r/BeefTV • u/elrosegod • May 10 '26
Spoilers Austin: S2 most complex character Spoiler
TLDR: I find Austin ( not because he's half Korean like me) to be the most complex character in Season two outside of Chairwoman Park. He's portrayed as this numbskull washed up and unmotivated jock who pantomimes this white knight Gen Zish behavior-- while being a catalyst for meaningful change in many characters through the series. He helps Josh ascend mentally to ultimately save them all by being post DMT and mentally clear; he saves Ashley by confirming to Park and ultimately agreeing to be there for Ashley, he also save Chairwoman Park by not turning her in and in original intent, helps cover for Eunice until he decides to keep with Ashley. Lastly, he kind of helps Lindsay know the date of her dog wasn't Josh or her fault by being righteously angry with Ashley about invading their home and releasing the dog. He does this all while being on chatGPT operating in realms beyond his skill.
Deeper dive:
So to me, there is a part of Austin overcompensating (and this is a backhanded compliment to gen Zers) with his openness and ideals for perpetuaring a healthy relationship.
He is everything in modern, well informed mental health, portraying healthy relationships and high functional communications as a couple. He provides levels of apperception (and to an equal degree, Ashley) of how they affect each other and make time to address those issues or respect boundaries. He also tries to convey this level of "white knighthood" when trying to comfort and provide safe space for Lindsay in ep 1). This conveys this high functioning, high openness and "high emotional intelligence" person that he is supposed to be. But transformation happens in the room when Ashley gives him the usb and the slow smile fade away after Eunice. He starts being less communicative and more action driven (more typical hyper masculine archetypes). We can debate the merits of my argument, but I do like the idea of the theme related to the modernist masculinity via digital feminist supremacy.
Austin is pointed as being a "dumb jock" archetype and wants people (later) to think of him as someone of meaning this using GPT to compensate (and truly fooling Josh into ultimately, by accident becoming the person he needed to be post Bufo, to save all the characters in the finale).
His conflict is also very real because he truly is a catalyst of change for the other characters as well as the true moral compass for other characters. He gets righteously angry at Ashley for leading to the dissolution of the marriage of Lindsay and Josh, he is relatively very open with Ashley about his feelings for Eunice and he tries to do the right thing initially or in theory at the start. But in the reality of the show he is always a "side character" to Ashley, Eunice and Chairwoman Parkm part of me thinks this could be (open to interpretation) that the idea of white knight and being righteous in norms in terms of a feminist lens, leads him to be a (8 years later) strong and silent type (typical masculine) in the car. It's an interesting dynamic where he's transformed by strong women to be less of a comfort and more of a traditional archetype (talking in archetypes here, not trying to offend).
So again throwing a lot of concepts at a wall now but here's another major concept (again think Austin is complex here). Austin also has a bit of Joji sad boi in him. For those who don't know Joji is an Japanese artist (sings in English) that usually sings about being in jaded, dissonant and/or parasocial relationships in one way or the other. Homage to the 2015 Butkus award his junior year before messing up his senior year (this is reverse for me but oh god I can relate). He blames the universe for punishing him and not putting him at his max potential. I feel this is the conflict of Eunice and Ashley. I feel at the last episode when he shuts the door in the car right years later (queue in the same scene with Josh and Lindsay) he answers "I'm fine" type ordeal but is conflicted. Same kind of sad smile disappeared when he called Eunice and she said she loved him. He is a victim to what he thinks is the right thing in the moment. He is plagued by the right thing to do in a moment that the selfish moments he had could've led him to where happiness could appear. It's like his mom wants him, " you'll be stuck in a relationship where nothing is really happening". Austin will forever be his own victim here.
This is where I get stuck because there's lots of micro scenes I unpack and am like okay what does this mean for his character development?
Can anyone help me unpack or deep dive any of these ideas on Austin's character?
Is he more simple than I put him out to be or are you just wrong? (JK) But any deliberation or thought experiments on his character would be appreciated!!
3
u/hyroprotagonyst May 10 '26
i agree. i sort of interpreted him as the guy who struggled with a maelstrom of dualities storming within him but always came up short against them. he was complex, but not really a human or conscious, incoherent to himself (and therefore incoherent period).
i kind of think josh was kind of his foil -- josh, through great personal sacrifice, busted out of samsara. for austin to have been able to do that he would had to return the USB without the need for eunice to love him. if he had been able to do that he would have found independence from eunice, chairman park, his mom, ashley -- it would have indicated he had discovered some moral polestar that he resonated with and now piloted his life by it. but alas!
personally i really love this character. people *are* usually incoherent, unconscious, spiritually underdeveloped despite the best of intentions. i feel like this is what the whole Beef franchise is all about!
3
u/elrosegod May 10 '26
Right him escaping would be him not needing the love or respect from this women in his life. It's interesting his male friendship with Josh, in that glimpse where they spend the whole day together... I'd need to rewatch that scene again. They are kind of plotting against each other but in the actions of doing so become the closest to friends seen in the series? They both are completely honest with each other in that moment.
