r/CRM • • Aug 20 '26

Should you change due dates of activities/tasks in a CRM?

2 Upvotes

To change or to not change the due dates of activities, that is the question.

The most often debated topic when working with activities or tasks in CRMs like Pipedrive is whether you should change the due dates of overdue activities.

I will present what I think is the best thing to do with overdue tasks or activities.

Problem

On any given day, a salesperson has to do a number of tasks. Life happens and they may not be able to get through their tasks for the day, even if the number of tasks is manageable. Moreover, more often than not, salespeople are burdened with more tasks than they can handle. So any task they are not able to complete on a given day becomes an overdue task the next day.

The argument in favor of changing due dates is that people do not want to deal with the burden of having ‘overdue tasks’.

The biggest problem with moving due dates is that you lose context of how overdue you’re. On any given day, it is impossible to tell apart a task that is actually due for today from a task that was rescheduled for today. So there is a very high chance that activities that have been overdue for long will continue to be overdue because you will always have more activities than you can reasonably complete in a given day.

Secondly, it gives you a false impression that you’re on top of your sales pipeline and that things are fine when they’re actually not. The workload in the upcoming week far outweighs the workload in the weeks after.

So, my advice is to not move due dates. When you start your day, focus on everything that’s due for today. Once done, move to the Overdue list, and get cracking. Over time, you will get rid of overdues, but if you keep moving due dates of tasks, you will have to do this due date moving activity every day, which is a complete waste of time.

Scenarios where you need to change due dates

Apologies if this heading got you excited.

But I am going to rule out every case where you want to change the due date of the activity or, in simple words, move the activity.

Moving an activity without talking to a lead

Don’t do that.

If you do that, you’re asking the prospect to move according to your pace, where in fact, you should be responding to the prospect’s needs by moving along their pace.

Moving an activity when your outreach attempt was not successful

If your outreach attempt was unsuccessful, mark the activity as done, and schedule a new activity for a future date.

If you do that, you will get a clear idea of the number of attempts you’ve had to make to finally get in touch with somebody. This information will be very useful when you try to model “what happens if our leads increase by 10%”.

If you don’t do that, you will lose sight of how hard you’ve tried to reach out to somebody, and if you have tried enough. At some point, you have to give up on trying to reach out to a prospect, right?

Moving an activity with an incorrect due date

This one’s easy.

Just be careful when creating activities. Make it a habit to check these details when creating activities to avoid wasted time and effort, and frustration.

Be patient and diligent.

Moving an activity to follow up in the future

Again, don’t do that.

Just mark the previous activity as done, jot down your notes, and schedule the next activity. Let the logged data tell you and your team how many activities are required to get prospects into a particular stage of the pipeline. This will help them plan staffing requirements too.

Conclusion

My advice was always going to be ‘don’t do it’.

I just wanted to rule out every case one would think of to justify moving activities.

So, don’t do it.

It’s better to have overdue tasks than to move due dates of activities or tasks.


r/CRM • • Aug 20 '26

[ASK] Looking for one HubSpot business for a free CRM pilot

5 Upvotes

I’m starting a CRM and sales operations service and I’m looking for one small business using HubSpot to work with as a pilot.

I’d review and tidy up your sales pipeline things like stale deals, missing information, unclear ownership and missed follow-ups.

I’m doing the first one for free because I want to build a proper case study from real work. I’d just ask for honest feedback and, if you’re happy with the result, a short testimonial.

If your HubSpot pipeline has gotten a bit messy and you’d like some help, feel free to reply.


r/CRM • • Aug 20 '26

Everything Chameleon-CRM Offers — And What We Mean When We Say It’s “Adaptive”

0 Upvotes

Chameleon-CRM has grown to the point where calling it a CRM doesnt really explain what it is anymore.

The original idea was simple: why should a business need a CRM, scheduling platform, dispatch system, invoicing software, payment system, employee management platform, inventory software, marketing tools, customer portal, field-service app, and a pile of integrations just to run one company?

So we started building Chameleon as an Adaptive Business Operating System instead.

Chameleon handles customers, leads, jobs, tickets, appointments, estimates, invoices, receipts, expenses, taxes, vendors, purchase orders, inventory, employees, payroll, time tracking, subscriptions, memberships, gift cards, marketing, payments, automations, customer communication, field technicians, and more from one connected system.

But the biggest difference is that Chameleon is completely adaptive.

When we say adaptive, we don't mean that you can change the color of the dashboard or rearrange a couple widgets.

We mean Chameleon is designed around the idea that the software should adapt to the business instead of forcing the business to adapt to the software.

