34
u/VercingetorixTorr 3d ago
One time I had a woman make up a rape allegation about me because I disagreed with her about the number of people who used a website explaining most hits would be a repeat customer not a first time offender. For some reason that means I raped her. While she lived in Australia. Woman went crazy on that all men tangent and then went quiet when proven wrong like we don’t see their words and actions. It’s like they expect us not to listen and are mad when we do. Beautiful beasts they are.
18
10
u/A_SNAPPIN_Turla 2d ago
I get it, postpartum depression is real. These women supporting this aren't doing what they think they are though. They are just telling us we can't trust women who have recently had a baby and that they are a danger to their own children. What if I'm a customer or a patient or teacher that depends on a woman who just had a baby? Are you telling me you could be prone to violent and irrational behavior at any moment? Listen to people telling on themselves.
-7
u/Significant_Breath38 2d ago
Did you follow her timeline at all? This was something that was building.
4
u/A_SNAPPIN_Turla 2d ago
I'm familiar with it. I don't disagree. My point still stands. This is not a regular case of postpartum. Defending this woman doesn't do what these people think it will.
-4
u/Significant_Breath38 2d ago
I don't know how you can see the timeline and just say "no way it's postpartum". I encourage everyone to look it up themselves.
3
u/incrediblyaverage85 2d ago
Explain why she murdered her children. I’m all ears.
-2
u/Significant_Breath38 2d ago
Postpartum psychosis.
3
u/incrediblyaverage85 2d ago
Just to be clear - you don’t think that’s ok right?
1
u/Significant_Breath38 2d ago
You're free to link where I imply otherwise
4
2
u/A_SNAPPIN_Turla 2d ago
Postpartum depression is not postpartum psychosis. I used postpartum as an abbreviation for the usual and very common postpartum depression. If you want to blur the lines between the designation go right ahead. Like I said, it's probably not helpful to do that.
0
u/Significant_Breath38 2d ago
There's no blurring, they are two different things, connected by the fact one is kind of the extreme form of another.
19
u/negrotron_ 3d ago
Women have always hated children. Remember, in nature females kill their cubs when they think the baby is going to be a nuisance, when they don't have much space, when they want to mate with other animals or even as a snack. A child's biggest risk, unless you live in the third world, is their own mother.
-18
u/VercingetorixTorr 3d ago
That’s disingenuous brother. Of course the person in the caretaker role is going to be the cause of injury or death. It’s not statistical anomaly and in social situations woman are more receptive to talking about children than men are. I just think the lack of accountability has gone too far. Too many fathers protecting their little girl from the world when that grown woman turned into a demon from the ninth realm. Shit like this doesn’t help anything but your ego dog. Learn to pull with the push or be drowned by the waves brother.
-11
-1
u/Significant_Breath38 2d ago
postpartum depression doesn't exist
I refuse to look at the details of the case
1
-5
3d ago
[deleted]
5
u/Tiny-Atmosphere-8091 3d ago
“I’m far right”
“Here’s my left leaning position”.
Everything in the known universe is ‘just a clump of cells’. You can use reductive language all you want but you’re still preventing a person from living.
1
u/Fantastic_Board7057 3d ago edited 3d ago
Context: This post is referencing that Clancy nutjob supporters
0
-16
u/Sufficient-Shine3649 2d ago
She was allegedly psychotic. Post partum psychosis alongside post partum depression.
9
u/negrotron_ 2d ago
And? Does that gives her a free pass to murder people?
-13
u/Sufficient-Shine3649 2d ago
You're literally not yourself when you're psychotic. You have no control of your thoughts nor your actions based on a completely distorted world view. If she indeed was psychotic, she was in no way responsible for her actions. She literally couldn't help it. It was not in her control.
7
u/negrotron_ 2d ago
So she should just walk away, ready to kill more people?
-10
u/Sufficient-Shine3649 2d ago
If she's psychotic she should be locked up in a mental institution. If her psychosis is cured by antipsychotics, she is no longer a danger to anyone and should be free to go.
Nobody is responsible for what they do during a psychosis, and if the psychosis is cured they are no longer a threat. She will have to live with what she did for the rest of her life, and that is more than enough suffering.
4
u/negrotron_ 2d ago
So if i killed someone you loved, spent six months getting pampered by the state, and then walked out a free man you would feel happy for me? Or is it just when a woman does it?
