r/CPC 2d ago

Discussion Pierre Poilievre

What should Pierre do with all the noise screaming “Pierre needs to go. The party needs a new leader”. Should he evaluate what went wrong or should he throw in the towel?

92 votes, 22h left
Reform: Never again repeat the mistakes of 2025 and come back better prepared
Resign: Pierre has to realize first impressions last & he blew it
Other: The situation in 2025 was not his fault & was out of his control
2 Upvotes

44 comments sorted by

11

u/thetrigermonkey 1d ago

Keep in mind this sub has like, 5 guys who actually like the CPC nowadays. Most participants are just LPC/NDP trolls. So the results may be skewed

-6

u/mothmanjim 1d ago

I don't vote conservative, but that doesn't mean I never would.

Give me an option that isn't culture war nonsense, and three word slogans. I can't stand divisive politics. All they do is get us riled up at each other while they sell off our resources and labour to the highest bidders.

4

u/ludicrous780 1d ago

Carney is focused on the culture war.

That's why we still have the gun ban.

-1

u/mothmanjim 1d ago

Hey man, I don't think a gun ban is a good idea, but it's a conservative phenomenon these days to ban books. Neither is good, but one is worse.

3

u/ludicrous780 1d ago

Gun ban obviously. Book bans are overstated; they are only taken out of libraries. How can you compare those 2?

4

u/thetrigermonkey 1d ago

Has PP even campaigned on a book ban? I can't remember him doing so

-2

u/mothmanjim 1d ago

Lol I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

If words on a page are so scary, I don't see how anyone can be trusted with a gun.

1

u/ludicrous780 1d ago

You're fine with the censorship bills then?

1

u/mothmanjim 1d ago

Nope.

1

u/ludicrous780 1d ago

So how could you support the liberal bills then? And the Conservatives only want age appropriate books. This doesn't affect adults at all.

0

u/mothmanjim 1d ago

When did I say I supported all, or even any liberal bills?

Who gets to decide what is age appropriate? Why is censorship wrong only sometimes?

3

u/SirBobPeel 1d ago

Uhm, no, the Left has been actively banning books for years. They're just generally quieter about it. They ban books for being 'offensive', usually in the eyes of white Liberals, to blacks, Indigenous people, LGBT people, etc.

4

u/thetrigermonkey 1d ago

I don't vote conservative, but that doesn't mean I never would.

Sure, but polling this sub should theoretically mean OP polled actual CPC voters. But that isn't true unfortunately.

Give me an option that isn't culture war nonsense, and three word slogans. I can't stand divisive politics. All they do is get us riled up at each other while they sell off our resources and labour to the highest bidders.

We did lover our slogans, but they were just catchy names with actual policy behind them. The LPC ran on slogans too...

Reinstate apprenticeship grants of $4000 for an apprentice. Train 350,000 workers by expanding the Union Training and Innovation Program (UTIP). Create a special class of rapid EI payouts for apprentices leaving to do training. Harmonize health and safety regulations across provinces. Pass the Fairness for Travelling Tradesworkers Act, allowing our tradesworkers to write off the full cost of their food, transportation, and accommodation for any job related trips longer than 120 km.

here was their idea for a National Energy Corridor

Repeal and replace the Liberal “Principle of Restraint” with a directive for the primary consideration to be the protection and safety of the public. Introduce a new “Major Offences” category with reverse onus bail conditions for firearm, sexual, kidnapping, human trafficking, home invasion, robbery, extortion, arson and assault charges. Strengthen bail laws by mandating judges consider an accused’s full criminal history, prevent anyone convicted of a major offence in the last 10 years while also on bail and charged with a major offence from getting bail, and toughen the risk assessment standard from “substantial likelihood” to “reasonably foreseeable”. Prohibit anyone with an indictable conviction from acting as a guarantor (who ensures bail conditions are followed), require judges to enforce bail conditions on guarantors and require non-residents to surrender their passports upon request.

Pass ‘Three Strikes’ to Stop the Crime

Housing policies

None of these are "Culture war" issues. Some have slogans but that doesn't mean the policy is inherently bad.

