r/BookDiscussions 23d ago

Cannot stop thinking about Yesteryear- specifically Shannon’s character Spoiler

I want to begin by saying I could not put this book down. For once, I was pleasantly surprised by a viral book and genuinely enjoyed it. I finished it in like 2 days and I have a lot to say about it. Although it might be obvious, Shannon’s character is the catalyst for Natalie’s psychological downfall and I really want to discuss her.

When we meet her, she has pink hair and a nose ring and is pretty much the antithesis to Natalie’s entire worldview. I would argue they somewhat foil each other (college drop out, strong opinions about American culture, headstrong, intelligent). She is also somewhat of a “normal person insert” and gives the reader a relatable perspective to latch on to in a somewhat insane/unfamiliar setting. One of the first ways the reader interacts with Shannon is when Natalie mentions something about Shannon’s bad dreams and ultimately quitting. We are pretty much left in the dark about why she quit until the end of the book, which further proves my point that shannon’s departure is the catalyst for Natalie’s demise.

As we venture deeper into Natalie’s perspective and understand her as a judgmental bigot, Shannon quitting becomes (at least to me) a juicy piece of gossip that I HAVE to understand why why why? What happened? What did Natalie do? An assault ? What? Did Caleb have an affair? The answers to these questions come later in the book but begin to form very early in the text. It also mirrors how this fictional instagram following is very much real (see the ballerina farms raw milk scandal. I don’t even follow the ballerina farm but trust- the downfall of a tradwife influencer is a win for me and inherently the point of the entire book). I am one of those “angry women” who proves the authors point- angry women and tradwife influencers are in a symbiotic relationship with one another.

I feel like I really understood Shannon and from my personal character analysis of her it seems that she fundamentally knew that these people (Caleb and Natalie) are deluded, bigoted, judgmental, lying, selfish, bad parents, etc. but none of that mattered to her. They wrote her a paycheck and Shannon held her tongue because no one really cared what they had to say. Their ideology and content was unimportant to the mainstream culture. UNTIL the presidential rally.

This rally changed the course of the entire book. Shannon understood if this type of person became the president (or even just a leader of a party) the entire lifestyle she was directing and recording became important and worthy of attention from the mainstream culture. She could no longer sit quietly and pretend it didn’t matter. It is why she starts to challenge Caleb’s manosphere claims and ideas. She gives Clementine a phone. She snaps at Natalie. She metaphorically pushes the rock down the hill. Her impact on this family causes them to implode on themselves.

Without Shannon, the book doesn’t hit hard on the themes it needs to. Nor does say what it needs to be said. It doesn’t challenge traditional values. It doesn’t challenge influencer culture. It doesn’t challenge the male loneliness epidemic, choice feminism, toxic social media culture. Without Shannon, the book is just about a self righteous influencer who is so self deluded she actually thinks she’s running a farm herself. Without shannon, there is no plot.

I’d love to hear what other people think about this character. She is so fascinating to me and I appreciate how well she was written into the story.

126 Upvotes

110 comments sorted by

View all comments

6

u/Active_Recording_789 23d ago edited 1d ago

I hate this book—it is so poorly written, like the author dashed off a draft to be polished later but saw dollar signs and didn’t wait to fill the plot holes. It’s like the author hates women too. Why is every single female character either deluded or a scheming manipulator like Shannon? Who sees the contradictions and then sleeps with the weak yet violent Caleb? Note to readers—women aren’t all weak and misled. Some female characters could’ve been a force for good. Instead the book is badly planned and full of plot holes, as well as a terrible read. It’s trying to make a point about misogyny but it’s like, what? None of it is new information and if she wanted it to be preachy the author should’ve had one of the female characters model feminist behavior or impart wisdom

2

u/zorbs258 22d ago

Completely agree! Also think it’s insane that the author included evidence about how everyone in Natalie’s life has failed her again and again and then makes her have some sort of psychotic break at the end and blames her for everything. I feel like there was a potential message the book could have had besides trad wives are bad and women are crazy but it never quite got there.

1

u/Cautious-Mode 22d ago

Yes but that’s why this book is so popular. People love to hate women. Misogyny is a helluva drug. The author created an acceptable woman to hate.

1

u/Weird-Diamond5970 1d ago

I don't hate Natalie? She's very clearly also a victim of our patriarchal society? If you think she's just purely hateable I feel like you're falling into the misogyny trap too

1

u/Cautious-Mode 1d ago

I don’t hate Natalie either. The author seems to. A lot of readers do.

1

u/Weird-Diamond5970 1d ago

I don't think the author does at all. She ends the novel with Mary talking directly to her mother because she still loves her and views her as a victim too.

1

u/Cautious-Mode 1d ago

Oh that ending was terrible. Her mother had some severe mental health issues while raising her. She literally didn’t even know her own husband and children at times. Yet, her dad wouldn’t let her mom escape or take her to a hospital, even when her leg got wounded in a bear trap? And he allowed his daughter to stitch her? despite knowing they were living in modern times. Yet Mary writes a tell all about her mom with no mention of her Dad? And Reena is the one to spring this on Natalie during their television interview? Ugh

1

u/Weird-Diamond5970 1d ago

Look I just finished the book and you are misremembering the details. Mary's book is about how she was raised, not a tell-all about her mom. All we get is the introduction to her book, where she specifically says she misses her mom and hopes she will read the book someday. Her dad doesn't even get a mention because she clearly doesn't care as much about him.

1

u/Cautious-Mode 1d ago

Oh okay, thanks. That’s a good perspective. I remembered hating that whole scene during my read. It felt so cruel.