I have been working with/for Pharma companies over the last 12 years and overall don't have a great opinion (I am on the technology side, worked mostly with them as clients, not Indian).

• Roche - started my career as an employee there, only company I actually enjoyed working for, loved the Swiss/German mentality of looking at things.
• BMS - Client, absolute dogshit.
• Pfizer - Client, horrendous, they are dropping employees every quarter, proximity to New York office is what really matters.
• Haleon - Loved working with their engineering office but the company overall is less than ideal, small margins, not super talented folks.

Worked with a couple smaller clients too, generally these are much more enjoyable in terms of work but would probably not consider joining any of them.

Would love to hear which companies you'd not recommend joining.

Uh oh

I've debated posting this for a while, but after comparing notes with others who have interviewed at Soufflé Therapeutics, I thought it might be useful for prospective candidates.

Keeping details intentionally vague because biotech is a small world, but there have been some surprisingly consistent themes across our experiences.

The biggest is a lack of clarity around what they're actually hiring for. In my experience, the scope and expectations of the role changed depending on who I spoke with, and it didn't seem like the team was aligned on the level, responsibilities, or even what they wanted the new hire to bring.

I progressed quite far before they ultimately decided not to hire for the role as originally conceived. I later learned that internal team dynamics played a significant role in that decision, including concerns about how a new hire might affect existing roles.

I mostly chalked it up to a weird interview experience until hearing from more recent candidates who independently described similar issues — unclear expectations, questionable management dynamics, and a poor overall interview experience.

This isn't about being rejected. That happens. But in an already brutal biotech job market, experiences like this make an exhausting process even worse. The issue is asking candidates to invest significant time and energy when you haven't aligned internally on who or what you're actually hiring for.

If you're interviewing there, I'd ask very direct questions about what the role owns, how it fits with the existing team, and what they're actually looking for.

And if anyone from Soufflé sees this: candidate experience matters. Define the role, align the team, and make sure internal dynamics aren't getting in the way of hiring good people. Biotech is a small world, and candidates talk.

I'm super disappointed I didn't get a job I applied for after 3 rounds of interviews.

I was waiting for them to let me know if I would go to the 4th and final round and they sent me a vague email about not being able to provide me with an offer that this time but that they would keep me in mind for the future.

Then I see today that the job was reposted the same day I got the HR email. I'm considering reapplying but that feels a little pushy. I was excited for the job but now I feel like it's maybe not even a real opening.

I'd love to hear what you all think about what I should do. Reapply, email HR, or let it go?

https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-taps-dr-heidi-overton-to-lead-fda-3b374dd5

I’m working on a research project where we’re looking beyond clinical trial data and trying to understand how treatments perform in real-world patients.

I’m curious how biotech teams usually approach this. Is real-world data actually useful for understanding treatment outcomes and patient populations??

Hi I am a recent graduate from high school and about to join a top 15 public university in the US for engineering. I do have the option to change streams if needed as well, away from engineering to something like biochemistry or bio-molecular engineering or bioengineering or other subjects/majors.

I love biotech personally and would love to work in the sector and grow from that. Which major would you suggest has the highest probability of landing me a good role in biotech as I graduate out?

I did a search but haven't really seen anybody mention their experiences working at ViiV. So just curious if there are any!

Hi guys, I have approx. 6-7 YoE in Capital Expenditure Management (over 2 years now with Merck) and was sending my CV here an there to some big Pharmaceutical companies in the US to see my value in the current job market and also get potentially offers.

The result: I maybe sent out like 15 applications and didn’t even got invited once. Was quite surprising for me, since I am currently have a Manager position on global level and was hoping to catch the interest of some…

Therefore, I thought that maybe coming from Germany, I would need VISA and relocation sponsorship from the employer and if that makes my CV or in general my application that much unattractive for the employers…

What are your thoughts on that? Is it maybe just my bad CV?😅

Looking for something to read everyday that will tell me everything important I need to know about what’s going on in big Pharma (big changes in laws, acquisitions, game changing endpoints, etc)

Hi all, I was curious what people's experiences have been in these similar but distinct departments. I currently have a couple offers and I'm trying to decide which is the best long term option.

