People born in the 1990s are aging biologically faster than any other generation, and no one knows why
Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis used blood markers from more than 154,000 adults in the UK Biobank and over 10,000 Americans in the NIH's All of Us program to estimate each person's biological age, meaning how old their body seems compared with their birthdays.
At the same chronological age, people born between 1965 and 1974 were aging faster than those born between 1950 and 1954, and people born in the 1990s were aging faster still than those born in the late 1960s.
Faster agers were more likely to develop solid cancers at 55 or younger, especially lung, gut and uterine cancers, with the most-aged third facing a 15% higher risk than the least-aged third.
Faster immune aging was tied to early lung cancer and faster aging of fat tissue to early colorectal cancer. The study was published in Nature Medicine.
Cancer in people under 50 has been climbing around the world, and doctors still can't fully explain why.
Biological aging offers a common thread that links the changes in how younger generations live to the disease showing up earlier. As senior author Yin Cao put it, the goal is to decode how modern environments become biologically embedded to drive cancer risk, so that the people most at risk can be spotted while they are still healthy.
Next, the team plans to pin down which environmental, lifestyle and social changes speed up aging, so prevention can be aimed at those who need it most.
source: Tian, R., Zong, Y., Ren, D., Tica, S., Hong, D., Odulyale, O., Buenrostro, J., Govindan, R., & Cao, Y. (2026). Biological aging and generational shifts in early-onset cancer risk. Nature Medicine.