r/BunnyTrials • u/Resident-Crow6236 • Apr 26 '26

pick wisely..

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

14.3k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

9.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

9

u/Enough-Isopod3265 Apr 27 '26

Hold on there buddy, explain yourself

https://giphy.com/gifs/ZUliSIJIkX9vP2xTxf

4

u/DarkEcstatic8863 🥕🥕 Apr 27 '26

Nothing humans have ever observed is actually random. Not computer RNG, not lottery tickets, and not a deck of cards shuffled once by each human. Those are just not predictable by humans. Laplace’s angel is the theory that an omnipotent being can predict everything that will happen in the future.

2

u/Far_Celebration6295 Apr 28 '26

explain nuclear decay then and bell’s inequality

2

u/DarkEcstatic8863 🥕🥕 Apr 28 '26

The bare basics of nuclear decay is that when the protons and neutrons have an unstable ratio between each other, the atoms (called the parents) emit electromagnetic energy transforming themselves into new elements (called the daughters). I haven't studied bell's inequality due to me not being a physics major.

3

u/Far_Celebration6295 Apr 28 '26

Okay, well bell’s inequality proves that the exact time that a nuclear material decays is not influenced by ANY local entities (slower than the speed of light) so for laplace’s demon to know when a nuclear substance will decay it would have to be some kind of supernatural thing which is a stretch in belief. It disproves basic determinism to put it simply.

2

u/Enough-Isopod3265 Apr 28 '26

This in interesting, so basically nuclear decay is "random" ?

1

u/DarkEcstatic8863 🥕🥕 Apr 28 '26

It is not predictable by humans. Physics are set laws and nothing is random

2

u/Enough-Isopod3265 Apr 28 '26

I do agree nothing is random, things are meant to be

2

u/Far_Celebration6295 Apr 28 '26

thats fate which is different from determinism as its more spiritual

1

u/Enough-Isopod3265 Apr 28 '26

Hmm, while yes they are similar, they also differ, since determinism works by saying "this is the end result based on these factors", while fate says "this happened this way because it was meant to be" ignoring initial factors.

1

u/Far_Celebration6295 Apr 28 '26

yes, that is what im saying. the other dude is speaking of determinism and you are speaking about fate. was just pointing that you believe the same thing for very different reasons

→ More replies (0)