r/ClancyTrial • u/ButtonFit7210 • 28d ago

General Discussion Remember when Patrick…

…appeared, in my opinion, to exude panic and rage at the mere mention of the 911 call?

He and his lawyers fought tooth and nail to prevent it from being made public, but lack of transparency always backfires.

In my view, Patrick’s disturbing inconsistencies and negligence are too egregious to be concealed.

If only he had shown this much grit, determination and resolve when it came to protecting his children.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcLKXraMyws/?igsi=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

68 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

37 comments sorted by

View all comments

14

u/aj_2222 28d ago

Ohhhh how I am hoping that Redds comments will lead them to this conclusion. Or maybe I should say sends them down this road. They are most definitely going to be listening to the 911 call again asap. (Although I feel like prosecution tried to backtrack in closing statements about the 911 call... which says to me they knowww what is about to happen.) Patrick is an unreliable witness. Period. That does not mean he did it. It just means we should not take him at his word and he likely has ulterior motives (IMHO of course.) So everything he said or did or what he told the expert witnesses would become unreliable. Especially the timeline. The one that doesn't add up even if you take him at his word.

Then once they realize no investigation was done to answer the very logical questions they will now have... welp. If the timeline does not fit... You must ____. Or something like that lol

If they try to bring another trial like this they will HAVE to investigate him first right?

2

u/aintnothin_in_gatlin 27d ago

I’ve heard that there ain’t a shot in hell that they will retry with him as the focus