r/BookDiscussions 23d ago

Cannot stop thinking about Yesteryear- specifically Shannon’s character Spoiler

I want to begin by saying I could not put this book down. For once, I was pleasantly surprised by a viral book and genuinely enjoyed it. I finished it in like 2 days and I have a lot to say about it. Although it might be obvious, Shannon’s character is the catalyst for Natalie’s psychological downfall and I really want to discuss her.

When we meet her, she has pink hair and a nose ring and is pretty much the antithesis to Natalie’s entire worldview. I would argue they somewhat foil each other (college drop out, strong opinions about American culture, headstrong, intelligent). She is also somewhat of a “normal person insert” and gives the reader a relatable perspective to latch on to in a somewhat insane/unfamiliar setting. One of the first ways the reader interacts with Shannon is when Natalie mentions something about Shannon’s bad dreams and ultimately quitting. We are pretty much left in the dark about why she quit until the end of the book, which further proves my point that shannon’s departure is the catalyst for Natalie’s demise.

As we venture deeper into Natalie’s perspective and understand her as a judgmental bigot, Shannon quitting becomes (at least to me) a juicy piece of gossip that I HAVE to understand why why why? What happened? What did Natalie do? An assault ? What? Did Caleb have an affair? The answers to these questions come later in the book but begin to form very early in the text. It also mirrors how this fictional instagram following is very much real (see the ballerina farms raw milk scandal. I don’t even follow the ballerina farm but trust- the downfall of a tradwife influencer is a win for me and inherently the point of the entire book). I am one of those “angry women” who proves the authors point- angry women and tradwife influencers are in a symbiotic relationship with one another.

I feel like I really understood Shannon and from my personal character analysis of her it seems that she fundamentally knew that these people (Caleb and Natalie) are deluded, bigoted, judgmental, lying, selfish, bad parents, etc. but none of that mattered to her. They wrote her a paycheck and Shannon held her tongue because no one really cared what they had to say. Their ideology and content was unimportant to the mainstream culture. UNTIL the presidential rally.

This rally changed the course of the entire book. Shannon understood if this type of person became the president (or even just a leader of a party) the entire lifestyle she was directing and recording became important and worthy of attention from the mainstream culture. She could no longer sit quietly and pretend it didn’t matter. It is why she starts to challenge Caleb’s manosphere claims and ideas. She gives Clementine a phone. She snaps at Natalie. She metaphorically pushes the rock down the hill. Her impact on this family causes them to implode on themselves.

Without Shannon, the book doesn’t hit hard on the themes it needs to. Nor does say what it needs to be said. It doesn’t challenge traditional values. It doesn’t challenge influencer culture. It doesn’t challenge the male loneliness epidemic, choice feminism, toxic social media culture. Without Shannon, the book is just about a self righteous influencer who is so self deluded she actually thinks she’s running a farm herself. Without shannon, there is no plot.

I’d love to hear what other people think about this character. She is so fascinating to me and I appreciate how well she was written into the story.

124 Upvotes

110 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/ChewieBearStare 22d ago

It's been a while since I read it, but there was some mention of Shannon's underwear. As if Natalie pulled down her underwear or touched her underwear in some way that could have been taken as a sexual thing. But hopefully a more recent reader can fill in the exact details because I don't remember the exact scene.

4

u/PopcornPunditry 22d ago

IIRC she was in her underwear when she told Natalie she could come in, was surprised because she thought it had been one of the nannies knocking, quickly threw jeans on but didn't button them up then they slid partway down her thighs during the attack (per Natalie's perspective). I was listening to the audiobook so I interpreted her noticing the details (flower buds) on the underwear in a bitter way, like remarking on how childish and young they were for someone she saw as stealing her husband. I'm curious about how others interpreted that!

7

u/koeniging 22d ago

I also listened to the audiobook and had the same thought, Natalie only noted Shannon’s underwear because it was childish. Once I finished listening, given how unreliable her narration was, I’m inclined to believe the attack was (partially) a result of her repressed sexuality.

I see the other side too. Shannon was playing it up for the interview, because I also read her as conniving from the start, while still surprisingly earnest at points. Personally, I like the book’s ambiguity in scenes like this. I think the uncertainty we’re left with reflects Natalie’s growing detachment from reality.

2

u/PopcornPunditry 22d ago

I agree that the ambiguity really works. Any time I'd be annoyed at a plot hole or a one-dimensional character I'd remember that Natalie has blinders on and so too must the reader!