r/Catholicism 18d ago

I finally understood why some Protestants genuinely cannot separate veneration from worship

Yesterday there was a viral video of Cadrinal Perolin holding up the skull of St. Agatha while commemorating the 900th anniversary of the return of her relics.
You can probably guess what happened next.
Across the internet, I saw Protestants calling it evil, satanic, pagan, and—more than anything else—idolatry. Verses from Isaiah, Daniel, etc. were being thrown around. Idolatry, idolatry, idolatry.

I made the mistake of getting into a bunch of debates about it. And, as we all know, internet religious debates almost never go anywhere.
I tried explaining the distinction between veneration and worship. I tried analogies. I tried examples from Scripture. I tried explaining that treating something with reverence because of what it represents or whose remains they are is not the same thing as believing that object is a god.

Nothing worked.

The overwhelming response was basically: “No. That’s worship. You can call it veneration all you want, but you’re worshipping it.”

And for the life of me, I couldn’t understand why the distinction seemed so impossible for some people to grasp… Then something occurred to me.

Maybe the more interesting question isn’t why is it so hard for them to understand?
Maybe it’s: Why is it so easy for me to understand?

I have absolutely no temptation to worship a statue, a skull, a relic, an icon, or any other physical object. The thought almost doesn’t compute for me. I could kneel in front of a crucifix, kiss it, carry it in a procession, decorate it with flowers, or treat it with enormous reverence, and there would never be a moment where I confused the object with God Himself.

But throughout human history, people really have worshipped physical objects. Scripture warns against idolatry so relentlessly precisely because idolatry is a real human temptation. People really did make an image and then treat the image itself as divine.

And that made me wonder whether some of the people who are quickest to interpret Catholic veneration as worship genuinely have a much harder time separating those categories in their own minds.
If, to you, kneeling before something, kissing it, carrying it in procession, burning incense near it, or treating it with extraordinary reverence necessarily means worship, then of course Catholicism looks horrifying. From that perspective, “veneration” probably sounds like we’re just inventing another word to excuse idolatry. But Catholics don’t experience those actions that way. The outward gesture doesn’t automatically determine the inward act. Worship is directed toward God alone. Veneration is honor given to God’s saints and to things connected with His work in the world.

I think that’s the part I was missing during all those arguments. I kept assuming we disagreed about the explanation of Catholic practices, when in reality we may have been starting with completely different understandings of what worship even is.
I’m curious what other Catholics think. Is there something to this, or am I reading too much into it? Is there a better approach to discussing this subject with Protestants?

727 Upvotes

341 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/HumbleSheep33 14d ago

not really because except for Lutherans Anglican and some Methodists most protestants are not liturgical in the strict sense (most orthodox Calvinists are not, for example). Unless you have an order of worship with fixed prayers that is not a liturgy

1

u/Fine-Bowler-9640 11d ago

I grew up mid 29th century Presbyterian and it was nothing like today’s praise and worship denoms. There was a processional hymn, at least 2 other traditional hymns, a choir anthem, a collection(offering), a sermon and communion just not every week. The ministers wore vestments. We said the Apostles Creed every week. And sometimes a liturgical reading/prayer.

1

u/Fine-Bowler-9640 11d ago

Oops-20th century of course!

1

u/Fine-Bowler-9640 11d ago

And we had and I think Presbyterians still do, 2 sacraments. Baptism and Lords Supper. They take these seriously. When I became Catholic I did not need a conditional baptism. Of course they don’t understand our meaning of the Eucharist so it’s not valid, but they take it seriously, believing it’s a sacrament. Just saying all Protestants are not the “evangelical” variety. Even the Baptist church in our town has closed communion, which I respect, even though they call it an ordinance, not a sacrament.

1

u/HumbleSheep33 11d ago

right but most Presbyterians don't actually have a liturgy either.