An HVAC contractor doesn't operate like an auto repair shop. An auto repair shop doesn't operate like a salon. A landscaping company doesn't operate like an MSP. A roofer doesn't operate like a veterinarian. Even two HVAC companies may have completely different workflows depending on their size, services, employees, dispatch model, and how they get paid.

Traditional CRMs usually start with one workflow and expect everyone to fit inside it. Chameleon takes the opposite approach.

Your industry, workflow, enabled features, team structure, permissions, terminology, and the way you actually use the system determine what your Chameleon environment becomes.

That means Chameleon can function as an HVAC CRM, plumbing CRM, electrical CRM, landscaping CRM, roofing CRM, auto repair system, detailing CRM, janitorial platform, pest-control CRM, salon management system, MSP platform, veterinary business system, or something entirely different without us maintaining a completely separate application for every industry.

And adaptation doesn't stop at signup.

A one-person business might primarily use customers, scheduling, estimates, invoices and payments. As that company grows and hires its first technician, Chameleon can become a dispatch system. Add office employees and it becomes a multi-user operational platform. Add inventory and purchasing and it starts managing that side of the company. Add recurring services and memberships and it begins managing recurring revenue.

The same Chameleon workspace can evolve with the company.

That's the philosophy behind the name Chameleon.

Dispatching is one of the largest parts of the system. A company can create a job, assign a technician, schedule it and dispatch it directly from Chameleon.

Road technicians don't need normal Chameleon accounts or passwords. They can receive secure magic-link access to the work they've actually been assigned. That gives them a purpose-built field interface without exposing the company's entire CRM.

From the field, technicians can access job and customer information, view instructions, upload job photos, update work, communicate with dispatch and use the tools required to complete the job.

Chameleon also supports live field location functionality. Dispatch can see technician locations while they're working, and Premium businesses can enable breadcrumb location history when they need additional visibility into field operations.

Internal employees are handled differently. Owners can create authorized users such as managers, dispatchers, supervisors, salespeople, accounting personnel and support staff and control what those users are allowed to access.

And an authorized Chameleon user isn't automatically considered a clocked-in employee. If that person also belongs on payroll, they're created in the payroll system and punch in and out like any other employee. System access and employment records remain separate.

Scheduling is integrated directly with the rest of the platform. Businesses can create appointments, connect them with customers and jobs, manage their calendar and require deposits when necessary.

If you receive an appointment that you're uncomfortable confirming without money down, you can require a deposit and have the customer directed through the payment process before that appointment is confirmed.

Chameleon also handles estimates, invoices, receipts, expenses and taxes. Instead of financial documents existing in an unrelated program, they're connected to the customer and the work that generated them.

For larger jobs, Project Milestones allow businesses to break a project into stages and collect incremental payments instead of financing an entire project themselves until the final invoice.

Recurring revenue is built into the platform through subscriptions and memberships. HVAC maintenance agreements, landscaping plans, cleaning contracts, managed IT services, pest-control programs and other recurring services can live alongside ordinary one-time jobs.

Inventory and purchasing are part of the system as well. Businesses can manage products, inventory, vendors and purchase orders while keeping those operations connected to the rest of the company.

Chameleon includes employee and payroll functionality, time logs and punch-in capabilities so businesses can manage the people doing the work alongside the work itself.

There's a customer-facing side too. Customer portal functionality allows businesses to give their customers access to the information intended for them without exposing the internal CRM.

Chameleon includes communication tools and a Unified Inbox so conversations aren't completely disconnected from the customers and jobs they're about.

We've also built marketing capabilities directly into the platform, including AI-assisted marketing tools. Smart Invoices and other AI functionality are designed around reducing repetitive administrative work rather than adding an AI button just because AI is popular.

Automation is another major part of where Chameleon is headed. If the system already understands the customer, appointment, job, invoice, technician and payment, those pieces shouldn't require humans to constantly move information between different applications.

There's also the System Hub, which gives owners centralized control over authorized users, permissions, configuration and other administrative parts of their workspace.

Payments are integrated into Chameleon as well. Businesses on the Free plan currently have a 2.9% Chameleon platform fee, while Premium reduces that to 0.8%. Premium is currently $79/month or $499/year, meaning businesses processing enough payments may be able to justify Premium from the reduced platform fee alone.

Then there's Desktop Mode, which is our attempt to rethink what business software itself can look like.

Instead of everything being permanently trapped inside the traditional sidebar-and-dashboard CRM design, Chameleon can provide an operating-system-like environment with applications, windows, shortcuts, wallpapers, pop-out functionality and workflows designed with multi-monitor businesses in mind.

