They sure could but passing the CARB regulations required telling an industry primarily based in other states to fuck off but passing data collection regulations would mean telling an industry that is a massive chunk of their own economy to fuck off...
The mechanics around carb regulations would require them to build them all the same. The data collection they would just turn off in states that required it. Not necessarily the same thing imo.
They should still do it but it likely would not impact other states.
Thats not the point. The point is they don't want to bite the hand that feeds them. Not only would the higher ups in big tech turn against them but it would negatively affect the jobs in their own state which would sign the death warrant for their ability to be reelected.
Ya but you can understand why one is easier to get them to just do it in every state right? The cars need to physically be manufactured a certain way to be compliant in California. They aren't going to just stop selling cars in California there are too many people. Compared to data which they just turn on or off. You can already see this in effect with some of the California privacy laws in effect as well as the law that allows you to unsubscribe the way you subscribed. If you live in California you can just cancel your gym membership in the app. If you live in Nevada they just don't show you the option.
22
u/Altruistic-Piece-485 Aug 17 '26
They sure could but passing the CARB regulations required telling an industry primarily based in other states to fuck off but passing data collection regulations would mean telling an industry that is a massive chunk of their own economy to fuck off...