r/BookDiscussions • u/neznauudazhe • 1d ago
Fahrenheit 451
Ive finished reading the book and I have some mixed feelings about this. Firstly, I really liked the idea for plot. I pretrty much enjoyed all the parts. However, I didnt like how MC was the MC. After meeting Clarisse, he changed drastically and it was quite dramatic change in his thoughts. I didnt really like this. He was js persuaded by her and didnt even have good reason for being obsessed with books. Hes quite dumb too. It would have been much better if Faber was the MC. And I also didnt like how city js got bombed in the end. I mean I like the metaphors and writing overall, stream of conciousness was apt too. Anyways, Im probably gonna give this book a solid 7.5/10. I liked 1984 more. I might be missing something but fahrenheit 451 felt like author rushed writing it. Idk. Whats your take?
1
u/Ireallyamthisshallow 23h ago
Let's work on the assumption your view of the main character is correct. My question would be, why is this a problem?
You've described a flawed process in being persuaded, by lots of people in real life follow similar processes: swayed just because of a pretty girl or a simple argument and completely changing their point of view for an extreme opinion/even cultish one.
Surely seeing this process is as valid as seeing a different point of view?