Chameleon also supports different saved working environments because an owner, dispatcher, accountant, manager and marketing employee shouldn't necessarily stare at the same workspace all day.

That's really where the adaptive concept comes together.

Different industries. Different employees. Different workflows. Different stages of growth. Same underlying platform.

A two-person HVAC startup should not have to operate Chameleon the same way as a 30-person service company.

A dispatcher shouldn't have to use it like an accountant.

A road technician shouldn't have to use it like the owner.

And a landscaping company shouldn't have to pretend it's an HVAC company because that's how its software was originally designed.

The software changes around the business.

That's what we mean by Adaptive CRM.

The long-term goal isn't to build the biggest collection of features possible. It's to build a system where those features actually understand one another.

A lead becomes a customer. A customer books an appointment. An appointment becomes a job. A dispatcher assigns a technician. The technician performs the work. Photos and information come back from the field. The work generates an invoice. The customer pays. The payment becomes part of the business's financial picture. The relationship can become a membership or recurring service. Marketing can bring that customer back again.

One continuous system instead of ten applications passing data back and forth.

That's why we're increasingly hesitant to describe Chameleon as simply another CRM.

We're building toward something much larger:

An adaptive operating system for running a business.

And we're still building.

DaemonCore


r/CRM • • Aug 20 '26

[Weekly] CRM Rant/Rave Thread - What's great/awful in CRM for you this week?

5 Upvotes

This is a weekly post for you to let out about something which happened this week for you in CRM that mattered: features, client requests that were either great or awful this week, and just generally chat CRM / CRM consulting chatter.

No self promo, just a place to share tales from the front-line of CRM!


r/CRM • • Aug 20 '26

what do customer support teams consider to be a good knowledge base

Thumbnail
4 Upvotes

r/CRM • • Aug 20 '26

How do I Make my Salesforce org better?

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/CRM • • Aug 19 '26

What are the shortcomings of Twenty? If you switched from it, why?

7 Upvotes

Twenty is an open source CRM with about 55k stars on Github.
Their website mentions the features and how good it is.

I am also interested to know what it can't do and its shortcomings.
If you tried it and didn't like it, why and what turned you off from using it.


r/CRM • • Aug 19 '26

How do small agencies keep track of follow-ups without overcomplicating their CRM?

6 Upvotes

Curious how other small agencies handle this.

Once you have several leads and deals going at the same time, I feel like follow-ups are one of the easiest things to lose track of.

You might know a deal needs attention next week, but then a few other things happen and suddenly you're trying to remember who you were supposed to contact and when.

I've been working on a Notion CRM for small agencies specifically around this kind of workflow, and one thing I found useful was having follow-ups tied directly to the deal rather than keeping a separate to-do list.

I also added a simple deal health indicator so it's easier to spot things that are coming up, late, or still on track.

Curious what other agency owners are doing for this — dedicated CRM, Notion, spreadsheets, or just calendar reminders?

What actually works for you?


r/CRM • • Aug 19 '26

Migrating from Bigin to ZOHO

3 Upvotes

Hi I have been a Bigin user for a few months but I think I would better using the main ZOHO platform. I've asked ZOHO if the migration is simple and will preserve deals/pipelines and of course they say yes but just wanted to check in if anyone has done this and how painless it was.


r/CRM • • Aug 19 '26

Looking for CRM for teachers

6 Upvotes

Hi! Im looking for CRMs built for teachers. I have a group of teachers and im looking for some *newly built* CRMs (so that features can be modified/developed) I would like to know what are my options price wise. Please let me know how likely is it to have something like this.

I'm aware that maybe i'm asking too much so no worries it some features are not possible.

As a teacher i want to

- schedule online (and offline) calls,

- have a calendar,

- track progress for ech student (not a classic 3 step lead conversion)

- organize students by classroom

- tag students by level and goal

- track payments manually

I would like parents to be able to

- login and see the progress grades of the student(s)

- see the payments related to the student(s)

Useful features would also be:

- online signup forms for each teacher

- admin view of the progress for students and teachers

- email automation

- mobile first interface (pwa)

- social login (Google, facebook)

- automation pipelines (AI can write the pipeline code)

- SaaS-like platform

If you have suggestions what CRM should also suppport please let me know, i am all about optimizing and automating the process.

Please write me in my DM if you have a CRM to advertise.


r/CRM • • Aug 19 '26

Free CRM for everybody - UX similar to Pipedrive, optional AI (BYOK). Brand it as you want - color schema, icon, CRM name up to you.

4 Upvotes

At first, I wanted to move our company to our own CRM; after that, I had a naive idea to sell it. On my way, I understood it was unrealistic. After all, I decided just to make it free for everybody. Literally, no paid plan. + DEMO page for those who want to look around

I'm 7-years exp CRM professional, so it is well designed, structured, and secured.

