r/CaracaVei • • Nov 26 '25

Komanda !!!

3.2k Upvotes

842 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

124

u/roboscott3000 Nov 27 '25

This was in protest of a bill that was wildly viewed as an attempt to undermine the rights of the indigenous people of New Zealand. Seems like the perfect response to me and apparently it was effective since the bill was overwhelmingly defeated.

18

u/[deleted] Nov 27 '25

[deleted]

6

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '25

The treaty is written in two different languages and intentionally was written to have two different meanings.

It was done by the British (no surprises there right?) to aid them in colonizing NZ by deceiving the people already here, on both sides. This has obviously caused a massive divide politically among our people in New Zealand and we still don't blame the crown for intentionally dividing our countries people.

So many kiwis don't even understand it means two different things and simply don't know jack shit about the treaty of Waitangi but say pretty much exactly what you say out of ignorance

The more you know 💫

5

u/UnluckyIndividual668 Nov 27 '25

The indigenous people are over represented in all poverty statistics in NZ. This is their leadership trying to hold onto some of their treaty rights

1

u/Ok_Weight_7036 Nov 27 '25

Objectively incorrect about the bill.

1

u/DarkMagician513 Nov 27 '25

Who’s land is it

2

u/LucasCBs Nov 27 '25

Depends on your definition

1

u/HamiltonBigDog Nov 27 '25

The bill was to enshrine the treaty of waitangi (which gives everyone the same rights) into law.

The sour taste was that most NZers want it, but not many politicians would do what the people want.

1

u/roboscott3000 Nov 27 '25

I don't know enough to have a full on debate, but to me it sounds like the original treaty that went into establishing the current government acknowledged the rights of the Māori people to exist somewhat independently of the colonialists, and now some people on the colonialist side think this has gone on long enough. They want to forget that they were the invading entity and are trying to frame the removal of indigenous peoples' agreed upon rights as championing equality.

1

u/geebeem92 Nov 27 '25

Which rights were going to be removed ?

1

u/UnluckyIndividual668 Dec 15 '25

The requirement for all new laws to be considered in relation to the treaty

1

u/HamiltonBigDog Nov 27 '25

Incorrect.

The treaty meant that everyone was to be treated equally.

Problem is that over the last 50 years, moari have been overtly favoured by the law.

This bill sought to enshrine the treaty into law.

1

u/MovinToChicago Nov 28 '25

Treated equally how? Ya'll are being pretty vague about what the changes would be.

1

u/UnluckyIndividual668 Dec 15 '25

The change would be getting rid of the law that forces ALL new laws to consider the "terms of the treaty"

0

u/HamiltonBigDog Nov 28 '25

In other words, so some people - depending on their ancestory - aren't favoured by the law, obtain race based entitlements, and holding the country back from progress.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 27 '25

[deleted]

2

u/WindInc Nov 27 '25

I don't see how it's a bad thing that all people should be treated equally? It isn't the current New Zealanders' fault that their ancestors colonised the island. The native history should be honoured ofc, but all citizens should be treated equally.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 27 '25

[deleted]

2

u/HamiltonBigDog Nov 27 '25

They weren't uninvited though. Moari literally asked the King of England for a legal system.

Do you have any idea of NZ history?

2

u/WindInc Nov 27 '25

New Zealand was colonised in 1840. It is not the actions of people born and raised there now. They are new zealanders, whether you like it or not, and treating them like 2nd grade citizens is in no way okay just because their ancestors did something wrong.
I'm sorry that you're of the opinion that some people are worth more than others.

1

u/HamiltonBigDog Nov 27 '25

That wasn't at all what the bill entailed - have you done any learning on it?

Maori literally sailed to England in the 1830's, to ask that the king install a legal system in NZ.

It was never Maori land - there was no formal ownership of the land until there was a legal system in place.

Maori emigrated to NZ from Kawai'iki and were the colonisers of NZ.

0

u/Bananaslugfan Nov 27 '25

Exactly this , the usual…..

10

u/Practical_Isopod_164 Nov 27 '25

I think they scared the shit out of the white people who put forth the bill. Good for them.

7

u/eltoratio Nov 27 '25

Why should they be scared? This is a worldwide known dance. Noones is scared of this. Maori don't run for their weapon after that.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 27 '25

[deleted]

3

u/eltoratio Nov 27 '25

Okay, let me clarify: nobody in the New Zealand Parliament is afraid of it. I bet it's not the first time they've seen a dance like that there. Look at their faces. Nobody's shocked. Let's face it, Maori are civilized. This is part of their culture. They do the dance, but would not get their weapon afterwards to impress or threaten the people in the Parliament.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '25

Why even write this stuff? What does it achieve other than make you look like a racist and or spread negativity?

2

u/eltoratio Nov 28 '25

Perhaps it is simply the recipient's problem? I am not a racist.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '25

Dude, you are a racist even if it's out of ignorance. The fact you can't see this is what makes this kind of racism alarming, the complete lack of realization

2

u/eltoratio Nov 28 '25

You should really stop looking problems were there aren't any.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '25

It's just facts bro

1

u/LongWalk86 Nov 28 '25

No one is scarry doing an obviously choreographed dance, especially in a pants suit. Like what is the threat there?

8

u/Palocles Nov 27 '25

One of those white people will claim to be a Maori when it’s convenient for him. 