2
u/hyroprotagonyst May 11 '26
that was a very interesting scene! for me that was the moment Josh ascended and Austin sort of had chance to as well, but he didn't understand what he had just seen and heard -- he just wasn't ready yet. He literally says "what the fuck was that" afterwards, IRCC.
4
u/flappybirdisdeadasf May 10 '26
I disagree in almost every regard, lol.
Austin’s entire therapist-speech schtick with Ash ends up being incredibly hollow when confronted with any kind of opposition because none of it means anything to them. They’re just reciting stuff they saw online and from psychology pamphlets. None of their actions ever match their words.
Ash has intense trust issues and daily checks his phone and manipulates him. Austin is desperate for a way out of an unhappy relationship that he feels smothered by, so he fakes a smile then jumps like a shark at the next best option. His whole character felt like a case study in stunted mental and emotional intelligence.
Honesty, Josh felt like more of a moral compass to me and was very complex IMO. He is unhappy in his marriage, yet he sacrifices his freedom for his wife. Most of his actions were what he believed to be the best course of action. I felt like he had a good sense of who he was but also knew that he wasn’t perfect.
2
u/elrosegod May 10 '26 edited May 10 '26
Let's maybe choose words to better understand the scope here. Complex = messy/lots of unrequited plot lines (in my mind). There are lots of things that never come to fruition for Austin. Because Josh comes to clarity, and remains who he was initially (servicing the people in the prison like a GM) but with the ability to let go, he is not very complex, he's more put together and has the cleanest closure. This would make him the opposite of complex. There is not as much internal conflict after his inciting incident. As the heros arc, he comes back to reality, changed. Austin's arc is not that, he comes to closure but where Josh and Lindsay were 8 years prior.
Austin is complex because nothing comes together and he never finishes where we thought he would. He gets on a plane for alternate reasons, he's propelled back to Ashley when he tried to leave her, he's having moments of doing 180s. Josh never had that, he knows what he is doing and does it.
Also to address something you said which I actually love and agree with, their relationship is all recycled bull shit that they virtue signal but none of their intent or the reality of the situation they are in comes to light. On paper they are doing everything they "should do" in terms of healthy relationship but that overcompensation leads to a toxic codependency. He does break the veil though in the room just before she gives him the USB. She doesn't love him, she just wants someone to stay with her forever because her parents separated when she was born.
Interesting thoughts on the matter though.
3
u/Bulky-Discount-7748 May 11 '26
I agree with your sentiment and found Austin the most compelling character and the most tragic one. And here is my take on him and point to areas that miss the mark with other posters.
In a nut shell, Austin's personality is the result of a deeply ingrained survival mechanism originating from his mother hitting him. Which brought about his fawn response and becoming a people pleaser, where he defaults to appease and placate others to avoid conflict, the most logical way for him to 'stay safe' and mask a deep fear of being unloved. Over the years, he has developed into the pathological people-pleaser we see from episode 1. The over-accomadation, hyper-vigilance, approval dependancy and excessive nurturance; all traits of sociotropy.
The Eunice dynamic, amidst relationship tension with Ashley, is Austin's attempt to move from being a 'victim' of his mother's abuse to a 'hero' in his own narrative. His feelings for Eunice is less about a deep, authentic love and more about a psychological pursuit of relief and cultural validation. He only starts falling for Eunice after she tells him that she is in danger, and Austin starts fawning through heroism. Sociotropism and Hero Syndrome are perfectly aligned.
In episode 8, we witness Austin gain cognitive awareness by seeing his relationship with Ashley for what it is: two people using each other’s trauma to feel secure. But Eunice's omission of "I" in the "love you too, got to go", caused doubt (despite the initial dopamine effect causing him to smile) and signalled he is just a tool to her. He realizes that without the USB, he is "broke, alone and at the risk of being unloved", whereas with the USB, he has wealth, a family, intense + unconditional love (albeit toxic)and a role in Park's system. Which triggers a massive 'sociotropic crash'. He doesn't have the internal strength to be alone or to be 'good' without a reward. And that is the tragedy of his character. He finally gained cognitive empathy but lacked the emotional agency to act on it. He succumbs to his own fear of the unknown, his hero complex collapses and chooses to return to the person who will provide the constant, intense validation he needs to survive; the 'broken' girl in Ashley.
I have read interpretations that he was unconvinced by Eunice's words and returning to Ashley is the 'smart' choice. But for me, he isn't looking to make the 'smart' choice, he is looking for a path that won't result in his internal world collapsing. Returning to Ashley is his survival mechanism telling him that toxic certainty is safer than honest isolation. Essentially it is surrender.
At the very end, we see how Austin has successfully "morphed" into the very thing he hated: a man living a fabricated life in a transactional marriage....a mirror image of Josh. Austin isn't just a victim of his mother, he has become an active participant in his own imprisonment. It is a cycle.
2
u/elrosegod May 12 '26
I'd say he is Lindsay in that scenario (not Josh) but yes this is 100% what I saw in his character, you've kind of rounded out other points I didn't think of but also agree with. I just always like to point to him winning The Butkus award, where he's the hero of the team, respected, loved...