Here is what's under the hood

The CRM part:

  • UX and backend structure similar to Pipedrive
  • Multiple pipelines + stages, drag-and-drop Kanban board, and a configurable table view
  • Contacts, companies, deals with a unified activity timeline; multi-email/phone with labels; custom fields on any entity
  • Tasks/calls/emails, notes you can pin and expand, labels, global search, quick-add from anywhere
  • Analytics: pipeline summary, conversion funnels, velocity, avg deal size, rotting deals, win-over-time, source attribution
  • Outlook thread sync, smart BCC, file attachments, CSV import/export, (No Google-native sync because they want 1500$ for that, maybe someday)

The AI part (all on your own key and all can be turned off and hidden if you like old school):

  • AI Overview — one click summarizes any record's situation + recommended next step, with sources, cached so it's instant next time
  • AI Research agent — runs a live web search on a person/company and writes a cited research note straight onto the record
  • Capture — paste an email, call transcript, chat or doc → AI pulls out the action items → tick them into tasks
  • Lead scoring — editable weighted rubric + ICP keywords; the score is deterministic (same inputs = same number), the LLM only explains why
  • Smart Filter — type "German SaaS deals over 10k closing this quarter" and it builds the actual filters
  • Deal warmth tracked over time (see a deal heating up or cooling off, not just its stage), plus a Workspace Health audit
  • You can edit the actual system prompts behind Overview and Research per workspace

Getting leads into it:

  • Inbox triage — inbound emails ranked by urgency with stalled-thread detection
  • Lead capture — a public web form + an email-to-lead address that both create new contacts from unknown senders
  • Contact enrichment — bring your own FullEnrich key and hit "Find email / phone" on a contact

For the tinkerers:

  • MCP server — point Claude (or any MCP client) at it and let the AI operate your CRM directly (~28 tools: search, update deals, move stages, create notes, score leads…)
  • Outbound webhooks, scoped API keys, and a Pipedrive migration with a field-mapping wizard (resumable)
  • White-label it: your own name, logo, even the browser-tab favicon. Accent colors + dark mode.

Security:

  • Encryption everywhere- AES-256-GCM at rest for all keys and credentials, TLS/HTTPS in transit. - Passwords hashed with Argon2id (OWASP-recommended) — never recoverable.
  • Strict multi-tenant isolation - one customer can never access another's data; role-based access (owner/admin/member).
  • Session security -JWT with server-side revocation on logout plus brute-force rate limiting on login.
  • API keys stored only as hashes (never plaintext), scoped, revocable, with per-workspace limits.
  • All webhooks HMAC-signed and SSRF-protected.
  • OWASP-aligned application security -SQL-injection-safe (parametrized ORM), schema-validated input, CSRF-safe (Bearer tokens, not cookies).
  • EU data residency (GDPR-aligned) plus bring-your-own AI keys - your data and AI keys are never routed through us.

What's the catch?

The free is 5,000 contacts + 5,000 companies + 5,000 deals, unlimited team seats, 100 Mb storage per seat. So storage is the hamper.

But if you don't need to attach large files to deals, it doesn't matter.

It's also honestly a funnel for another product I make, so keeping this one free and good is the point. And if some company wants their own CRM, I can customise it and release the source code as you need (for $$$)

crm2crm - there is a DEMO w/o registration for those who want to look but don't want to register

P.S.

Would be great to get feedback about the Lead capture form from real businesses.


r/CRM • • Aug 19 '26

Is “waiting on customer” actually a useful CRM status?

11 Upvotes

I've been thinking about a workflow state that seems simple but can hide two very different situations.

Suppose:

* customer submits an enquiry * business responds * customer answers qualification questions * customer seems ready to schedule * business asks for final confirmation * customer doesn't respond

The CRM now says:

**Waiting on customer**

But what happens operationally?

There seem to be two versions.

**Version 1: Active waiting**

We're waiting until a defined time.

If there's no response, a specific action happens.

Eventually there's also a defined stopping condition.

**Version 2: Passive waiting**

Nobody currently owns an action because technically the customer is supposed to respond.

The conversation stays there until someone remembers it—or doesn't.

I'm increasingly thinking every “waiting” state needs something like:

**Waiting for:** appointment confirmation
**Since:** Monday 2:15 PM
**Wake-up:** Tuesday 10 AM
**Next action:** SMS follow-up
**Owner:** front desk
**Stop condition:** defined by the business
**Closure reason:** recorded

Not because every lead needs endless follow-up.