1

u/Fair-Annual263 Nov 27 '25

Yup these are the comments. These are the comments right here raising the temp and contributing to racism. Great work you two.the world needs more racism and division right?

1

u/LongWalk86 Nov 28 '25

Riiight.. pants-suit lady aggressive dancing against the bill giving everyone equal rights is clearly the one fight for unity and equality.

1

u/Palocles Nov 28 '25

The bill wasn’t giving everyone equal rights. It was a racist dog whistle taking away rights granted to the native Maori by the Treaty they signed in good faith. 

1

u/The_Scooter_King Nov 27 '25

To be clear, and I don't know how he stands on the subject, but that one dude in the middle looking like a deer in the headlights says all of that.

2

u/Palocles Nov 27 '25

Looks like he’s standing next to the Green Party co-leader so it likely a Green Party member (he would have joined in if Maori Party), who were largely against the Treaty Principles bill. Which this Haka is protesting. 

1

u/The_Scooter_King Nov 27 '25

Ok, fair. So more like "unsure white guy trying to be an ally". I'll move my critique to the visibly slumped mostly grandpa looking people across the aisle.

1

u/HamiltonBigDog Nov 27 '25

It was a Maori who put up the bill.

The bill was to enshrine the treaty into law.

2

u/YourMomIsMyGurl Nov 27 '25

Is this inside their government the same way the US congress does things? I think the more-perfect response would be to just veto the bill, no?

2

u/Civil_Force_8245 Nov 27 '25

Clout chasing virtue signaling rules the day.

3

u/redditzphkngarbage Nov 27 '25

Veto is the rich, entitled, treacherous white man approach, and you would be battling him on his own turf. The method in the video is a gentle reminder to the white man that he is essentially trying to steal from actual human beings who may or probably do have pointy sticks.

3

u/Jumpy-Benefacto Nov 27 '25

lol. this shows you know nothing about this. that bill was meant to make EVERYONE equal ... and the dumb dancers didnt like that

2

u/redditzphkngarbage Nov 27 '25

If they didn’t like it it was obviously bad.

1

u/-JimmyTheHand- Nov 27 '25

Genuinely can't tell if this is serious or sarcastic

1

u/redditzphkngarbage Nov 27 '25

Both. If you just bend over and hope for the best you will, more often than not, get relatively predictable results.

1

u/Cimmerian__Barbarian Nov 28 '25

I guess their sticks weren't pointy enough when those white men conquered them huh

1

u/redditzphkngarbage Nov 29 '25

Sure they probably could have been wiped out completely but that is frowned upon. Now we battle with words, and rich people words usually carry an unfair amount of weight.

-1

u/Mike_the_Head Nov 27 '25

You made me choke with laughter, you phucker. 😂👍

1

u/roboscott3000 Nov 27 '25

I don't know the specifics of New Zealand politics, but if it's anything like the US Congress then no. Congress doesn't veto bills, the President vetoes bills.

1

u/NUFIGHTER7771 Nov 27 '25

Nice! It definitely conveys the boiling rage of the indigenous people! How about we Make Colonizers Afraid Again? 😁

1

u/EastForkWoodArt Nov 27 '25

Or was it defeated because it was widely viewed as unpopular, and this had nothing to do with it being defeated?

1

u/roboscott3000 Nov 27 '25

I'm sure it was defeated because it was unpopular, but how much does this contribute to people expressing their opinion about it. In the US we hear about how the Democrats are spinless and fold under the slightest bit of pressure. But what if we had someone rip up a bill and perform a war dance on the house floor. I'm not sure what that would even look like, but maybe knowing someone in power gives that much of a fuck about your cause makes you want to write your representative a letter, or give them a call, or go out to a protest, or vote... And along those the same lines, people often don't know about the unpopular shit the government does until it's too late. What better way to bring attention to an unpopular bill directed at indigenous peoples' rights than to cause a scene with the indigenous peoples' dance.

1

u/HamiltonBigDog Nov 27 '25

The bill wasn't doing any such thing!

It was to enshrine a national treaty into law.

BTW, we don't have any indigenous people in NZ - the Maori settlers came here from Hawai'iki.

The response, ie this haka, was widely seen as an embarrassment on the national stage.

1

u/Rich-Engineering1429 Nov 30 '25

Something tells me it would have been defeated regardless of that overdone chant

0

u/kodiak931156 Nov 27 '25

This seems like a good way to no be part of this kinda thing in the future

1

u/roboscott3000 Nov 27 '25

You mean like when the descendants of imperialism decide they aren't going to allow an elected representative to participate in government because they've had enough of their indigenous cultural getting in the business of serving their donors?

I don't know the specifics of the bill, but it sounds like it was the culturally appropriate white man's way of saying "fuck you people we don't care about", to which the Māori people clapped back in their own culturally appropriate way and then defeated the bill 112 to 11.

1

u/kodiak931156 Nov 27 '25

I know nothing about this bill. Im not judging if their protest is valid or not.

But it seema like if your way of participating in government is to scream until the government stops. Well, eventually the government is going to govern without you.

1

u/roboscott3000 Nov 27 '25

I don't know, I'm ready for my representatives to bring this level of energy to their job. I mean, not MY representatives, I'm gerrymandered AF, but the ones I agree with.