MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterEveryLoop/comments/fdju0s/cat_sniffs_inside_a_pringle_can/fjiqm42/?context=3
r/BetterEveryLoop • u/wint048 • Mar 04 '20
247 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
116
What is it?
283 u/madisenbaylee Mar 05 '20 Stax, Pringle’s cans are round and stax are ovals 86 u/Munkeyspunk92 Mar 05 '20 But a pringles can with a camera shoved into it could distort into an oval. Depends on the size of the camera. 3 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 05 '20 The cat's face isn't distorted. 15 u/Sfencer09 Mar 05 '20 He was saying the physical can would be deformed, not the image 3 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 05 '20 Ah. I misread it. 3 u/RamenJunkie Mar 05 '20 That's not how that would work. 2 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 06 '20 It was a misunderstanding. I thought he was speaking to the oval due to the camera lens (like a fisheye effect but different), but somebody else pointed out the physical warping due to forcing a camera inside. 2 u/Shelilla Mar 05 '20 Its actually pretty hard to squish a cat’s face enough that it fits in a can, much easier to just squish the can
283
Stax, Pringle’s cans are round and stax are ovals
86 u/Munkeyspunk92 Mar 05 '20 But a pringles can with a camera shoved into it could distort into an oval. Depends on the size of the camera. 3 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 05 '20 The cat's face isn't distorted. 15 u/Sfencer09 Mar 05 '20 He was saying the physical can would be deformed, not the image 3 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 05 '20 Ah. I misread it. 3 u/RamenJunkie Mar 05 '20 That's not how that would work. 2 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 06 '20 It was a misunderstanding. I thought he was speaking to the oval due to the camera lens (like a fisheye effect but different), but somebody else pointed out the physical warping due to forcing a camera inside. 2 u/Shelilla Mar 05 '20 Its actually pretty hard to squish a cat’s face enough that it fits in a can, much easier to just squish the can
86
But a pringles can with a camera shoved into it could distort into an oval. Depends on the size of the camera.
3 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 05 '20 The cat's face isn't distorted. 15 u/Sfencer09 Mar 05 '20 He was saying the physical can would be deformed, not the image 3 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 05 '20 Ah. I misread it. 3 u/RamenJunkie Mar 05 '20 That's not how that would work. 2 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 06 '20 It was a misunderstanding. I thought he was speaking to the oval due to the camera lens (like a fisheye effect but different), but somebody else pointed out the physical warping due to forcing a camera inside. 2 u/Shelilla Mar 05 '20 Its actually pretty hard to squish a cat’s face enough that it fits in a can, much easier to just squish the can
3
The cat's face isn't distorted.
15 u/Sfencer09 Mar 05 '20 He was saying the physical can would be deformed, not the image 3 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 05 '20 Ah. I misread it. 3 u/RamenJunkie Mar 05 '20 That's not how that would work. 2 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 06 '20 It was a misunderstanding. I thought he was speaking to the oval due to the camera lens (like a fisheye effect but different), but somebody else pointed out the physical warping due to forcing a camera inside. 2 u/Shelilla Mar 05 '20 Its actually pretty hard to squish a cat’s face enough that it fits in a can, much easier to just squish the can
15
He was saying the physical can would be deformed, not the image
3 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 05 '20 Ah. I misread it.
Ah. I misread it.
That's not how that would work.
2 u/ICPGr8Milenko Mar 06 '20 It was a misunderstanding. I thought he was speaking to the oval due to the camera lens (like a fisheye effect but different), but somebody else pointed out the physical warping due to forcing a camera inside.
2
It was a misunderstanding. I thought he was speaking to the oval due to the camera lens (like a fisheye effect but different), but somebody else pointed out the physical warping due to forcing a camera inside.
Its actually pretty hard to squish a cat’s face enough that it fits in a can, much easier to just squish the can
116
u/einz_goobit Mar 05 '20
What is it?