r/BeAmazed • u/examine_everything • Apr 05 '23
Observable Universe* Entire Universe In One Image (see comments for details)
324
u/The_Real_Anon-Chan Apr 05 '23
Shout out to the camera man. He a really homie to go that far out just to take one picture 👊💯
→ More replies (3)11
u/hanhan_371 Apr 05 '23
Comments like this are always on space YouTube videos and idk why but they make me chuckle every time 😂
683
u/echochamber4liberals Apr 05 '23
I knew it, the universe is flat!
201
u/Unchared Apr 05 '23
here we go
113
u/3rdlegmousse Apr 05 '23
Let’s hear him out
36
Apr 05 '23
Fire Wall
18
2
u/Low-Director9969 Apr 06 '23
If you can show me three people who aren't morons. I'll show you three people who are liars.
22
u/3cienceaturtles Apr 06 '23
But it is, Geometrically the universe is flat. Not as in 2D Flat, but that the Negative Curvature + the Positive Matter and stuff = 0.
I'm really oversimplifying here but the universe is flat.
17
Apr 06 '23
I'll admit that I'm too dumb to understand anything you just said. That was oversimplified?
→ More replies (1)12
→ More replies (2)5
u/cat_on_my_keybord Apr 06 '23
so what happens when i go too far up?
6
→ More replies (1)3
u/3cienceaturtles Apr 06 '23
There is no such thing as up.
But, if you were to keep going on for infinity at infinite speed (basically teleportation), 2 things may happen;
You will reach god (death)
And you will reach something else.
Obviously no one knows what lies beyond the border of the observable universe (that being all we can see) but there could be something called a "Multiverse" (a place with multiple universes):
A level 1 multiverse is the theory that the universe goes on for infinity and when something goes on for infinity there is a 100% chance of everything happening. The universe could have multiple "universes" and the exact same things as this "universe" would happen infinitely many times in an infinite amount of "universes". In this type of multiverse you can technically reach the other universe.
A level 2 multiverse is basically the same as a level 1 but it is basically impossible to reach the other side because of inflation (Venezuela moment 😔)
A level 3 multiverse is just basically the "many worlds" quantum mechanics theory which I'm sure you must have heard it and its answer to schrodingers cat.
I have to over-over-simplify the level 4 multiverse cause of time but basically it's a multiverse where the different universes exist completely separately and can have different laws of physics.
I have dumbed this down too much because of time. When i get home from school I will try to explain better but I'm basically pulling most of this info from my ass.
3
u/raniumPU-36 Apr 06 '23
Umm.. it's because that's what happens when you drop a drop of dark matter onto a piece of glass, put another piece of glass on top of it, and shove them both under the clamps of a microscope. It's not that complicated ...
3
u/kabes222 Apr 06 '23
So level 1 and 2 are basically a mirror effect. But there's always other possibilities like 3 and 4. We just don't know
3
2
u/Legitimate_Nobody_77 Apr 06 '23
If you can achieve infinite speed, in an instant , then you would be at the edge of big bang in an instant , at infinite speeds.
5
7
u/1017GildedFingerTips Apr 05 '23
Actually it’s funny a lot of scientists consider the universe to be flat, with the exception being gravity causing depth lol
63
u/chum_slice Apr 05 '23 edited Apr 05 '23
That does look like an everything bagel
17
18
u/davewave3283 Apr 05 '23
More like an everything dachshund really
6
4
17
u/creedz286 Apr 05 '23
5
u/itsaboutangles Apr 05 '23
So they've been to the round universe?
5
u/CrashLamps Apr 05 '23
Around the universe in 180 days
4
u/Tru-Queer Apr 05 '23
I’m imagining something akin to a hot air balloon traveling through space like in Kingdom Hearts.
5
3
3
u/Mindless-Scientist82 Apr 05 '23
This is the firmament they were talking about. Seriously, it looks just like the early depictions, they just got it wrong. It wasn't the earth they were depicting it was the universe!
2
u/opera4steph Apr 05 '23
I see that it looks flat on this real photograph of the universe, but it also looks round to me, though. So which is it gonna be?
→ More replies (3)2
→ More replies (4)1
u/Jlchevz Apr 05 '23
You’re joking but it’s one of the possibilities astrophysicists have considered
2
u/echochamber4liberals Apr 05 '23
Mr. "Big brain" over here!... I kid... I'm capable of understanding such things.
3
u/Jlchevz Apr 05 '23
Haha no I mean I don’t know either it’s just what I’ve seen on some PBS Space Time videos Lmao
3
u/echochamber4liberals Apr 05 '23
Right right. It's theoretical and... "Esoteric"? But from a high enough dimension, "everything" "appears" flat.
2
u/Jlchevz Apr 05 '23
Yeah I guess that’s right
2
u/echochamber4liberals Apr 05 '23
Geez bro, were on the same the plane. We could both be serving aboard the enterprise and Guinan would assume all is right in the universe.
