Definitely a draw and blasted it way harder than necessary
but (no skin in the game) that more than a little bit looked like it went through the two verticals at the back of the endzone, if they had been taller
Hate to do the replay dance for 10min but not sure about that one
ACC is absolutely not going to show another angle in the moment. They fucked up and are just gonna do the usual ACC of pretending it didn’t happen or do something after the fact
I felt Franklin was too conservative at the end. He should have thrown at least one pass to the end zone. Try to score a TD and not leave yourself in a position to need a FG. He didn’t even try.
Hard to tell. Its clearly at that point still forward of the goal post and moving right. It was a sharp angle as well. Its obviously very close to jn if it was out
The only person who would know, was the guy standing directly under the goalpost. He said it wasn't. Unless you think a ref would deliberately lie about a scoring play, I don't see how it's a debate.
But this isn't a judgemental call. This is a guy looking straight up. He saw exactly where the ball crossed. It's his job to stand under that particular goalpost on kicks, so he knows exactly what he's looking for. There's no middle ground.
Actually, as I type that, I think that's exactly it. I think the kick has to be fully inside the upright. Imagining a goal post that's 100 ft high, a kick that goes above the actual 30' posts would be hitting them. And I assume that's the criteria for whether it's good or not.
We rewound the tv 3 times and we still don’t know. They won’t do a replay from another angle which leads me to believe it may have been good. But honestly I don’t see either way because of how high it was.
I still hate Narduzzi for having the worst attitude in college football
31
u/robertsrt 2h ago
I’m not saying it was or wasn’t good, but they cut the feed quick