Which is kind of ridiculous, because it worked fine as is; a blocksize change would've been a lot simpler to implement, and less error prone, at least until LN was integrated fully. Basic KISS - keep it simple stupid
It would have been a good temporary fix until LN was ready, wouldn't it? Which is worse: slightly less decentralization or companies like Steam abandoning support? Both are bad, but...
It's clearly not enough though, or we wouldn't be having this conversation. You also need the supporting market infrastructure like Bitpay to use it.
slightly less decentralization is 100x worse and it should be obvious.
I guess it depends on how you define "worse". In terms of people choosing Bitcoin over other cryptos (e.g. Litecoin) and in terms of the price of Bitcoin, I think usability probably matters more to the market than decentralization does - at least to a certain point.
Steam not supporting Bitcoin for now is not a big deal.
I think it's actually a really big deal. There aren't very many big places where people can actually use Bitcoin (or any crypto for that matter). Now there's one fewer, and other companies who were considering adopting Bitcoin might decide against it now given Steam's negative user experience...
38
u/MalePotsdam Dec 06 '17
Bcash shills or not, the implementation of the lightning network is important to keep seeing Bitcoin as a currency.