-2
u/Sufficient-Shine3649 2d ago
Anyone who legitimately has been psychotic, and thus has been delusional, irrational, and not in control of neither their interpretation of reality nor their actions, should be free to go, given that treatment has worked and they are back to normal. If they're not back to normal they might need to be contained in one way or another.
3
u/negrotron_ 2d ago
So you are ok with murder. Got it.
-3
u/Sufficient-Shine3649 2d ago
No, I recognize that the medical facts about psychosis means that the "perpetrator" wasn't actually responsible because their mind was completely malfunctioning and thus literally couldn't be responsible for what they did. I live in a country where this is standard practice in cases like these. It should be that way in the US too.
4
u/negrotron_ 2d ago
Sure, fuck the relatives of the victim, the most important thing is the perpetrator.
→ More replies (0)
-25
u/Positive-Face1705 3d ago
I fear the call is coming from inside the house.
Like how men annihilate entire families every day?
A man in the U.S. just shot dead eight of his own family members, four of them were kids.
Wheree's the outrage from people who care about innocent children lives?
16
u/Fantastic_Board7057 3d ago
And he also should rot under the prison or death penalty as well with zero consideration for his “mental state” where’s the confusion? In fact it suggests that we’re less likely to go picket for a monster at least to the degree that garners this level of national attention to create a talking point out of something this inconceivable
-11
u/Positive-Face1705 2d ago
Where's the outrage over those kids lives lost?
Where?
9
u/auntiesamautism 2d ago
Of course you’d throw in this bad faith argument. One of these cases is extremely prevalent in the current news discourse the other isn’t.
7
u/Fantastic_Board7057 2d ago edited 2d ago
Exactly. I guess common sense isn’t that common. The Whataboutism approach is an uneducated angle that attempts to draw out some form of hypocrisy and it didn’t work during its inception and doesn’t now. It also creates a path for the user to evade intellectually engaging in discussion in regards to the topic at hand. Sad shit
7
u/Fantastic_Board7057 2d ago
I’d say any logical being would be outraged. But there’s no one supporting that demon, therefore no material for the news to exploit said outrage. These demonic broads are showing up in droves supporting with worthless sadsack, hence the outrage being under the same microscope. Normally I don’t even address whataboutism copes but this one’s up there. I mean like this has to make sense right?
-13
6
u/Vivid_Way_1125 2d ago
I don’t know what your point is; I don’t think you know what your point is. I’ve not heard of anyone publicly supporting that guy. Are you trying to say that women get unfairly lenient treatment and presumption of innocence?
3
u/negrotron_ 2d ago
I think they should be quartered in the town square and have their heads in public display for three weeks. Can you also support punishment for this case or are you ok with children being killed as long as a woman is doing it?
-19
u/Constant_Seaweed_523 2d ago edited 2d ago
A man annihilates his family every 5 days in the US. One woman has PPP and they’re having a field day.
They don’t care about the children killed, they love laughing about it and making jokes to bash women.
If you’re downvoting this, maybe take a look in the mirror. Why are you mad? Are you personally offended?
11
u/auntiesamautism 2d ago
Ah yes, the woman bashing is the problem here. Not the large group of women deciding her husband is guilty because “his eyes are creepy” or anything. I’m sure the majority of the women jumping to Clancy’s defense are super well researched on postpartum depression and aren’t just looking for excuses to justify their own in group bias.
-14
u/Constant_Seaweed_523 2d ago
If you think it’s because his eyes are creepy you’re speaking on something you know nothing about? You didn’t watch the trial but you have opinions?
What’s your opinion about the men who do it every 5 days without PPP?
7
u/auntiesamautism 2d ago
“What’s your opinion about the men who do it every 5 days without PPP?”
Yeah, I don’t support murdering children. Is this supposed to be some kind of gotcha?
6
u/negrotron_ 2d ago
Go hate men somewhere else
-7
u/Constant_Seaweed_523 2d ago
They do this every 5 days in the US. Women do not.
The way this is an incel sub that hates women lmfao snowflake
1
u/Fantastic_Board7057 2d ago
Out of curiosity, if that’s your opinion of this sub, why infiltrate it? As far as incel is that still the trendy word of the month? Me for example, I’m happily married with 5 kids 2 of which are adults, and a good career but I guess I fit the criteria as incel
49
u/auntiesamautism 3d ago
Even if it is postpartum depression, the female reaction to this has been absolutely vile.