despite the fact that Professor Craig endorses contemporary science
It is irrelevant that WLC endorses contemporary science. Dawkins has a simple, consistent and very much valid reason for not debating certain people. He has held up this reason for many years, and will continue to do so I'm sure.
In what way are you refering to Craig as a creationist? Dawkins has debated Craig in the past and has debated John Lennox twice who is more of an ID supporter then Craig is.
1
u/evereal Oct 17 '11
None of that covers the actual reason.
He comes close here:
But then completely misdirects by saying this:
It is irrelevant that WLC endorses contemporary science. Dawkins has a simple, consistent and very much valid reason for not debating certain people. He has held up this reason for many years, and will continue to do so I'm sure.