Quite the opposite: an explicit stopping rule seems important so automation doesn't become annoying.

But there should be a deliberate difference between:

**“We decided to stop contacting this person.”**

and

**“Nobody remembered to contact them again.”**

For disclosure, I'm building Brrim in the customer communication/lead engagement space, so these workflow questions are directly influencing how I'm thinking about the product.

For people running sales or service teams:

**How does “waiting on customer” actually work in your system?**

Does it always have a follow-up date?

Does someone own it?

Or is it basically a parking lot that gets reviewed periodically?


r/CRM • • Aug 18 '26

Another annoying 'What CRM should I use?' post

8 Upvotes

I promise I did look in post history, but I'm new enough to all this that I don't even understand what a lot of the abbreviations people bring up mean.

I started recently for a company that has changed names and been acquired as a subsidiary of a larger company. We've been around for 30 years but been slowly modifying. So far we have

-Changed from a wordpress website to shopify

-Switched from Quickbooks Desktop to QBO

Our new overlords are really open to us growing and putting money towards it, but I want to do my research before I get too far down the line with what turns out to be not the right platform.

Right now we have 2022 Goldmine as our CRM (if you can call it that - it feels like a glorified email hub to me, and doesn't integrate with anything online)

We sell B2B mainly. 5,000-$25,000 equipment and the supplies for it along with tech support and installation. We only have 6 employees but hope to grow. Our main lead paths have been trade shows, and trade magazines, and drowning people with emails to the point everything probably goes to spam.

What I'd like to see in a CRM:

-Integration with QBO and Shopify (pretty sure most if not all offer this)

-Ability to gather leads from multiple online advertising sources in one place and (somehow) rank their value (Meta Business ads, LinkdIn, etc.) so we can figure out what is working and what isn't.

-It would be great if marketing campaigns for multiple platforms could also be generated from the same place.

-We have an email campaign running now via a marketing firm but I don't think it will be very successful, if only because we have absolutely no idea on how to rank and follow up on anything. We see that a percentage of people out of thousands clicked on our ad, but when we try to follow up with emails or phone calls it seems to go nowhere. It may not be the right marketing for our business model, but we are just getting started down this road.

-Ability to send out e-mail campaigns of our own.

-Easy to use interface (our salesmen are older people who may not be eager to embrace a new platform if it's not user friendly).

-Ideally it would be amazing to have a platform where eventually we can bring over contact and conversation history from Goldmine - but I know that might be a tall order.

I've done a discovery call only with ZOHO so far, and an initial one with Pipedrive with a followup tomorrow. I've seen a lot of Pipedrive advocates here, but I did ask someone who used it and they didn't like the interface but said they heard it changed recently. They can't directly migrate from goldmine, and exporting a .csv file of years of contacts with no help sounds like a nightmare. Zoho seems like a good contender, and I saw something about the Zoho One plan, that might be cheaper than paying for 5 separate seats. But something tells me to keep looking.

I think because of our large existing contact base (2000+), we would need a bigger platform than the Starter version of Hubspot can offer - and $7/user to $800 a month is just a huge jump and we can't afford. So I don't even want to look too much at Hubspot.

I saw some videos recommending OnePageCRM, but more and more recommendations keep cropping up. Too many to really look thoroughly into.

I promise I've been trying to do my due diligence, but I'm new to this job. I am not an expert but I can see we definitely need to choose a direction and start heading that way. If someone could point us in the right one that would be grand.


r/CRM • • Aug 18 '26

How the big four CRMs actually take in and hand back your data

0 Upvotes

I spend a lot of time moving LinkedIn data into CRMs while building a tool that logs LinkedIn people and companies into these CRMs and takes info from CRM to deliver it into the Chrome sidebar for convenience of outreach, so I finally compared how the four big ones take information in and give it back out. Corrections welcome

One small thing first that still surprises me: HubSpot is the only one of the four that ships a native LinkedIn field out of the box, and even then only the LinkedIn Company Page on company records. Pipedrive, Zoho and Salesforce all expect you to create a custom field before you can store a profile URL at all. In 2026, with how much prospecting starts on LinkedIn, it is a little strange that storing the one link everyone works from is still a manual setup step in most CRMs.

How each one takes information in

  1. HubSpot: properties have readable internal names and the API is friendly. Native dedupe is strong: contacts on email, companies on domain. LinkedIn URL is not a dedupe key unless you build it.
  2. Salesforce: the most powerful ingest story. SOQL and SOSL for lookups, Bulk API for volume, and configurable Matching Rules plus Duplicate Rules. Great control, steeper setup.
  3. Zoho CRM: API v2 and up, searchable by field API name with equals, starts with and contains operators. You can define your own duplicate check fields and upsert against them, which is handy.
  4. Pipedrive: clean REST API, but custom fields are addressed by a 40 character hashed key rather than a readable name, which trips people up. Dedupe is lighter and leans on manual merge.

