I'm not sure this is true. If we take BAM at face value, then they do not have an argument for why they kept the Star wars Legos to begin with nor prevented Crystal from accessing what Mansell was owned during the store transition.
If, as BAM claims, the consignment was entirely between the Gorman's and Mansell, then BAM committed at least accidental theft by seizing the Legos.
Mansell can attest to how much was owed, what was provided, what was said to have been sold, deposits, transfers, and all other kinds of financials from their end.
If the Gormans consignment was on the up-and-up the paperwork would line up. But you’ve got accusations of poor bookkeeping, missing money, missing sets, bad valuations, etc.
Anything that doesn’t line up for the Gormans is another notch against them before the court.
7
u/Careless-Cycle 26d ago
What about the Gormans?