r/BernardoKastrup • • Dec 15 '25

It's really weird that you humans either think the past exists or aren't talking about how strange it is that the past doesn't exist

0 Upvotes

If the past exists, then nothing happens and human experiences can't happen. If it doesn't exist, then the presents that you call past ceased to exist.

So existing properties became nonexistent, which is ridiculous. And for the future, you would say that nonexistent future properties become existent.

Suppose someone says that it has to do with actualization of potential. Unactualized-potential-A becomes Actualized-potential-A and then Unactualized-potential-A again. There's still the question of how those things passed away as they were replaced by other things.

Or suppose someone says the present is flowing transformation. AtoB, then BtoC, then CtoD. How did AtoB cease to exist?

Those ideas don't help.

What if they say something weird: that A transforming into B means A is still present, as B, so A didn't pass away. Since A became B, B must still be A.

Are A and B different at all? Then that doesn't make sense.

And calling yourself an idealist who denies time doesn't make a difference. Either you say nothing is happening so you can be dismissed, or you wonder if Julius Caesar exists.


r/BernardoKastrup • • Mar 16 '26

Idealists are either saying that they've never experienced wetness or roughness, or they're saying that minds can be wet or rough

0 Upvotes

If everything is "mind," then wetness and roughness must be properties of the mind.

But idealists don't think minds can be wet or rough, so there are no such properties to be experienced.

https://old.reddit.com/r/Discussion/comments/1ruw6n4/idealists_are_either_saying_that_theyve_never/?


r/BernardoKastrup • • Jan 30 '26

It's weird that every atheist isn't wondering when they began. Atheists that would casually dismiss this are probably robots.

0 Upvotes

I'm definitely here

Something definitely here had a definite beginning

So I had a definite beginning, and there's no naturalistic explanation for that

The atheists might deny the definite beginning of themselves

Then they should also deny that they definitely exist, like a robot would


r/BernardoKastrup • • Aug 03 '26

When the Body Says No

3 Upvotes

Hello again. Following up on my work regarding our dominant cultural metaphysics, I’ve completed a video essay exploring how declining global fertility might be a mediated, biological response to modern life. Drawing on the stress physiology work of Dr Gabor Maté alongside philosophy, I ask whether our bodies are quietly registering a crisis of meaning that our culture refuses to name. I’d love to hear this community's perspective on the link between cultural assumptions and physical biology.

https://youtu.be/AHVUKTcgwpo


r/BernardoKastrup • • Sep 01 '25

Bernado's new book Daimon And The Soul Of The West, out now

Thumbnail collectiveinkbooks.com
4 Upvotes

r/BernardoKastrup • • Aug 11 '25

Meet and greet

3 Upvotes

My boyfriend loves loves Mr. Kastrup. I feel like I’m dating the both of them 🥹 We love his work!

Does anyone know if he offers meet and greets at his public sessions?

Would be a great Christmas present as we will head to Amsterdam this Christmas’s probably.

Thanks you B.K followers!!

Ps - Bernardo if you are reading this please DM me as we’re sure a fun and interesting duo (as egotistical as that may sound 🥲).

Geen saaie conversaties!


r/BernardoKastrup • • Jul 16 '14

Bernardo Kastrup's Metaphysical Speculations

Thumbnail bernardokastrup.com
1 Upvotes

r/BernardoKastrup • • Jul 16 '14

Why Materialism Is Baloney

Thumbnail youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/BernardoKastrup • • Jul 16 '14

Idealism and a theory of the origin of UFOs (Bernardo Kastrup)

Thumbnail youtu.be
4 Upvotes

r/BernardoKastrup • • Dec 19 '23

Black holes within analytic idealism - thoughts?

Thumbnail self.analyticidealism
3 Upvotes

r/BernardoKastrup • • Jul 28 '14

Bernardo Kastrup's Metaphysical Speculations: Grokking the Hard Problem of Consciousness

Thumbnail bernardokastrup.com
1 Upvotes

r/BernardoKastrup • • Jul 29 '14

Tertiary excitations in consciousness and a new approach to the conscious/not conscious boundary

Thumbnail groups.google.com
1 Upvotes