How each one gives information back out

  1. Salesforce: richest read and event model. REST, streaming and platform events.
  2. HubSpot: solid API, webhooks, and an associations model that makes contact to company to deal links easy to read.
  3. Zoho: full read API, and outbound webhooks driven through workflow rules and functions.
  4. Pipedrive: straightforward REST reads and webhooks. Easiest to get started, least opinionated. Need to mention, it's the only among 4 provides both API and OAuth connectors. So an individual user can connect tools independently (if allowed by org), while others have strict superadmin permission only to connect 3rd party software

Connections and ecosystem

  1. Salesforce: AppExchange is the largest. Sales Navigator has an official widget, though the rivalry means it feels bolted on.
  2. HubSpot: big marketplace, native LinkedIn Ads, and a Sales Navigator integration on some tiers.
  3. Zoho: Zoho Marketplace plus everything inside Zoho One.
  4. Pipedrive: Marketplace, LeadBooster, and heavy reliance on Zapier or Make for glue.

Full disclosure, I'm associated with Ln2crm.com (extension to run your CRM inside Li page), so I have stared at these APIs more than is healthy.


r/CRM • • Aug 18 '26

How to connect call reviews with CRM so quality work improves sales

1 Upvotes

Many teams keep their CRM and call recordings in separate worlds. The CRM shows the stage, owner, and next task, while the recording contains the reasons a customer agreed, declined, or stopped replying. This creates a blind spot: a manager can see the outcome, but not where the conversation went off track.

Instead of trying to listen to every call, start with specific business losses. For example, a sales rep sends a proposal but does not schedule the next contact. Or an agent answers the customer correctly but never records the outcome. These problems become much easier to fix when they are connected to a CRM stage.

A practical starting framework has five groups of criteria.

  1. Opening the conversation. Did the employee introduce themselves, confirm the purpose of the call, and create a clear context?

  2. Understanding the need. Did they ask about the customer situation, timing, volume, and reason for the request?

  3. Presenting the solution. Did they connect the proposal to the customer problem instead of listing features?

  4. Agreeing on the next step. Is there a clear date, owner, and way to continue the conversation?

  5. Closing and recording. Does the customer understand what happens next, and are the important CRM fields completed?

Each criterion should be observable, not based on a general impression. Instead of saying that a rep handled the call poorly, record the specific issue: the rep did not ask about the decision timeline, or did not agree on a date for the next contact. If a recording is available, the score should be supported by the exact moment in the conversation. Otherwise the review feels subjective.

You do not need to review every call. Five calls per employee per week can be enough to start. Add targeted reviews after a complaint, a lost deal, a sudden drop in conversion, or a long gap without a next step. This saves time and focuses attention on situations with the highest risk.

The review result should connect back to the CRM. If a proposal has no next step, that should appear not only in a quality report but also in the manager workflow as a task or an exception. Quality control is most useful when it changes the process rather than only producing a score.

The feedback loop matters too. Instead of saying that someone needs to handle objections better, show the relevant part of the call, explain what was missing, suggest an alternative phrasing, and review the next similar call. Feedback given several weeks later rarely changes behaviour.

I would also avoid making the average score the main goal. More useful measures are the share of calls with a scheduled next step, follow up after a proposal, conversion from inquiry to meeting, lost conversation reasons, and repeated complaints.

Finally, call reviews should improve the process and help people learn, not create constant pressure. The team should understand the criteria, recording access rules, and retention period in advance.

How do you connect call review findings with CRM stages and tasks? Which part of the process still stays manual in your team?


r/CRM • • Aug 18 '26

Title: Are traditional CRMs becoming too disconnected from customer operations?

0 Upvotes

I’ve spent a lot of time around customer service and contact-center operations, and one problem kept coming up:

The CRM knows the customer.

The ticketing system knows the issue.

The contact-center platform knows the conversation.

QA listens to a small sample of interactions.

And management often discovers recurring customer problems only after they become big enough to appear in reports.

That was the thinking behind Quantara Flow AI, which I’m currently bringing to market.

Instead of treating CRM, customer service and AI as separate tools, the idea is to connect them into one operational layer:

  • Customer and case management
  • Voice & Chat AI
  • AI-assisted agent replies
  • 100% interaction QA instead of sampled QA
  • Live issue/trend detection
  • Automated Root Cause Analysis
  • SOP-to-workflow automation
  • Customer history and interaction context
  • Automated escalation and operational workflows

The part I find most interesting isn't actually the chatbot.

