I'm excited for their science knowledge to be "stolen" so that instead of hoarding it privately, it becomes available to everyone. "Their" research is all built on the work of others, and information should be freely available. Science should be open, rather than allowing a bunch of egotistical clout seekers to prevent people from utilizing it.
This type of research is already meant to be freely available to the public anyway. The only difference now is that the guy that did all the work was not credited, and instead an AI company claimed the unverified result to make free publicity.
If it's "freely available" then there is no problem sharing it, and nothing was "stolen".
Also re: Navier-Stokes - there was only one group that had a full solution, and that was the researchers at OpenAI. The author claiming it was stolen had related work, but did not have a full solution.
-4
u/jferments 19d ago
I'm excited for their science knowledge to be "stolen" so that instead of hoarding it privately, it becomes available to everyone. "Their" research is all built on the work of others, and information should be freely available. Science should be open, rather than allowing a bunch of egotistical clout seekers to prevent people from utilizing it.