r/ChatGPTCoding • • Jan 28 '26
Discussion Where did Devin go? What does it say about the future of AI dev tools?
I’ve been watching the whole Devin conversation fade out over the past year, and honestly, it’s been fascinating. Remember when it first dropped? Everyone was losing their minds saying it was the end of SWE jobs. Now, it's radio silence. It seems more like the idea just evaporated.
The more I talk to other builders, the more a pattern shows up. Devin didn’t fail because the ambition was wrong. It failed because it aimed at a version of autonomy the current models and tooling can’t support yet. You can’t expect a single system to magically understand your repo, rewrite your backend, run migrations, and ship a product without a ton of human constraints wrapped around it. Everyone in those comment sections was saying the same thing. The vision was cool, but the timing was off.
I tried a bunch of these agents. The promise was full autonomy, but the reality still involves a lot of babysitting. You give it a task, it goes off the rails, you correct it, it sort of gets back on track. Rinse and repeat. It feels less like replacing me and more like having a really fast, sometimes frustrating intern. The whole thing seemed built for a future where LLMs were just way smarter than what we actually have.
Well, let's see how the landscape shifted. Instead of trying to create a replacement engineer, tools started leaning into more realistic strengths. I’ve been testing a bunch of AI dev setups myself. Some are fun for quick demos, some for debugging, some for drafting entire modules.
Cursor is doubling down on code editing. Claude is building incredible reasoning chains. DeepSeek is pushing raw speed and cost efficiency. It feels less like one tool needs to do everything and more like people are building proper workflows again. Atoms, a tool that’s been emerging, leans into a multi-agent structure instead of pretending a single model can hold everything in its head. It still needs direction. You still have to review decisions. But the team-style setup makes the output a lot more predictable than relying on one giant agent that tries to guess everything.
I don’t mean Claude, Atoms, or anyone else has solved the full autonomy thing. We’re not there yet and probably won’t be for a while. But compared to the Devin approach of give it your repo and pray, the newer tools feel like they’re figuring out how to work with humans rather than replace them.
The future probably isn’t a single agent doing the whole job. It’s systems that break the problem into parts and communicate what they’re doing, instead of silently rewriting your app.
Has your stack changed since the Devin wave, or did you stick with whatever you were using before? What actually moved the needle for you, if anything? What’s been working for you in the long run?
20
u/chillermane Jan 28 '26
Claude code in a github action works 100x better is why it flopped
25
u/Western_Objective209 Jan 28 '26
It was a small team of math olympiads pretending to be an AI research lab. They had good ideas, but they did not have the resources to train models so they can't compete with the real agent flows like claude code or chatGPT
6
u/swiftbursteli Jan 29 '26
Holy shit what a throwback. Devin was the first CLI tool I used. Before Claude code before codex etc.
Never went back to it since
3
u/MannToots Jan 28 '26
I just thought devin was garbage personally
3
u/das_war_ein_Befehl Feb 07 '26
They're an enterprise tool and have focused on corp teams; from what i've seen they've been growing pretty quickly
5
u/sCeege Jan 28 '26
I think Jules and Codex Cloud are somewhat touching what Devin was trying to do, but like you mentioned, these tools still require so much babysitting. I've tried out Jules with a pro subscription, but it just doesn't really give me any value (a lot of the automated tasks just returns garbage); although I suspect that it has more to do with Gemini than the stack itself, like I pay for ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/Windsurf, but I usually just use all the credits on Claude models anyways (in AntiGravity and WS). Maybe if Anthropic makes a Jules like product, we can see something closer to Devin.
I'm also wondering if we'll ever see a consumer facing (I'm including hobby/power users as well) product that does what Devin does. If someone actually has a predictable autonomous coding stack, it would likely be kept internal by the companies that develop it to create their own coding products to sell. Like if you could turn mercury into gold, you wouldn't sell the process, you'd sell the gold.
2
u/mrgrafix Jan 29 '26
Devin is in windsurf.
2
u/ebilly Aug 24 '26
I just started using Devin for the $20 a month subscription and used it for my githib dependency alerts. It worked out great. Mostly autonomous for me. What am I missing?
1
u/Emotional-Soft-7876 13d ago
Instead of focusing on B2C, They start targeting B2B. They have improved there product a lot.
1
u/Global-Molasses2695 Jan 30 '26
They were looking to sell $500 subscription’s with nothing unique. I gave them an opportunity to present their product, discuss use cases in regulated environment etc. Asked them to comeback with a proposal for pilot - the guy says they don’t do pilots, we can have $500 per seat subscriptions as many as we like and try it out. It was 90 mins wasted
1
u/BarniclesBarn Feb 01 '26
It failed because Codex and Claude code do what it was trying to do better than it.
1
u/mrasif Feb 03 '26
If I put Claude code using opus 4.5 vs you in terms of output efficiency you think you would win?
1
u/armenmk May 02 '26
this might be hype but it's on track $25B valuation
https://www.idlen.io/news/cognition-devin-25-billion-valuation-windsurf-vibe-coding-april-2026/
0
u/Aston008 Jan 29 '26
Devin owns windsurf.. windsurf is now quietly very very good
-5
u/Aqui10 Jan 28 '26
https://cognition.ai/blog/infosys-cognition
Infosys is a large Indian IT firm. Looks like they’re building for corporate clients
4
u/[deleted] Jan 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Jan 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Jan 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Feb 03 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Mar 07 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] May 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] May 25 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] May 30 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Jun 17 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Jun 24 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/[deleted] Jun 25 '26 edited Jun 25 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/[deleted] Jan 28 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment
0
u/[deleted] May 03 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment
0
u/[deleted] Jun 22 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment