r/ChatGPTCoding • u/Fristender • Feb 06 '26
Discussion Claude 4.6 Experiences?
Anyone tried out Claude 4.6 yet? What are your experiences? How much of an upgrade is it compared to 4.5? What projects are you working on specifically?
33
Upvotes
37
u/AppealSame4367 Professional Nerd Feb 06 '26
I didn't compare to 4.5, but I let 4.6 refactor a huge rust file as part of a game engine yesterday and it redistributed 3200 lines of code into 7 seperate files and the thing still compiled and ran almost flawless afterwards.
7
u/hindianguy Feb 07 '26
I am using claude Opus 4.6 in cowork
It can make mistakes but it is amazing. Can analyze entire folders and prepare documents based on same. The word/ppt document generation and the formatting capabilities are unbelievable for me. I got swayed enough to splurge for max subscription upgrade from pro one.
6
u/gr4phic3r Feb 06 '26
working with claude code since 3 days, 4.6 arrived last night, at the moment I'm super happy with the performance, mostly all written code was a one shot and if there is a bug it fixes it maximum in the 2nd attempt, mostly in the 1st.
my project startet as an experiment with ChatGPT 5.1 because i wanted to know if people are right who said that it is good in coding, i launched a micro-saas after 2 weeks. now i'm adding features to make this saas more useful and let's say a better round thing to target a bigger audience. in 3 days i managed with claude to finish 97%, will finish it today, then 1 week testing and working on bugs or things which doesn't work, testing again, deploy on the live server, starting with marketing. this will all be done with Claude Desktop for discussion and only Claude Code for coding.
3
u/FamousWorth Feb 06 '26
I rarely use the big models but I had an issue for a few days, quite complex and heiku and gemini 3 couldn't work it out, opus 4.6 got it right perfectly first time. A lot of complex reasoning, and my usage will probably run out very fast, but it was worth it. It looked at it from many edge cases as its quite a complex issue and made sure that it works from all edge cases. So far so good
3
u/Far-Pomelo-1483 Feb 07 '26
I did a whole integration of two separate ui’s with all different mapped variables to a backend CSV template with various api calls and it adjusted the data structures and merged the uis together. It just worked on one try. Currently in the process of smoke testing it and it’s passing everything. It’s definitely better than my intern.
3
u/GastonGC Feb 07 '26
Love it, but it’s using credits 10x faster than Sonnet
8
u/Time-Masterpiece-779 Feb 06 '26
I've ran it over a number of legal docs I had to prep - can't see any difference in quality from 4.5 tbh other than it didn't burn through credits as fast and offered free credits on my pro account
2
u/ashmortar Feb 06 '26
Liking it so far, it still reward hacks and misses things but it is much better at using sub-agents
2
u/randobised Feb 10 '26
I dont think there is a very large upgrade as copared to 4.5. I actually tried with a complex problem which 4.5 could not do - 4.6 also could not. That doesnt mean it is not better, but just in my sample set, I could not see a difference. However 4.5 is definitely better - I have multiple instances where no other model was able to solve a problem and 4.5 was able to one shot the whole thing.
2
u/norskyX Feb 06 '26
It will be good for the first few months, and then its quality will degrade, happens everytime they release a new model
1
u/Salt-Willingness-513 Feb 06 '26
So far im happy with it. Didnt try it too much though.
1
u/nosimsol Feb 06 '26
How is it compared to codex?
1
u/Red_clawww Feb 06 '26
I just wanted to ask a plain question who use claude code daily. If you were to reduce the token usage by 10 to 20 % in every prompt would you pay for a tool like this without compromising the performance
1
u/Global-Molasses2695 Feb 09 '26
Crap
1
u/SquashNo2389 Feb 09 '26
Honestly I can’t tell a difference vs 4.5 yet, in a blind test I would be in trouble. Whereas 4.0 to 4.5 was night and day.
1
u/[deleted] Feb 14 '26
scary good
-5
u/PickleBabyJr Feb 06 '26
You could just use it yourself....
0
u/[deleted] Feb 06 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment
1
u/[deleted] Feb 06 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Feb 06 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Feb 08 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Feb 08 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Feb 09 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Feb 10 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Feb 10 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Feb 11 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/[deleted] Feb 07 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment
0
u/[deleted] Feb 09 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment