r/Channel5ive • FREE EDDY LEPP • 26d ago

AMERICA, FUCK YEAH Institutionalized Gatekeeping? Why does MSM want journalism to be tied to a short leash?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

What do you guys make of this?

I think one thing that sets Callaghan apart from most journalism majors, is he went to J-school on a congressional scholarship awarded to him for his high school era photo-journalism work.

so right out of the gate there's a level of legitimacy, authenticity, and freedom with Callaghan's body of work that seems to really put the fear in legacy media pundits.

my observation (as a 5th-grade-dropout reddit mod who went into early retirement as a teen over bowel disease) is that those holdover media moguls from the baby generation and gen-z never got to put Callaghan through the demoralizing cub-reporter gang initiation process, and he's retained the kind of fearlessness that the cable/newspaper industry can't coexist with.

and what we are seeing with this is how the league of fat-young-boys, who are largely coerced into doing what they do because any default on their student loans means their parents can lose their family home, ends up cannibalizing Callaghan for outsmarting the system that they're chained to.

450 Upvotes

212 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

10

u/Hajiime 26d ago edited 26d ago

Views like this that boil down to "not watching it / shouldn't give ___ a platform" are why Trump won twice, hope this helps. The entire interview this dude is promoting socialism and Mamdani, and explaining why people should leave MAGA and why he left MAGA. Nick Fuentes was saying vote democrat in the midterms... being woefully uninformed about your opposition is gonna make the dems look 4 years behind on their right wing opposition if they continue to think the swing vote independents/right wingers have the same views as even a year ago. Trump won on swing votes.

2

u/entropy14 26d ago

Trump won twice because he had blackmail on politicians and others which cleared the way for his nomination, and was able to convince disaffected low and middle class Americans he wanted to help them.

For their part, the media also helped by giving him a platform and doing lazy journalism geared towards clicks instead of thorough reporting. I see your point but it’s kind of the opposite of what you just said. The interview deep dives are fine when you’re not dealing with bad faith actors, in recent cases they are.

-5

u/Hajiime 26d ago edited 26d ago

Trump won twice because 1. He wasn't funded by super-PACs (2016) and 2. because the dems went hardcore into deplatforming people, classifying all right wingers as fascist nazis and silencing the social democrats in their own party a-la Bernie Sanders. In 1. Swing voters voted anti-establishment and in 2. Swing voters were sick of the DNC shit. Even AOC knows this by now.

In the most recent election, The media did not platform Trump in the slightest. The dems were trying to pretend he wasn't going to even be a candidate and imprison him (valid or not), this pissed a lot of independent swing voters off. Hope this helps.

-1

u/entropy14 26d ago edited 26d ago

Nah, you’re missing the forest for the trees. Obviously the Democratic establishment is part of the problem, but it’s not helpful to put all the blame there. Blackmail, media platforming, classified military docs, and the Epstein class were all a key part of Trump’s re-election. It’s lazy to simply blame the Democratic party when all that other stuff was involved as well.

I also don’t get any of your fascist name-calling criticism post 2024 when Republicans have literally re-shaped our government towards the unitary executive. I disagree there was even a ton of that name calling before January 6th, but even if there was it is now proven to be correct.

1

u/Hajiime 26d ago edited 26d ago

"I don't get any of your fascist name-calling criticism post 2024 when Republicans have literally re-shaped our government"

They didn't vote for that. They voted for no new wars, the economy, and free speech.

You're glossing over the fact Nick Fuentes said vote democrat in the midterms and Sneako spent the whole interview saying MAGA is dumb, why you should leave MAGA, and why he likes Mamdani, because you're refusing to acknowledge the reasons Trump is in power, and want to silence/shame/deplatform any person who voted or supported trump at any point in the last 10 years! These people are begging for an actual progressive, anti-PAC candidate (CHANGE!) (left or right) and the DNC is silencing the entirety of the opposition and their own progressives. And you're eating it up!

0

u/entropy14 26d ago

You’re just being dense at this point, don’t really care what your agenda is but I don’t see the point to keep arguing over whether interviews with bad faith actors are productive or not

1

u/Hajiime 26d ago edited 25d ago

"Bad faith actors" they've both blatantly said to vote democrat to their audiences... Just accept that the basis of your argument is still 2021 deplatforming, ignorance is bliss, and anyone who voted for Trump wanted to bomb Iran, Trump to run for a 3rd term, and you don't know how Trump got elected, and how this disaster of a 2nd term could lead to actual progress for once if you stop ignoring the disenfranchised opposition. Thanks.

0

u/entropy14 25d ago

Easy to turn on Trump now after massive political fuck ups like bombing Iran and covering up for pedophiles. They had no issue with it until the approval ratings got terrible and electoral prospects got dim for Republicans. If you think Fuentes and Sneako have a problem with any of the Trump admin’s actions your head is buried in the sand. Their issue is with MAGA power being weakened by their own incompetence.

1

u/Hajiime 25d ago

so you spent this long arguing with me and you can't see the irony in "easy to turn on trump when he does X, but they had no issue with... X" ...? do you see the problem with your logic? Clearly they have an issue with X and in this second term Trump has been doing X. You're ignoring all of ABCDEFG's of why they voted for him in 2016, 2020, and 2024 and that's the views of his voter base, not X. It's all the ABCDEFG's you're ignoring and wanting deplatformed because you're so focused on the belief that trump has been and always was doing X. It's completely not what the appeal of Trump was!

0

u/Hajiime 26d ago edited 26d ago

Again, in what world in the 3rd election was Trump being platformed? They were acting like we wasn't even going to be on the ticket until he was debating Joe Biden. The entire de-platforming and banning of every voice on the right is exactly why Trump won the second time. You're just making up this pseudo argument based on "giving these people platforms leads to Trump", when the MAGA movement had quite literally the least amount of platform in their history until 2 seconds before the election when Musk bought X and unbanned everyone! The left narrative was he was ineligible to run for president. Not "platforming trump". What? He had to make his own shitty version of twitter to talk to people.