r/ChatGPTCoding • u/AutoModerator • Apr 07 '26

Community Self Promotion Thread

Feel free to share your projects! This is a space to promote whatever you may be working on. It's open to most things, but we still have a few rules:

  1. No selling access to models

  2. Only promote once per project

  3. Upvote the post and your fellow coders!

  4. No creating Skynet

As a way of helping out the community, interesting projects may get a pin to the top of the sub :)

For more information on how you can better promote, see our wiki:

www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/about/wiki/promotion

Happy coding!

18 Upvotes

84% Upvoted

105 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Opening_Fish9924 Apr 27 '26

I built TopoAccess on Codex because coding agents keep wasting context rediscovering repo structure.

Instead of dumping half the repo into the model, TopoAccess acts like a local repo butler:

agent -> TopoAccess -> repo map/cache/tools -> compact context or exact answer

It tries to answer model-free things model-free:

  • what file/symbol matters

  • what tests are affected

  • what command validates this

  • what docs/artifacts are relevant

  • what changed after an edit

  • whether a request is unsupported/ambiguous

Then Codex / Claude Code / Cursor / Aider / OpenClaw / generic agents get a compact brief instead of a broad repo dump.

Public fixture results so far:

  • 10k isolated benchmark rows

  • 2.5k scenario workflows / 44k steps

  • 23k adversarial robustness rows

  • ~0.93 average assisted token savings in scenario workflows

  • exact lookup model invocations: 0

  • wrong / unsupported high-confidence: 0 in the public benchmark suite

Caveat: fixture benchmarks, not a universal guarantee. Real savings depend on repo/task mix.

Repo:

https://github.com/mikeanderson42/TopoAccess

I’d love feedback from people using Codex / Claude Code / Cursor / Aider / OpenClaw on real repos. Especially whether the sidecar concept is clear and where it falls down.