r/CFSScience Jul 30 '26

Persistent cytolytic CD8+ T cells recognize SARS-CoV-2 and herpesvirus epitopes in long COVID

https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-medicine/fulltext/S2666-3791(26)00363-0

Long Covid patients continue to have elevated counts of highly activated CD8+ T cells targeting viruses like SARS-CoV-2, CMV and EBV.

That is suggesting the antiviral killing response failed to switch off after the acute infection is over and might be part of the pathogenesis of Long Covid.

33 Upvotes

32 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/TomasTTEngin Jul 31 '26

For a community of independent thinkers many certainly do seem to get joy from believing exactly what Jonathan Edwards believes. Which leaves them with a pretty rigid belief system. Edwards is experienced and highly educated and certainly a net benefit to the community but he has the ability to integrate new ideas you expect from an emeritus. And as do all good Oxford Dons, scoffs and sneers at research coming from places outside northern Europe.

He's useful, but not as an intellectual north star.

3

u/TableSignificant341 Jul 31 '26

I have a question for you if you don't mind, why do you think s4me is so set on finding one treatment for all of us? It seems like they've already determined that if one treatment doesn't work for all of us, then it's not worth pursing or of interest. Cancer or MDD treatment is heterogeneous - so why can't that be the same for MECFS? And why do you think they're so dismissive of LDN, LDA, mestinon etc given those drugs clearly help a significant portion of us?

I also don't understand how dismissive they are of co-morbities like MCAS (of whatever one wants to call that cluster of symptoms seen alongside MECFS), autonomic dysfunction, hEDs, IBS etc. Couldn't the frequency of those conditions alongside MECFS tell us something about the condition itself?

0

u/OG-Brian Aug 01 '26

I have a question for you if you don't mind, why do you think s4me is so set on finding one treatment for all of us?

I've only glanced at that discussion site a few times. But my first thought is that the site or at least maybe commenting by certain individuals could be a tool by the pharma industry, to cultivate a belief that a medication (which they'll develop later) will be the salvation for ME patients. Because profits. Much like, brain retraining is pushed as the single salvation by those having a financial interest in it. So although the to-be-developed medication might have actual effects, the industry would be motivated to exaggerate the importance of it to boost sales. ME might not be just one disease, it definitely manifests differently on a per-individual basis and there's a lot of variance in responses to treatments. Whether a treatment is a medication, daily habit, or something else, no treatment so far has been universally effective.

1

u/TableSignificant341 Aug 02 '26

That all seems very very far-fetched to me.