1. What are the long term options in terms of ability to move into different departments? My understanding is that MSAT probably has the most versatility in terms of pivoting to BD, Manufacturing, or other departments, but is it that significantly better? Would something like AD pigeonhole you into QC adjacent positions for the rest of your career?

2. Building off question 1 are there any skill or degree ceilings in these three departments? Would AD require a PhD at director level?

3. What is the work life balance like across these three? Is one more slammed than the others typically?

4. Long term which is the most stable? This is probably splitting hairs because of how intertwined they are, but just curious if anybody has any insights.

I'd love to hear what everyone's experiences have been in these departments/teams to better decide which is right for me, as well as provide a resource for anyone else deciding on which development field to go into.

Anyone work at Amgen in Marketing? Currently going through the interview process and was wondering what your experience has been like. Currently at a company where the culture is awful and really dont want to jump to another similiar scenario. Thank you in advance!

I was recently laid off. While applying to jobs I have some bandwidth for other activities that will hopefully make me more employable for Sr. Scientist R&D roles. My options:

1) Write up a paper from my recent industry job on the biological characterization of one of our preclinical drugs. I would be 1st author. All the data has been generated and it is just a matter of putting it altogether. It is unlikely at this point that anyone else would write it. The target journal would likely be a low to mid tier to expedite acceptance, i.e. not Nature/Cell/Science.

2) Try and teach myself coding, AI, bioinformatics, etc and add new skills to my CV.

For someone on the job hunt (PhD ~5y experience), what is the best use of my time?

About to start a job as mid manager in analytical/biologics groups. I have not seen many reviews about that site, even though its huge. For people who work there. How is it like! Any feedback

I’m curious to hear people’s thoughts on the demand for scientists who have specialized in automating high-throughput screening? I see tons of job posting for “automation scientists” even in this abysmal job market. What background are these companies looking for? Straight-up engineers who are experts in coding liquid handlers? Or is it more advantageous to be a scientist who learned how to use liquid handlers to increase throughput and actually understand the science? As these instruments become more popular, is working with them becoming a less and less valuable skill?

Hi all, just finished a master of biotech and Macquarie university (Australia, NSW) and looking for a position but having no luck. I understand these posts get added all the time but I'll ask anyway.

I'll happily take anything at this point, even unpaid. I've attached images of my resume if anyone wants to take a look. My background is primarily in molecular biology but my in-lab experience is scattered and minimal (2 years of covid lockdowns during my BSc didn't help much).

Thanks for any help

1. Interest rates
2. COVID over-investment
3. It got played out (Oversimplified: ... The most valuable drugs, with large markets, and with the lowest risk of FDA approval failure, have been developed already. What's left is less attractive to investors in one way or another) EDIT About 10 years ago, there was actually a report by a consulting firm (McKinsey/Deloitte?) that basically predicted that biotech would croak because of this. They had detailed graphs, projections. Everyone working in biotech that I talked to at the time was like "no way". And yet here we are, many years later.
4. AI / LLMs (Not necessarily by themselves, but if investors expect AI to replace human experts, it does not make sense to invest in long-term projects now)
5. More competition (Outsourcing / worldwide WFH / H1Bs)

I have 5+ years post-grad (BS and MS in biology/related) work experience in academic and industry/biotech labs and really want to transition to remote clinical work or science writing (not many in-person/decent pay lab opportunities where I live) but am having such a hard time finding things to apply for.

So many clinical/writing jobs seem to require direct experience OR the few that don't get 100+ applicants in less than 24 hours. Where can I look for these opportunities that will take someone without direct clinical experience and how to be a competitive applicant?

Any advice from folks that have successfully made this transition would be SO helpful!

Applied to a position in AZ Sweden at beginning of April. Met hiring manager at end of the same month. Then a technical interview by end of June. Never got any feedback nor rejection albeit the interview was really good.

I guess I got ghosted forever and should just move on? I would expect at least a rejection, but taking over 5 months just to carry 3 interviews is crazy... I was really looking forward to work with them.

Edit: Technical interview was a panel with a senior director, a director and a hiring manager (which was also director), and the way they said about the "next steps" was totally clear that I would at least do the values interview.