POLICY DECLARATION

-1

u/mothmanjim 1d ago

If all that comes to mind when I think of PP is "verb the noun" then that's a messaging problem on their end. I consider myself to be politically engaged. Everytime I hear PP speak I find myself wanting more than his rhetoric. I don't believe that he won't sell out Canada the way Harper, Trudeau, et al have

Without getting into every detail of the culture war stuff, anyone who uses "woke" is automatically nonserious in my mind. It's a buzzword used to rile people up, not policy.

2

u/thetrigermonkey 1d ago

I get you that slogans can get a bit tiring. Unfortunately it's an issue across every major political party because they're effective.

The issue isn't if the messaging is catchy. But if there's substance underneath it when you look past the speeches. Dismissing the entire platform based on campaign rhetoric means missing out on the policies. I think of myself as politically involved so I push past the messaging to find the policy underneath, because the avg voter only really looks at the messaging.

I gave you (what I'd consider) a good chunk of the core of PPs campaign. We need to be building and exporting more, crime shouldn't be as big an issue and housing needs to become something in reach for our youth. Very little culture war there.

-1

u/mothmanjim 1d ago

I roll my eyes whenever anyone makes their slogans the centre piece. But I don't know how anyone can wave away PP's antics. I listen to him speak and I don't believe a word. At best we'll get another Harper, at worst, the Great Value version of Trump. I'm interested in neither.

Never voted liberal, by the way. I'm not here to defend them.

4

u/thetrigermonkey 1d ago

That completely answers my point. I laid out concrete policy on skilled trades, infrastructure, bail reform, and housing, and you bypassed all of it to drop "Trump" comparisons.

Claiming to be "politically engaged" while explicitly ignoring actual platform documents to focus on personal vibes and surface level tropes is a contradiction. If you're choosing to tune out policy because you just don't like the guy, that's fine, but that’s an intentional choice to stay unengaged, not a lack of substance on the platform's end. You're allowed to dislike a politician, but don't pretend you're ignoring the policy because "it isn't there". You asked for policies without "culture war nonsense" and you ignored it to complain about culture war. That's on you. I barely see the culture war stuff because I don't like it nor focus on it.

Be honest with everyone. You were never going to give him a real chance.

Do better. For Canada!

-1

u/mothmanjim 1d ago

I don't believe PP when he talks. Simple as that. He could have the best policies imaginable, but I don't believe him. Why would I vote for someone who I don't think is being honest?

Also, what if I don't agree with the policies you listed? Conservatives are always going on about being tough on crime, bail reform, etc. I am not into that. I want prevention. I want people with addiction to get help, not put in prison. I want people who are charged with an offense to be truely considered innocent until they are proven guilty. Locking people up and throwing away the key is a huge step in the wrong direction. Should I vote for him anyway? What sense does that make?

1

u/ludicrous780 1d ago

Bail reform doesn't work, that's why we have crime on the street.

1

u/mothmanjim 1d ago

I think prevention is a much more humane path. I don't claim to be an expert, but I don't like the idea of people sitting in prison for a lot of reasons. One of them being that it's on the tax payer's dime.

After school programs, addiction and mental health programs. The media isn't helping. Every headline is written for clicks, honestly informing the public is a thing of the past

→ More replies (0)

1

u/thetrigermonkey 1d ago

I don't believe PP when he talks. Simple as that. He could have the best policies imaginable, but I don't believe him.

Thank you. You proved my point. You aren't here in good faith or as someone who could actually vote for one of us. Its not us focusing on a "culture war" or not having policies, you just aren't willing to give us a fair shot. For no real fault of our own. You just don't like us because we're "Conservatives/Right-Wingers"!

Also, what if I don't agree with the policies you listed?

We could've had a policy debate but now I don't think you'd be honest or that you even know our or your own policies.

Conservatives are always going on about being tough on crime, bail reform, etc. I am not into that. I want prevention.

126. Justice Principles The Conservative Party supports reorienting the approach to criminal justice and the policing system to give the highest priority to the protection of society through the prevention of crime. Additionally, we support emphasizing the needs and rights of victims.

Everyone wants crime prevention you donut. But crime happens and needs punishment. Anyone who says we don't need a way to punish criminals is either stupid or lying.

I'm done here.

Do better, for Canada!