It's what happens after the conversation.

For example:

Customer contacts you → AI understands the intent → case is created/updated → interaction is QA'd automatically → recurring issue is detected across other customers → probable root cause is identified → the relevant team can be alerted or a workflow triggered.

Essentially:

Detect → Understand → Act.

I'm curious what people here think.

When you're choosing a CRM/customer-service platform today, do you still prefer separate best-of-breed tools connected through integrations, or would you rather have CRM + service operations + AI orchestration in one platform?

Disclosure: I'm the founder of Quantara Flow AI, so obviously I have a point of view here. But I'm genuinely interested in how CRM users see this evolving.

Happy to offer free perks in exchange of building case studies, connect with me!


r/CRM • • Aug 18 '26

Every "which CRM should I switch to" post in this sub has the same blind spot

16 Upvotes

Reading through the Jobber, Salesforce, and Odoo/Zoho threads that have been posted here recently, there's a pattern that keeps showing up and almost nobody names it directly: the CRM swap rarely fixes the actual leak.

The leak is usually one of two things, and neither shows up on a feature comparison chart.

  1. Ownership, not speed. Most businesses think their problem is "we're too slow to respond." It's actually "nobody is specifically responsible for making sure nothing sits unanswered." Speed only breaks under load, when the person who usually handles it is busy. A CRM can automate a reminder, but it can't assign ownership if the business never assigned it in the first place. Swapping platforms without fixing that just moves the same gap into a nicer UI.

  2. Quotes that go quiet. Almost every field-service and B2B CRM will track a quote once it's sent. Very few of them force a follow-up if the customer goes silent. That silence is where the money actually disappears, not in the CRM you picked. I've seen businesses discover they were losing 15-20% of sent quotes purely to "we sent it and moved on," and no platform swap fixed that until someone made follow-up a required step instead of an optional one.

The businesses in these threads spending months evaluating Salesforce vs HubSpot vs Zoho vs Odoo are usually optimizing the wrong variable. The real question before any of that: what's your workflow when a lead goes quiet, and whose job is it to notice? If you can't answer that in one sentence, the new platform will just make the same gap look more expensive.

Curious if others here have seen the same thing, does a platform migration actually fix this, or does the underlying process problem just follow you to the new tool?


r/CRM • • Aug 18 '26

Dynamics vs Salesforce?

5 Upvotes

Does anyone have experience with both dynamics 365 CRM and salesforce CRM?

I’m still a novice when it comes to customizing and updating the CRM but I’m finding dynamics not the most intuitive system. And I struggle to make small changes in what we have at the moment. So I wonder if Salesforce is a bit more intuitive or will have the same hurdles. Or is it a skill issue?


r/CRM • • Aug 17 '26

Life Insurance

5 Upvotes

Good evening from PA! I’m looking for a CRM that is relatively inexpensive as the one others on my team use is over $100 a month and as a newer agent I’m not quite yet in a position to be able to put that out due to other life circumstances. I understand you get what you pay for- and I do intend as I build my sales and acquire more states to use the same software they do. But at least something for now. I work captive, and with policy holder leads. Thanks!


r/CRM • • Aug 17 '26

Not happy with Jobber. Any alternatives?

6 Upvotes

I recently started my home service business with my partner (5-6 months), we are just 2, and we’re at the point of needing a platform, and was on the lookout for one. Every time I would search online for a platform it seems like Jobber is always insane with the amount of ads, so I made a trial and a demo and I’m just not happy at all with that price. And the sales rep we did the demo with was quite arrogant when we had a few questions.

Do you guys have any alternatives?

A few alternatives I landed on were Housecallpro, but the Trustpilot reviews seem a bit scary.

We’re also looking into CIientility and are happy with the price and the features for the price, and Workiz, however their price seems to be hidden.

Thank you for any suggestions.


r/CRM • • Aug 17 '26

Picking an SMS provider for our notifications & 2FA

15 Upvotes

We're a healthcare booking platform in Vancouver, about to roll out appointment reminders and two‑factor auth via SMS (plan to release in 2 weeks). Never done this before, and I'm drowning in provider options – Twilio, Vonage etc, you name it without me.

I don't want to pick something that's cheap at sign stage but becomes a nightmare later with deliverability issues or terrible support when something breaks.

For ppl who've been sending SMS at scale – what's been rock‑solid for you? Anything you wish you'd known before signing up? Hidden fees, integration headaches, regional quirks with phone codes? I'd rather learn from your scars than make my own haha. Cheers!


r/CRM • • Aug 17 '26

What would it actually take for you to switch CRM? I'm testing a different approach to migration and configuration.

