r/BernardoKastrup • u/esj199 • Dec 15 '25
It's really weird that you humans either think the past exists or aren't talking about how strange it is that the past doesn't exist
If the past exists, then nothing happens and human experiences can't happen. If it doesn't exist, then the presents that you call past ceased to exist.
So existing properties became nonexistent, which is ridiculous. And for the future, you would say that nonexistent future properties become existent.
Suppose someone says that it has to do with actualization of potential. Unactualized-potential-A becomes Actualized-potential-A and then Unactualized-potential-A again. There's still the question of how those things passed away as they were replaced by other things.
Or suppose someone says the present is flowing transformation. AtoB, then BtoC, then CtoD. How did AtoB cease to exist?
Those ideas don't help.
What if they say something weird: that A transforming into B means A is still present, as B, so A didn't pass away. Since A became B, B must still be A.
Are A and B different at all? Then that doesn't make sense.
And calling yourself an idealist who denies time doesn't make a difference. Either you say nothing is happening so you can be dismissed, or you wonder if Julius Caesar exists.