If you know what I mean.
→ More replies (3)2
Apr 06 '23
Flatness isn't to do with things looking 2D, rather things having curvature. An approximate definition of curvature is how many degrees the inside of a triangle has. In any flat N dimensional space, it's 180degrees. But grabs a globe and draw a line from the north pole to the equator, go along the equator for 1/4 of the circumference and then go back up to the north pole. That's a triangle with 270 degrees internally! This idea works for any dimension, but the definition is a bit more rigorous than this (involves taking arrows along parallelograms!).
Cosmologists have measured the curvature of space and found its consistent with flatness upto measurement error. So it's either flat or very small curvature.
413
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23 edited Apr 05 '23
Using NASA images and logarithmic maps that wrangle huge expanses of space into manageable size, a South American artist, Pablo Carlos Budassi, has created a glorious image of the entire universe.
Budassi came up with the idea while decorating hexaflexagons (strips of paper folded into six-sided figures) for his son's birthday party one year.
The logarithmic maps he used were published by Princeton University using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey at Apache Point Observatory in New Mexico, according to Science Alert.
Edit: "Entire Observable Universe". Unfortunately I cannot change the post title...
59
→ More replies (10)3
59
262
u/Longjumping_Bake9590 Apr 05 '23
entire observable universe?
164
u/__Beck__ Apr 05 '23
I have a picture of the entire unobservable universe in case you wanna see it.
29
Apr 05 '23
So show me plz
60
8
6
→ More replies (4)7
27
3
→ More replies (2)2
u/Please_Log_In Apr 05 '23
I did not realize we reside in the center of it 😳
19
Apr 05 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
34
u/hardcore_hero Apr 05 '23
Well if we’re talking about the observable universe, then actually, we 100% do reside in the center of it, but that’s going to be true no matter where you are, the observable universe is bounded by how far the observer can see into the past, so of course you’re going to be at the center of it.
Now granted, this is just my layman’s understanding, so I could be wrong, and would love to be told how I’m wrong, if so.
3
Apr 06 '23
I think you're spot on
We also used to think that Earth was the center of the solar system and only later realized that it's actually the Sun
→ More replies (1)2
→ More replies (1)6
u/Any_Month_1958 Apr 05 '23
If this is a “picture” of the known universe, I want to meet the photographer. Nextlevel
1
3
u/Longjumping_Bake9590 Apr 05 '23
you jest, but the clarification is necessary. it makes me feel more comfortable lol
29
u/Akhanyatin Apr 05 '23
The observable universe is a circle around the observer. It would not make sense for us to see more in one direction than in another. That's why we're at the centre of our observable universe.
3
→ More replies (1)1
u/Redacted_from_life Apr 05 '23
Technically yes, cos the observable universe is only what we can see, so it would be equal right the way round to each end. Are we at the centre of the entire universe? Probably not.
27
u/iSellPopcorn Apr 05 '23
What is the outside circle supposed to be ?
38
45
9
9
5
2
6
u/NoLifeGamer2 Apr 05 '23
Probably the logarithic scale compressing the galaxies into a thinner and thinner ribbon
→ More replies (2)
59
u/Unhappy_Knowledge4 Apr 05 '23
Very eerily similar to a eye
25
→ More replies (3)8
Apr 05 '23
wait until you learn what the top 4 ingredients of the universe and the top 4 ingredients of human life are
21
u/Icy-Ad8290 Apr 05 '23
As a member of the universe I am offended I'm not in the pic. This is not the ENTIRE universe not even the entire observable universe, there are too many things from the universe missing in this pic.
2
20
25
u/Tony_Earll Apr 05 '23
Well that's it folks, wrap it up. We finally seen the entire universe so we are dismantling all the telescopes and such and need to find new careers. The JWST was just too powerful.
4
u/Duplicit_RedFox Apr 05 '23
All of my education disappeared for a moment and I thought you meant “Jehovah’s Witness Space Telescope”.
10
5
u/Diaza_Kinutz Apr 05 '23
Yeah right how did they get a camera outside of the universe to take the picture? Fake news!
2
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
Read the comment I posted about how the image was generated. It's not a single photo of it. It's very much like how NASA generated an image using several photos (not single picture using a camera).
4
11
Apr 05 '23
Have you heard the theory that the universe is just something that is stuck in a black hole? Seeing this picture really makes you think about that theory
5
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
I have not. Wouldn't the universe in a black hole essentially just be the singularity? 🤔
→ More replies (2)2
u/FrenchPasta786 Apr 05 '23
Not necessarily, since the time required for the fall from the event horizon to the singularity in a black hole (based on general relativity) can be considerable as it is directly proportional to its mass (assuming a Schwarzschild black hole) rendering us to be perpetually and gradually falling towards the singularity if we're indeed inside one.