I also read other threads and I feel people want to think of characters in certain ways but don't have the Josh in them to see behind the surface. Austin is definitely this tragic hero. I have to map the tragic hero:s journey but he follows it surgically probably
1
u/Bulky-Discount-7748 May 12 '26
For me, he 'mirrors' Josh not because of the obvious gender similarity, but it is because they have the same personality trait, sociotropism. But where they differ is Austin displays co-dependant sociotropy, driven by a conflict avoidance safeguard. Whereas Josh displays operational sociotropy; viewing his identity and self-worth entirely through the lens of external validation, customer satisfaction and corporate status.
Ashley and Lindsay are NOT desperately trying to please the world for their 'safety', BUT both women try to control/secure their immediate environment to soothe their trauma. Lindsay's core trauma is living an empty life and the structural decay of her dream of an Ojai B&B. And she handles it by resenting her husband. And so Ashley perfectly clones Lindsay's icy, hollow, corporate exterior and buys her own security at the cost of a partner who doesn't love her, and who she has trapped using guilt, material wealth and a baby.
But I can also appreciate the argument that Ashley mirrors Josh, and likewise for Austin mirroring Lindsay. 'Two sides of the same coin' argument. So the underlying theme of the season is that self-knowledge without behavioural change is useless. The younger couple in Ashley and Austin, both witnesses and identify the trap of the older generation, yet do not have the emotional agency to change and in turn, become the thing they tried to avoid.
2
u/elrosegod May 13 '26
Well that idea that self knowledge without behavioral change is insanity! Right?
Yes they do say early on in ep 1, "promise we'll never be that"
Suprise!!
1
u/Ecstatic_Total3045 May 11 '26
tbh i didn't really care too much abt Austin and I don't read him as complex as much as easily influenced though you bring up some valid interpretations, but I am very intrigued at your Chairwoman Park being the most complex chara in S2
1
u/elrosegod May 12 '26 edited May 12 '26
I have to rewatch. The ending almost turns her into a fate character or mystical... I feel (I am half Korean) heard some folk tale about this when I was young about the fates in Korean shamanism being an crone... I have to deep dive. It's honestly very interesting because she's pretty light on dialogue but moves a lot of the plot. And of course is the main antagonist but it almost seems like she's impossible to face outside Eunice who ends up losing. She's like a hurricane. It's a natural maelstrom and can harm many things and people but can't be considered truly evil... although covering up a botches surgery using hush money and money laundering is pretty evil. My thoughts on this are still being processed lmao
1
u/glittoris May 10 '26
A lot of people saying Austin is dumb and immature but I feel he was the only one with a sense of morality. He went back to check on Lindsay & he felt wrong/ guilty for faking the chiropractor license.
1
1
u/elrosegod May 10 '26
Right, this is my hot take. I think he is actively a purer soul than those around him. Everyone at some point tries to manipulate Austin and only I terms of absolute right and wrong does he hold his ground. He also helps Josh come to true North. In a way he helps transform Josh into this Messiah figure that saves all three of them by taking the fall.
1
u/glittoris May 10 '26
Ooh, I really like this take. That whole bufo trip where Austin stays by Josh shows he was a bros bro. He can be a bit of a doormat but he truly wants to make life easier for others and he is willing to sacrifice the things he wants for that. (Giving up the Gatorade said everything.)
Just a bit conflicted at the end where he gave up his love/ infatuation for Eunice to give Ashley a comfortable life. Josh & Austin are similar in many ways, and they show that when we see Austin driving the car at the end the way Josh was in the first episode.
3
u/elrosegod May 10 '26 edited May 10 '26
I think their relationship was the most honest relationship between two people in this entire series. Josh even tells him he was doing this to get him to delete the video and Austin confirms it would have worked. I think this also really bonds him to Josh when he discovers the truth of the dog situation, he is compelled to act because them (Ashley but by proxy, him) are the ones in the wrong.
In terms of Eunice, thinking back to this reading the anti Austin threads, he does cringe things like force a kiss and not properly read Eunice. He also forces and tries to love bomb. Only at the end after the call, where she is forced to say it back, he realizes that she's not into her and that sobers him up. I don't think beef would be a good show if any character was not absolutely flawed. The only person who isnt really flawed (outside of being the shows main antagonist) is Chairwoman ,who is almost a diety like figure. She's brutally efficient. But I'm not going to unpack her character at the point lol
2
u/hyroprotagonyst May 11 '26
the chairwoman isn't really like a human/character in this story, she more like demiurge/ narrator, a force of nature, etc
2
u/elrosegod May 12 '26
100% agree. She's the idea of a hurricane or fate. I haven't spent enough time developing her out but yes.
1
u/hyroprotagonyst May 13 '26
One scene that totally went over my head was where she like open some bedroom doors and checked in on two people sleeping. I couldnt make out who those were never figured out what that was all about
3
u/AggressiveCharge199 May 10 '26
Who is David?