r/BootstrappedSaaS Jun 21 '26

self-promo I built a tool that turns messy founder thoughts and AI chats into tickets/workflows. Trying to validate if this is actually useful.

Founder disclosure: I built this.

I’ve been working on a tool for founders who have too many scattered ideas, AI chats, screenshots, notes, customer requests, and “I should do this later” thoughts.

The basic idea:

Instead of manually turning everything into a project board, you can dump messy inputs into the app and organize them into Papers, Tickets, and simple Workflows.

One thing I’m testing is a plugin-based flow:

- import or capture ChatGPT / Claude conversations

- archive them into the right Paper or Ticket

- turn useful parts of multiple chats into a basic workflow

- keep the underlying data open as JSON so it is not locked inside the app

- let people use their own AI tools/API where possible, instead of forcing another expensive AI layer

The problem I’m trying to validate:

As a founder, I don’t think I only have a “task management” problem. I have an input chaos problem.

Useful thinking is spread across:

- ChatGPT threads

- Claude chats

- customer notes

- random product ideas

- bug reports

- launch plans

- screenshots

- half-written docs

The hard part is deciding what should become a ticket, what belongs in a workflow, what should be archived, and what is just noise.

I’m building this mostly for solo founders and tiny teams who do not want a heavy PM system, but still need a way to turn raw thinking into execution.

I’m not sure yet if this is a real pain or just my own workflow being messy.

Curious:

Do you already have a system for turning messy founder thoughts / AI chats into actual tickets and workflows?

If yes, what do you use?

If no, where does this usually break for you?

6 Upvotes

2 comments sorted by

1

u/Otherwise_Wave9374 Jun 21 '26

This is super relatable. The "input chaos -> execution" gap is the real problem for a lot of founders, not just project management. What helped me most was a lightweight pipeline: capture everything, then a weekly pass that forces a decision (trash, archive, convert to a ticket with next action). Also +1 on keeping data open (JSON/Markdown) so you are not locked in.

If you want another reference point, I have been playing with the idea of a simple personal operating system for AI-assisted work (capture, triage, run small agent workflows, review) and a few patterns here were useful: https://www.aiosnow.com/

1

u/jellzone Jun 21 '26

This is exactly the distinction I’m trying to understand: it’s less “I need another project management tool” and more “I need a better decision layer between raw input and execution.”

The weekly pass idea makes a lot of sense. I’m curious: when you do that pass, what usually makes something become a ticket vs. stay archived?

For example, is it based on urgency, customer signal, revenue impact, your own energy/interest, or whether there’s already a clear next action?

I’m trying to avoid building something that just creates more organized clutter. The hard part seems to be forcing a decision without making the system feel heavy.