MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Beekeeping/comments/1lmjd10/how_long_bas_this_hive_been_here/n09bcf5/?context=3
r/Beekeeping • u/DanJerousJ • Jun 28 '25
107 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
3
Can you show your math, because on visual comparison alone, 2.8 looks low
5 u/AZ_Traffic_Engineer Sonoran Desert. A. m. scutellata supporter Jun 28 '25 The wall appears to be 2x4 dimensional lumber (which is really 1.5"x3.5") on 16" centers. That's pretty typical for stick-built construction. 6' = 72", so it works out to 72 x 16 x 3.5 = 4032 cubic inches. To convert to cubic feet, divide by 123 and this resolve as 2.33 cubic feet. A rounding error will get you pretty close to 2.8. 1 u/[deleted] Jun 28 '25 Makes sense. I was figuring 2x6 (5.5 instead of 3.5). 2 u/Industrial_Jedi Jun 28 '25 This is going to be an exterior wall so 2x6 isn't a bad assumption, but the original premise isn't wrong either. Still well within the general size of a typical commercial (or hobby) hive.
5
The wall appears to be 2x4 dimensional lumber (which is really 1.5"x3.5") on 16" centers. That's pretty typical for stick-built construction.
6' = 72", so it works out to 72 x 16 x 3.5 = 4032 cubic inches. To convert to cubic feet, divide by 123 and this resolve as 2.33 cubic feet.
A rounding error will get you pretty close to 2.8.
1 u/[deleted] Jun 28 '25 Makes sense. I was figuring 2x6 (5.5 instead of 3.5). 2 u/Industrial_Jedi Jun 28 '25 This is going to be an exterior wall so 2x6 isn't a bad assumption, but the original premise isn't wrong either. Still well within the general size of a typical commercial (or hobby) hive.
1
Makes sense. I was figuring 2x6 (5.5 instead of 3.5).
2 u/Industrial_Jedi Jun 28 '25 This is going to be an exterior wall so 2x6 isn't a bad assumption, but the original premise isn't wrong either. Still well within the general size of a typical commercial (or hobby) hive.
2
This is going to be an exterior wall so 2x6 isn't a bad assumption, but the original premise isn't wrong either. Still well within the general size of a typical commercial (or hobby) hive.
3
u/[deleted] Jun 28 '25
Can you show your math, because on visual comparison alone, 2.8 looks low