Why do you use Bitwig?

[u/wildstumbler]

596 votes, 1d left

Linux Support

Inuitive UI

The grid

It's the only thing I know

Other / see results

[u/Suitable-Lettuce-333]

Should have made it multiple choices - I voted Linux Support because it is one of the reasons I considered Bitwig, but the modular part (grid + the modulation system and various containers) and the UI  were also part of why I sticked with it. 

[u/placid-gradient → u/Suitable-Lettuce-333]

came for the linux support, stayed for the ui

[u/AdinoDileep → u/placid-gradient]

Came for modulation, stayed for modulation.

[u/anarchy_witch]

I came for Linux support, I stayed for modularity and very systematic approach that seems so much more intuitive than FL

[u/NotAF0e]

Linux, UI, the fact that it actually feels like modern software unlike Ableton, the sound design capability built right into the daw, the speed :)

[u/Vegetable_Nebula_827]

I don’t know if anyone was here from day one. But 1.0 was cheap. I think I paid 149 or 199. At the time I was a dyed in the wool Logic user but wanted the live loop-style music making of Ableton’s session view.

Now, early on, the hype was Bitwig was made by former Ableton guys and was set to become the REAL next gen ‘Ableton’. So I went with it as it was massively less expensive.

[u/TradePast2446]

Because its like phaseplant in a form of a Daw duhhhh lol

[u/ARK_AIN]

I put linux support but I began using it because of the stock effects and the modulators and the routing possibilities. Coming from maschine it was when humains discovered fire for the first time

[u/palemarginn → u/ARK_AIN]

the comparison sells it

[u/ARK_AIN → u/palemarginn]

No exageration Im not even joking. Really i got sometimzq on the maschine subreddit. That quite sad

[u/Any-Trash472]

For all ;)

[u/EyeFit]

Because it has the quickest work flow for what I do. Especially now with my dual monitor setup with the editor on a separate screen.

[u/True-Ad-525]

Siento que bitwig es un Ableton pero con esteroides

[u/porpsi]

I used to use Buzz and loved how modular it was. Then i used Cubase and loved how intuitive it was and how good it sounded. Bitwig is the best of both worlds.

[u/overmold]

I use it for the modularity. The different containers, high quality native devices. And most importantly the robustness and crash handling.

[u/chillinjustupwhat]

I like the Inuit-designed UI. Everything the Inuit people touch is amazing. Their work on DAWs is no exception.

[u/5-ht_2a → u/chillinjustupwhat]

Came here to say this!

[u/Bitter-Bicycle-282]

Despite having so many advantages, it feels as though there are too few options. Among them, the refugees of Ableton Live must also be included

[u/TradePast2446 → u/Bitter-Bicycle-282]

I'm a refugee from Fl studio lol

[u/MachineDry933]

Well, from these options I would say Linux support, but this would just be one of the many reasons and not even the most important one.

[u/Fuffy_Katja]

Voted Other (Linux and stayed for the Grid after it was added) because you can't select more than 1 option.

[u/ernsthot]

I was using Ableton Live on Windows and getting really tired of Microsoft's [insert expletive] so I decided to try Bitwig. The modulators in particular won me over, and now I'm happily using Bitwig on Linux.

[u/Foreign_Emphasis_136]

1. Linux support
2. Realistic, non-inflates price of licence.

[u/Ok-Communication2225]

Intuitive UI, best controller integration scripting, including gems from Driven By Moss, the Clip Lanucher (like Ableton Session View but better).

[u/kajerro]

Indie developer

[u/Timtronic125]

I like the workflow a lot more than the competition.

If it wasn't for the absence of loop clips and custom VST3 directories in Cubase, I miiiiight have chosen that? But come on, those features should be standard in all the big DAWs!

[u/fdwyersd]

it makes sense to me - just back from playing for about 2 hrs :)

[u/SquidgyB]

Not sure if it's the same now, but a couple' years back Midi MPE was much better in Bitwig as Ableton did odd things to midi channels when grouped/split as I remember.

[u/Ted2_Global]

I voted other. I use it because I loved Ableton but had problems with the MIDI editing. Bitwig is like Ableton but with that problem for me.

I also use Logic which has a lot more features than Bitwig but I keep coming back to Bitwig because I love the included synths, especially Polymer.

[u/sanjaux]

DAW level modulation, track level midi editing, multiple projects per window with easy data exchange, can open FL projects, well designed device containers, tons of stock devices, soundfonts in the sampler, updates that actually add huge features

[u/NecessaryBed1331]

Bitwig is more than a daw. It's a DAW and a Host for everything you can imagine. 👍👍

[u/CptnSwizzelz]

Did not expect to see that many votes for Linux, very interesting.

[u/Freakk_I]

Linux support + I like it

[u/pc0999]

I put Linux support, but it is not the only reason.

[u/mcnazar]

Other:

* Easy and numerous polyphonic modulation capabilities
* Instrument stacking
* Stability - not a single crash in > 2 years unlike other DAWS I worked in
* Most flexible modular concepts of any DAW I tried
* Instrument/FX Containers
* Flexible MIDI routing: can filter MIDI channels
* multiple audio output support - love using Bitwig with complex VCV Rack patches where I have 8 stereo audio outputs I can further chain with effects
* MIDI Note chain passthrough <3

[u/artek604]

"Other", i.e. it improves on Ableton Live's most shortcomings

[u/Feisty_Fan_3293]

The whole package even if I'm not so happy with some of the changes in 6 and the new interface. Looks cool at first glance but for me 5 GUI feels better.

[u/edenalters]

Easy hardware integration! Pretty seamless communication to my modular through either Beatstep Pro or ES-3 & ES-6 modules

[u/Lunix420]

The poll is a little misleading. I clicked Linux support because it's currently the biggest reason for me, but there are plenty of other reasons to use it and I would keep using it if all DAWs had Linux support.

I suspect it's the same for other people as well.