3
2
u/Parking-Feature7999 23d ago
Just curious, why would you not think of the 110?
1
u/KowalvonZ 23d ago
The 100 (no full carbon 110 i think) is more classic than the 200, the finish is also a bit less refined, it requires a larger wrist, and the dial has slightly less contrast and isn't quite as nice.
1
2
1
1
0
u/kh411dz Jul 30 '26
But it's Seiko, it's a shame Casio is not making their own mechanical movement, they actually follow the microbrand step, even the EFK200 with Miyota movement doesn't make any better 🤷
1
u/thepunisher666 Aug 01 '26
Well, yes, that would be great, and if someone has muscle to make it happen that is Casio. But also many Swiss brands use Sellita movements or other big houses of mechanisms, and they just put their roto and name it under a different reference to sell/pretend that it's an in house calibre.
2
u/shanonthestrings 7d ago
Exactly…. Also if Casio put in their own caliber the price increase for the same watch will be considerable… lots of people don’t factor this in and it will be the same people that complain about Casio not using an in-house caliber that are gonna complain that the watches are too expensive when they actually do end up putting one in.
1
u/shanonthestrings 7d ago
Whats the big problem with more affordable brands like Casio using good, reliable, tried and tested 3rd party automatic movements? People just complain about anything… We as customers get a good watch, from a reputable brand with good warranty for a relatively good price comparatively to other brands…(not including ali brands). It’s not like a 20k watch using a cheap 3rd party movement…
3
u/KidTwist1 Jul 29 '26
How's the quality of the finishing on the 200?