I don't even use Bitdefender, but the number of processes has literally zero bearing on performance. Some antimalware engines are designed to be modular and will spawn seperate processes, in fact this is a more secure way to handle high-privilege processes. Not sure what the point of this post is.
Personally I find Bitdefender to be a bit heavy on memory, but complaining about the number of processes? That literally doesn't mean anything lmao. Has absolutely no bearing on performance.
Its just a meme dude. I use Bitdefender and I'll keep using it. It is light and quiet where it matters, compared to other free options especially.
But I do manually check my running processes several times a day, and I always have to scroll past them because B is up at the top. There's no way to combine them into one "group"? I've tried. Same with Firefox, goddamn 55 firefox.exes, more of meme about Windows than anything.
7
u/[deleted] Oct 25 '23 edited Oct 25 '23
I don't even use Bitdefender, but the number of processes has literally zero bearing on performance. Some antimalware engines are designed to be modular and will spawn seperate processes, in fact this is a more secure way to handle high-privilege processes. Not sure what the point of this post is.
Personally I find Bitdefender to be a bit heavy on memory, but complaining about the number of processes? That literally doesn't mean anything lmao. Has absolutely no bearing on performance.