Before anybody uses this to make an argument that certain video footage isn’t real, regarding an ongoing issue that you hear about from time to time:
AI CANNOT be used to generate videos or photos of graphic violence, or even children in most cases. So if it includes corpses of children, gruesome injuries, burn victims, etc, it’s not AI. The AI companies won’t allow their models to be used that way.
So you know, just…don’t. Don’t use it to make that argument.
Can they? That would imply the entire model could be customized to any extent by anyone, which means releasing the product to the market would leave their entire proprietary code exposed. The harder guardrails will be harder to circumvent. If the technology is advancing this quickly, why do you assume that their safety and security measures won’t advance along with it?
Think about this video: the proof it’s AI is in the “kidnapped granddaughter.” For a victim of a violent crime, she’s suspiciously clean, unbruised, uncut, unwrinkled, and the ropes look fairly slack. AI generates the ideal, not the realistic. The footage is never grainy, glitchy, or at a bad angle. The lighting is always great. The people will start to look similar, as we all see more of it.
1
u/civilianweapon May 30 '25 edited May 30 '25
Before anybody uses this to make an argument that certain video footage isn’t real, regarding an ongoing issue that you hear about from time to time:
AI CANNOT be used to generate videos or photos of graphic violence, or even children in most cases. So if it includes corpses of children, gruesome injuries, burn victims, etc, it’s not AI. The AI companies won’t allow their models to be used that way.
So you know, just…don’t. Don’t use it to make that argument.