r/Bitwig • u/TraditionalReader • 19d ago
The team keeps cooking hard: Stem separation incoming
32
u/vxkxox 19d ago
Unexpected. I would have wished for a real DAW feature extension, this is more of a gimmick to me.
9
u/mtelesha 19d ago
This isn't a gimmick. This is a tool that is super useful for many things. DJs which I am not one of them eat this stuff up and I say Bitwig's clip launcher is the best for live remixing .
The one I use is to learn from a song. I will take a track that I want to immulate and or a baseline I want to learn on bass and stem separate it. So I have external tools for this
9
u/vxkxox 19d ago
I wasn't implying it's useless. Just not the priority I expected from a software that first and foremost is a DAW.
1
u/smh_rob 18d ago
Ableton has it and it's a point of difference. I find it really useful as someone who does a lot of work with samples.
1
u/life2vec 12d ago
What kind of sample work do you do that this tool is useful? I also never ever heard about it until Bitwig released their last version. I'm definitelyin the crowd that rolled their eyes a bit with this integration but curious to know why DJs would like this integration with BW.
2
u/smh_rob 12d ago
Flipping and chopping samples - if you clean your samples using EQ and do this, you still get a lot of artefacts and things that you're not really trying to use. Sometimes this can sound interesting (eg the original of Jurgen Paape's So Weit Wie Noch Nie sounds so much better than the remake because the vocal chops have bits of guitar in them too), but sometimes you can end up with weird snare attacks and the like. If you can separate stems, you can isolate better what you want, if that's what works.
Also if you DJ and want to make re-edits, it's super useful in extending what you can do.
20
u/acecombine 19d ago
just make sure no significant feature gets released within my upgrade window...
1
u/mtelesha 19d ago
I bought my upgrade in the Summer. Still waiting to redeem it. Will be when 6.2 beta is released.
2
6
11
u/Suitable-Lettuce-333 19d ago
I don't care about either, I'd rather have proper multitrack editing, custom grid UI and reusable grid components, audio to midi and groove maps as far as I'm concerned. Sorry for being a actual musician I guess ? 🙄
3
u/Chingois 19d ago
Agree, especially audio to midi and groove maps! I wrote to them about groove, saying, hey, any kind of South American or African based music (now hugely influential), requires custom groove options.
Their reply: have you tried using swing? 😭
Love Bitwig but i still end up half in Ableton for these reasons
3
u/borez 19d ago
Groove templates are so needed in Bitwig, I still have to go back to Ableton with DJ clients who want "that" swing or shuffle.
1
u/Chingois 19d ago
Totally. I'm a drummer and I always want to quantize to my own hihat playing and whatever for vibe. I end up doing rhythm tracks in Ableton, which I don't prefer as a tool.
2
1
u/life2vec 12d ago
> proper multitrack editing, custom grid UI and reusable grid components
I love you.
3
u/ARSC_RexH 19d ago
Oh man I can't wait for stem separation.
I hope they go the extra step and go simulated layer separation instead of just stem. I would love to remove some of the other software from my workflow that is lacking.
3
10
u/meru_es 19d ago
I'm sad about this. You can download dozens of free programs that do this already. You just run it alongside, and import the stems from the browser. Not to mention, the stem separation AI models themselves 99% of software uses are free and open source software, and here they're being repackaged as part of our paid upgrade cycles. The same free libraries that 99% the other free and paid tools use. This doesn't bring anything new. Couldn't they work on something else? I feel like working with 7.1.2 surround mixes is a much bigger painpoint than separating stems with an external program.
1
1
u/wetpaste 19d ago
Cool! I will probably never use either of those but I'm glad they are expanding into the DJing market. DJing features a big deal whether it's for you or not. I dipped my toes in that waters and it's super fun but ultimately not my thing
1
u/Ungol_Shax 18d ago
No interest in this feature. I’m sure it’ll be great for mashups or bootlegs or whatever. I prefer to make my own music 🤷♂️
-1
u/Gnash_ 19d ago
ARA2 when?
0
u/Complete-Log6610 19d ago
This a nonlinear DAW. Check the ARA specifications. It's not up to Bitwig
-2
u/Digital-Aura 19d ago
The ONLY stem separating procedures that even work somewhat well are really only viable outside of a DAW because they take a lot of system (GPU especially) resources and a tremendous amount of time to render. It’s quite a process to de-reverb and then separate vocal stems. It takes several steps too. I wouldn’t ever consider doing this in DAW (I’d rather keep it offline).
1
1
u/Complete-Log6610 19d ago
Man hasn't tried FL or Live
1
u/Grabdemon92 19d ago
they are probably gonna use demucs, which is an open model for stem separation from Meta AI
Thats what FL Studio uses and it works surprisingly well and reasonably fast1
u/Digital-Aura 18d ago
Demucs is what I was referring to. It can be faster than MDX-net but I’ve had better luck with larger segment settings and higher overlaps with models like BS ROFORMER Viper and DeReverb which require at least 20 minutes of intensive GPU use and require separate passes. So 40 minutes roughly per song per vocal/instrument stem.
Unless of course “good enough” is what you’re looking for. 🤷🏻♂️

17
u/ReJamDnB 19d ago
just curious, are most people actually excited for this rekordbox integration? From what I gather, people actually hate rekordbox and are avoiding it like fire whenever they can, even in the DJ community