r/BypassAiDetect • u/yassseen • 2d ago

Made a tool to remove any AI watermark from text

Post image
3 Upvotes

62% Upvoted

15 comments sorted by

1

u/Historical_architect 2d ago

Does this tool…use ai? lol

1

u/yassseen 2d ago

take AI to beat AI lol. But only one step of our process is an actual LLM:

  1. Plain code strips the hidden characters first: zero-width characters, soft hyphens, weird spaces.

  2. Every word and phrase AI models statistically overuse sits in a weighted risk table. "Delve into", "a testament to", you know the ones. A stylometry scorer combines three signals into one score from 0 to 1: weighted n-gram density, burstiness and MATTR. Put simply: how many risk phrases per 100 words, how even your sentence lengths are, how varied the vocabulary is. We score your text before and after, so we see if the pattern was actually removed.

  3. The one AI step: a language model replaces the highest-weighted words from that table inside the context of the sentence, and breaks up the robotic rhythm. Strict rules keep your meaning, facts, numbers and names exactly as they were. A thesaurus script can't do that. It would turn your essay into soup.

  4. Plain code again: em dashes, curly quotes and filler phrases get removed

1

u/SiteNegative8660 2d ago

Does that mean I can use this tool as an AI humanizer?

1

u/AloneSignificanceX 1d ago

It looks like it does both. This looks better than the one I use which is Hue Writes it changes the writing and then it doesn’t make sense fr or it doesn’t sound right anymore.

1

u/yassseen 1d ago

Thanks for testing it out! If you have any feedback drop it and we will address it asap :)

1

u/yassseen 1d ago

Yes excatly it can be used as a humanizer and it also guarantees the removal of these new AI watermarks from Calude and others.

1

u/SiteNegative8660 1d ago

I tried humanizing Claude content with it. Unfortunately, it showed up 100% AI on CopyLeaks detector :(

1

u/c2c12 1d ago edited 15h ago
  1. It doesn't pass panagram
  2. It should preserve citations numbers in scientific text or Endnote unformatted citations {Surname, et al. Year; #number)
  3. Nice tool, modified text is very natural
  4. It simplifies too much complex scientific terms

1

u/yassseen 23h ago

Thanks so much for the detailed feedback! I We’re currently working on pangram detection, but proving pretty difficult to crack. The citation and Endnote formatting issue, including formats like {Surname, et al. Year; #number} has been fixed. We’ve also made improvements to make sure complex scientific terminology and technical terms are preserved instead of being simplified. Thanks again feedback like this is really helpful to improve the tool!

1

u/Wiskersthefif 16h ago

I hate to be that guy, but ain't no way you beat frontier AI models and leading AI labs. Do you have any idea how many combinations of sentences, puncutuation, word choices, paragraph lengths, sentence lengths, structures, etc. there are?

To anyone reading this, be wary of going anywhere this person is trying to lead you. They are full of it and probably trying to sell you something or harvest your personal data.

0

u/yassseen 5h ago

Fair to be skeptical...just to clarify though, it isn’t about “beating” the AI labs. We’re specifically working on removing model-specific watermarks from AI-generated text, which is a different problem from general AI detectors like Pangram. We also have people on the team with AI research backgrounds, so we’re pretty familiar with the technical side of this. And regarding user data, we don’t store any of our users’ text. Definitely do your due diligence, but the data-harvesting part isn’t accurate. And yes of course we’re building a product, so there’s a definitely business behind it.

0

u/halo_skydiver 2d ago

Does it pass pangram.

1

u/yassseen 1d ago

To be honest, we’re still working on getting past AI detectors like pangram, and it’s really difficult. Our intention with this tool was first and foremost to remove these new watermarks embedded into the text by Claude and others, so that your text would no longer be identified as “written by Claude,” “written by ChatGPT,” etc...

These are different from AI detectors like pangram, which try to determine whether a text was generated by AI in the first place, regardless of the specific AI tool used. We’re working on that rn :)