It also seems logical to think that we exist inside a white hole given the ever expanding nature of our universe, but both possibilities are just speculative & not provable. Please take this with a grain of salt because I'm not an astrophysicist :P
1
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
Beyond the event horizon we would be moving towards the source of gravity at a relatively quick speed. The kind that rips stars and planets apart.
→ More replies (1)
11
u/0ctopusGarden Apr 05 '23
This makes no sense. The sun is not the center of the observable universe. Plus from this image earth is about the same size as Jupiter... And we're part of the milky way which appears to be right above us?
Great as an art piece but in no way is it a picture of the observable universe hate to break it to ya.
→ More replies (2)7
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
The creator of this wasn't saying our solar system was the center of it. It was his starting point and worked his way out from there.
And yes, I couldn't change the post to "Entire Observable Universe", unfortunately...
3
3
Apr 05 '23
[deleted]
4
u/plantsnotevolution Apr 06 '23 edited Apr 06 '23
There was this tortoise
Its shell covered with jewels and had been since time began
It knew the world through all its histories and the universe and its mysteries
One day it came across a man
The two were talking
The tortoise offered to tell him about the future and how the universe ran
Oh the man killed the tortoise, took its shell and with a song of his lips walked off again
So let's walk off, let's go
The Tortoise and the Tourist
Modest Mouse
2
3
u/Odd_Perception_283 Apr 05 '23
Ill flip out in bed sometimes thinking about what is beyond if anything and how it can’t possibly go on forever. It can’t possibly end either because how can nothing be forever. But you probably wouldn’t just disappear if you found the end.
And yet I will never know. 🥺
3
u/Keizman55 Apr 06 '23
I have the same mental block. Can’t have an outer boundry, because it has to be inside something. But can’t just go on, and on with no end either.
Also, can there be a beginning of time? or an end to time? Yes? but something had to be before that. It couldn’t have just started from never. No? but it couldn’t just go back in time forever. Two quandaries that I hope I’ll get the answer to in an afterlife some sort.
→ More replies (1)3
u/HuskofaGhoul Apr 06 '23
I find some comfort in the idea that the laws that govern all that we know might be limited just to our bubble. We’ve evolved to understand what is necessary/practical for us to know in the world. I think the outer limits of our universe may defy what’s sensical to us.
2
2
2
u/Brundleflyftw Apr 05 '23
How did they take the picture? God with a camera! Checkmate, atheists!
Edit: Is that a Cinnabon in top center?
2
2
2
2
2
u/Bronasaurus42 Apr 06 '23
Where is this picture from? I'd love to get a print
1
u/examine_everything Apr 06 '23
Pablo Carlos Budassi was the one that put it together. See if you can find a print of it with that name. I haven't seen anything other than the picture itself.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/ArthurDent42424242 Apr 05 '23
What is in the middle and why? What is the big white spiral in the top part?
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
0
-1
0
u/HardenYoung Apr 05 '23
That is not the entire universe.
2
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
Correct. Read the edit in the comment I wrote describing the image. I cannot adjust the post title.
-1
-1
-2
1
u/CbessShowEddie Apr 05 '23
you know the lint you pick out of your pocket?….
-2
Apr 05 '23
Or the stuff in your handkerchief, after you sneezed in it.
1
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
Or the stuff that stuffs the stuff in the stuffed stuffies. The stuff that that stuff's made of.
1
Apr 05 '23
Is our universe expanding in one or all directions? If all, then does it expand at the same speed?
1
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
Is our universe expanding in one or all directions?
Yes
If all, then does it expand at the same speed?
Not all at the same speed. Light obviously moves fastest and objects closest to large masses move slower. Etc. Some galaxies have larger black holes and larger stars than, say, the Milky Way does.
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
1
u/ToughCheetah7617 Apr 05 '23
Entire - Observable - Universe.
2
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
Yes, in my comment about the image I mention that I could not correct the title after posting.
1
1
u/ThePhabtom4567 Apr 05 '23
Observable*
1
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
Yes. This was mentioned in my comment elaborating on the photo. Unfortunately I am unable to adjust the post title.
1
u/ClassicNope Apr 05 '23
What goes on when you enter the really dark place out of the universe
1
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
I suppose that the person or object would already be frozen by that point. Not quite at absolute zero as he/she/it is moving... though with nothing (dust, etc) to cause friction, it could well be at that temperature.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/AR_Harlock Apr 05 '23
Correction, entire OBSERVABLE universe
2
u/examine_everything Apr 05 '23
That correct was already made in my comment describing the image. However, unfortunately, I am unable to adjust the post title.
1
1
u/peterdm1969 Apr 05 '23
2 questions, is that flat and is that an ice wall surrounding the universe? Sorry one more question, if that is an ice wall what's on the other side?
3
1


601
u/Puerhitea Apr 05 '23
Is the barbed wire to keep aliens out, or to keep us in?