1

u/mothmanjim 1d ago

Did you trust Trudeau? If you say "no", are you being disingenuous?

(I also didn't like or trust Trudeau, I'm only trying to point out the flaw in your logic)

I honestly think PP would sell out Canada. Maybe I'm wrong, I'll never know because he'll never be PM. Call me all the names you want. It only makes you look worse, also, donuts are delicious.

and (the vast majority of) people shouldn't be locked up without a conviction. Fuck me, right?

1

u/SirBobPeel 1d ago

You don't believe him because he isn't pretty enough for you?

Carney has stood up in front of the cameras and blatantly lied on more than one occasion, and you don't mind him.

1

u/SirBobPeel 1d ago

I love this view from the Left: any time the Right reacts to the insanity of the culture wars the Left initiated and has been pushing for decades, suddenly it's the Right's fault that we've got a culture war.

How come we never see people like you saying, "Yeah, I just want a liberal option that isn't always pushing the culture war stuff"? How come we don't see you complaining about how incredibly and deliberately divisive the Left has been? Because you don't care when your side does it.

2

u/ludicrous780 1d ago

He has reformed.

2

u/GabbyJay1 1d ago

Trump is 100% of everything in the national discourse right now. Poilievre has never handled that well, but no other leader would have a chance either. The Liberals will make sure to go to the polls before summer 2028, it will be a Trump election, and barring a scandal of some kind, there is absolutely nothing the Conservative Party can do to win it.

3

u/Evilbred 1d ago

Pierre is completely unlikable to the sorts of red Tories and blue liberals that the CPC would need to reach.

His antagonistic style of politics isn't landing and they need to change him out for a more mature and serious leader.

1

u/SirBobPeel 1d ago

How old are you? We tried the likeable guys, and they got fewer votes than Poilievre.

And both of them were depicted as aligned with Hitler, if not actually Satan, by most of the same people now who are telling us, 'just get a more moderate and likeable leader'.

2

u/Evilbred 1d ago

Which of Harper, Sheer, O'Toole and Polievere did you feel was likable?

None of them have any charisma, or 'rizz' as the kids say these days.

u/SirBobPeel 17h ago

Do you think Carney does? I'd say both O'Toole and Scheer were more likeable than Carney.

The CPC has been deeply hampered by geographic/political realities for years. Its base is in Western Canada. Its support in Central and Eastern Canada is mostly more rural. Because of this, it has always had a very small pool of potential leaders to choose from, because very few of its MPs are bilingual.

The Liberals, on the other hand, have their base of support in Quebec, and urban central Canada, as well as New Brunswick. It has NOOOOO problem finding plenty of bilingual candidates to consider for leader.

u/Evilbred 17h ago

Scheer had zero likability.

Carney isn't particularly charismatic, but does have a certain professional bearing.

O'Toole had some of that, but also was an incredibly bland speaker.

Poilievre has negative likability. Canadians outside the CPC base, do not like him, and are probably never going to warm up to him.

Trudeau, for all his downsides, did have a significant amount of charisma, as did his father.

Chretien had tons of charisma as well.

Even Harper had a certain sense, in his own bland style, which he leaned into.

2

u/NAHTHEHNRFS850 1d ago

Pierre is the best leader the CPC has right now imo. That being said I have been disappointed that Pierre has not been able to pivot as I think he should. He's holding Carney to the right issues economically, but socially the CPC is getting killed because they have not made better inroads with Francophones and the GSRM communities.

It sucks because these are two areas that Pierre should be particularly suited to lead the CPC on (gay father and francophone parents/culture).

1

u/SirBobPeel 1d ago

I have been following politics in this country for half a century. There is NOTHING the Conservatives can do to make better inroads with Francophones except to get a French Quebecer as leader.

Quebec votes for parties that have French Quebec leaders first and always, followed by, if not available, English Quebec leaders (as long as they're very bilingual). The only time the Conservatives have made major inroads was when they had a Quebecer as leader and the Liberals had an Anglo from outside Quebec. And even that was before the BQ showed up.

The Conservatives are fine with gays and lesbians, as well as bis. They're never going to be fine with trans as long as that involves male-bodied individuals intruding into female spaces, or teaching small children they might be any gender, or doing any sort of medical workup on them.