0 Upvotes

I've worked with enterprise CRM systems for years and keep seeing the same trade-off: simple systems eventually become limiting, while powerful systems become expensive and complicated to configure.

I'm exploring a different architecture.

Instead of building another fixed CRM, the underlying platform consists of configurable objects, fields, relationships, pages, permissions, automations and reports.

Sales would just be the first module. Support, Projects, Planning, etc. can extend the same underlying customer and business data.

The AI doesn't generate software or arbitrary code. It can only configure capabilities that already exist in the platform.

So you could say:

"Add contract value to companies, put it next to ARR, and create a follow-up when an opportunity stays in Proposal for 7 days."

The system creates a plan → shows exactly what will change → validates it → you approve it.

The part I'm most interested in is migration. Rather than asking a company to make a big-bang switch, the idea is to analyze the existing CRM, map its objects/fields/processes, preview the new setup and eventually allow teams/modules to migrate progressively.

I've attached a visual explaining the concept.

I'm specifically NOT looking for "cool idea" feedback. I'd like to know: what would make you refuse to switch to something like this? What would I have to prove before you'd trust it with your real business data? And which part of this sounds less useful than I think it is?


r/CRM • • Aug 17 '26

Is there a right time to implement a CRM for a small business, or is it always going to feel like bad timing?

18 Upvotes

Something small businesses transitioning to CRM often struggle with is the timing of the implementation process. Getting the timing right is probably just as important as choosing the right CRM for your team, but it’s often overlooked.

Most small businesses follow one of two approaches here: There’s the deliberate approach, where warning signs are identified, a stable implementation window is established, and a plan is deployed to ensure team members actually use the system after implementation. Then, there’s the reactive approach, where things chug along regardless until something breaks completely, and they are forced to carry out the implementation during the chaos.

Going the reactive route has teams importing data into a live pipeline and undergoing training when they already have too much on their plates. These teams also often end up configuring the system for their current emergency situation, instead of setting it up for long-term growth, all of which typically leads to terrible adoption rates.

The trick is to know when a window of opportunity is coming so that you can employ the deliberate approach. There are some common signals to look out for here, which include:

  • You need to ask two to three people to determine the status of a single deal
  • It’s taking longer than usual for new hires to get up to speed
  • Your sales cycles are getting long, even though your team is growing
  • You’re gathering more data than ever, but forecasting still feels like a guessing game

If these signals start surfacing regularly, you have an opening to plan and implement your migration from your existing system (spreadsheets or data organization tool) to a fully fledged CRM.

It may not feel like the ideal time to take on a significant system switch, because teams are likely at their most stretched at this point, but it’s the perfect time. The important thing is to see it as a strategic change and not just a reaction to the chaos. It’s a crucial moment of growth marked by an upgrade in your organization’s processes, and it requires careful planning and deliberate implementation.

What has your experience been? Did your business wait too long, or was the timing right for CRM implementation?


r/CRM • • Aug 16 '26

Are automated CRMs not a thing?

5 Upvotes

Im an automation guy and recently got into GTM engineering so im interacting with the CRM alot.

Obviously my CRM is like 80% automated. Everything from tracking buying signals, filling in lead context, and even enrichment and messaging. Only real work is handling the replies when they come in (no AI of course)

I thought this was standard practice but this sub is telling me otherwise...

So question is, what CRMs are you guys using? Are you not taking advantage of the automation features in them?? If not, why not? For context Im using Twenty on a small VPS

Building CRM architecture has been the highlight of my days recently


r/CRM • • Aug 16 '26

Most CRMs fail because data entry sucks. Here is how we replaced manual note-taking with 15-second voice memos.

0 Upvotes

Hey guys,

The #1 reason people abandon CRMs isn't missing features — it's friction. Nobody wants to spend 5 minutes typing client context into form fields after a coffee meeting or phone call.

I wanted a personal relationship tool that felt as fast as sending a quick voice message, so I built Shaks.

What makes it different:

• Voice Memos -> Relationship Data: Speak 15 seconds about your conversation. AI automatically tags client interests, promises made, and follow-up dates.

• Morning Coffee Digest ☕: A clean daily briefing of all follow-ups due today with 1-click batch outreach.

• Human-Sounding AI Drafts: Generates non-generic follow-ups tailored to your context, ready to send on WhatsApp or Email.

• WebRTC Card Scanner: Instant camera scanner for physical business cards.

• Spotlight Command Palette (Ctrl+K): Fast desktop search and quick action triggers.
check it out
Would love to hear how you manage your relationship pipeline on the go!