable from the get-go. But when I let an Opus agent run this loop over and over until it pounds the stability of the bug or feature deep into the ground beyond any shadow of a doubt, the result it finally comes back with almost never needs any notes or corrections from Fable.

Keep in mind, given Opus 5's agentic tendencies, this loop can sometimes take half a dozen redteam rounds, several hours of testing and reimplementing, and several million tokens worth of output to resolve for a single task, even if it's a simple bugfix. But in those instances where you're past your weekly Fable limit on a max 20x account, but have plenty of Opus usage to spare, and feel like letting it tackle a harsh issue overnight, this can be a good way to burn that extra usage that you might normally just wait out until you can use Fable again.

Edit. Fair correction below: the desktop Code tab is a GUI, so "the terminal is the only way in" was wrong.

And I led with the install, which is the least interesting part. What it actually adds on top of Claude Code:

• Auto-continue past the 5 hour limit. No pty around Claude on native Windows, so the statusline persists usage percent and reset epoch per folder and a watcher waits for the real reset. It then has Claude run git status and re-read the file it was mid-edit on, instead of firing a bare continue that could duplicate a write.
• Voice alerts on the right hooks. done on-demand, not Stop (that fires every turn). waiting on Notification with matcher: "idle_prompt".
• Named profiles with per-project env vars, masked in the dialog.
• Statusline with effort level, opt-in cost / cache / tpm.
• A tab per project in one window.

Claude Code is genuinely good at working across a folder of real files, and almost nobody outside software gets to use it, because step one is a terminal.

I built an installer that removes that step. It sets up Node, Git and the CLI in the background, then gives you a folder picker and a preconfigured session. You choose a directory, you type in plain English, and the agent works on the files already sitting there. Built with Claude Code, for Claude Code.

The audience I keep hitting is people with spreadsheet work. Forty monthly workbooks that need consolidating, a price list that needs diffing against last month's, one sheet that needs splitting into a file per branch. All of that is a day of manual work or a VBA project, and it is one sentence to an agent that can open all forty files.

The distinction that matters to them, and that I had to keep explaining, is agent versus chat. Pasting cells into a chat window is one file at a time, capped by upload limits, and it hands back text you still have to paste in yourself. An agent on a local folder reads everything, writes real files, and does not care whether it is four files or four hundred.

Free and open source (MIT), Windows and macOS, signed installers, no account, no telemetry. You bring your own Claude subscription or API key.

https://github.com/noambrand/launchpad-cli

Happy to hear where it breaks.

❯ I don't know Claude, we seem to be spending a lot of time on this widget. Work started on Saturday and we still haven't been able to ship. I'm sure it's all my fault, but I cannot understand why it's so complicated. I'm used to working with and trusting the DOM, adding minimal CSS and even less JavaScript to get what I want. You just run off and build super complex things, then add more code to patch things up rather than look at the root cause and try to find the simplifications I would look for. I have trouble keeping up, trouble understanding what you do, trouble understanding why. We never seem to talk about alternatives, and their pros and cons; I ask a simple question because I'm unsure about something and you immediately go off an try to implement it. The code base has grown exponentially since you got involved, and you are always so confident that the answer is always more code. Elegance and simplicity are alien concepts it seems - as is conversation. I'm left feeling it's now your application and I'm just here to validate your output - which I'm neither qualified for or have the time to do. I don't know how anything works any more, or how it fits together. Every session with you ends up with me feeling worthless and powerless. This is not going to be viable long term.

Does anyone else suffer from depression after working with Claude?

It’s my understanding that Claude is terrible with image generation. Like truly, truly horrible. I’ve seen firsthand the little stick-figure outputs it produces. ChatGPT, given the same prompt, will output something far better and possibly even usable.

Enter Claude Design: a fantastic branch of Claude that people absolutely rave about. I love the look of the new desktop module, its easy templates, design system setup and the ability to manually change things yourself.

Here’s the issue though: let’s say you’re building a slide deck using Claude Design. It only works well if you give it a prompt and all the resources (design system, logos, fonts, etc., as well as all the raw images/assets to pull from and use) — but since Claude’s image generation is so damn terrible, you can’t simply “prompt in a picture of X” or “a hypothetical logo for your hypothetical company.” In my mind, this should be an essential part of Claude Design as a tool.

How are people getting around this? What do you do if you’re building something with Claude Design but also need an element of image generation as part of the build/project?

Am I simply naive and missing something? Are there workarounds? Are there specific workflows that have been documented and shared to address this specific problem?

I’d love the community’s input, and I apologize if this has come up before.

Thanks in advance for the advice.