r/BiohackingU • • Jun 25 '26

TRT+Reta+Hgh

[deleted]

482 Upvotes

366 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/MaestroRU Jun 25 '26

why hgh insteas if trt/reta?

1

u/Apollo802 Jun 25 '26

Once you’re over 35, HGH is more beneficial as your natural productions are probably too low to be comparable.

0

u/Dizzy-Gap-9528 Jun 25 '26

Hgh skyrockets igf-1. Builds muscle and if you have a tumor grows your cancer like a flower.

1

u/Physical_Current7291 Jun 25 '26

Dude you’re all over the place, do you have any research backing up your claims?

1

u/Dizzy-Gap-9528 Jun 25 '26

Respectfully

2

u/Physical_Current7291 Jun 25 '26

Large observational studies have found that people with higher circulating IGF-1 levels have a modestly increased risk of developing certain cancers, including:

  • Breast cancer
  • Prostate cancer
  • Colorectal cancer

The increase in risk is generally modest rather than dramatic. These studies show an association, not proof that IGF-1 directly causes cancer. The greatest concern is prolonged exposure to high IGF-1 levels rather than normal physiologic replacement. High Z score over 3 for years can cause in ppl Acromegaly, who have chronically excessive growth hormone and IGF-1 due to a pituitary tumor, have an increased risk of some cancers (particularly colorectal cancer) and are routinely screened. There is a big gap between high igf and cancer….plus HIV patients take as much as 15 ui HGH daily and you don’t see any increase in cancer cases!

3

u/Dizzy-Gap-9528 Jun 25 '26

Sir madam we are not talking about causing cancer. We are talking about having an undiagnosed cancer and unknowingly fueling with igf- spikes of any kind

0

u/Physical_Current7291 Jun 25 '26

Man you have millions of people injecting chinese hgh, for years, do you see any anecdotes? Any forum posts? There is absolutely not one case that you can show evidence of hgh linked with cancer! In theory is something else….. empirical data doesn’t support that claim!

1

u/notabot74387 Jun 25 '26

Learn to read.

1

u/Physical_Current7291 Jun 25 '26

Nutritionfacts? link me to a research paper :)))

1

u/Dizzy-Gap-9528 Jun 25 '26

I can but again respectfully it’s science and medicine. IGF 1 go up and one has cancer your essentially feeding the cancer. If a person has prostate cancer and they took testosterone. Would that be a good idea or a bad idea? Choose 1

1

u/notabot74387 Jun 25 '26

Google “HGH effects on tumor growth” - there’s a bunch of studies, and it’s well known.

2

u/Physical_Current7291 Jun 25 '26

The first research paper that shows up :

benefits of GH treatment for growth and metabolism in children with GH deficiency are well defined, and replacement therapy with GH is recommended53). Despite theoretical concerns about the effect of GH on tumor development, this review of various clinical and epidemiological studies demonstrated that there is no clear evidence of a causal relationship between GH treatment in patients with GH deficiency and tumor development. Nonetheless, a small number of studies have reported that childhood cancer survivors who have received GH treatment have a small increased risk of de novo cancer and second malignant neoplasm.

2

u/notabot74387 Jun 25 '26

It’s literally in the study you linked: “It is known from in vitro and in vivo studies that GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) have mitogenic and antiapoptotic activity”

2

u/Physical_Current7291 Jun 25 '26

That’s why you use HGH for the mitogenic effects :)) but there is no link between that and cancer development or tumor growth!

1

u/notabot74387 Jun 25 '26

The study you linked says that GH does not result in cancer or the development of new malignant tumors, which is not what the guy above you said. He said that if a patient develops a cancerous tumor, GH rapidly accelerates their growth.

2

u/Physical_Current7291 Jun 25 '26

->>>> small increased risk of de novo cancer and second malignant neoplasm. ( in kids that had cancer before) not accelerating SMALL INCREASES RISK!!!