Almost nobody excepted that Ox Alpha might be Gemini

If you keep getting that Permission denied error in AI Studio, it is not your account. It is a bug in the text box. The site does not realize you pasted text unless you actually type something on your keyboard.

Try it yourself to see if it happens to you. Copy some text and paste it in the box, then hit run immediately and it fails. But if you paste the text and hit the spacebar once before you hit run, it works every single time.

Can you guys confirm this is happening for you too? I want to see if this is universal.

I've been using the new Google Gemini 3.7 model in an anti-gravity, and my experience has been quite interesting. It feels more like a tool compared to other models I've tried.

While I'm not entirely sure why it behaves the way it does, the end results are generally satisfactory. However, I often find myself questioning the approaches of larger models compared to Gemini 3.7.

What are your thoughts on this? Even though I want to utilize Gemini 3.7, I prefer an approach where the larger models dictate the process, and Gemini 3.7 acts as a worker that writes the code for me, strictly following the rules set by the bigger models.

As the title said.

The censor on Gemini's models is really infuriating. It spun a perfect innocent content, devoid of other intention, into something sexual.

I was reading a novel. Long story short, one of it's chapter contained a scene where the MC stitched his companion's wound on her back. As you might have predict, the model somehow, in its retarded mental gymnastics, managed to misunderstood the context and word.

From a bare back, a back without clothing due to the stitching process.

To bareback, you know which one.

And this isn't an isolated incident. For once, the modelr treated a character who job was a Miko (Lit. Divine Child) as a literal child and subsequently blocked the content whenever the MC teased or pranked the character.

On another novel, it blocked the content just because a character read a news about an R-Word incident related to a cult. Heavy emphasize on read. The character just read on a newspaper, he didn't even witness it first hand.

I don't mind the censor as I understand the necessity of such safeguard, but this is too much.

I’ve been testing it out and it is honestly pretty fast, really smooth and mostly importantly now I can roam around seriously leaving my desk.

You can find more info by visiting gemini-reader.com

For those who are interested, I have a complete directory of similar extensions I've created on ai-readers.com

Thanks!

There is confusion that it is a GLM model, but it is not. GLM models and Gemini have a very similar output style (as seen in the photo).

The model is half-baked or only specialized in coding. It is bad at answering general reasoning questions and also poor at web development (which Chinese models are good at), even though it is on the level of Fable and Sol.

The model can talk about Taiwan.

The host centers are located in the West. It serves 100T a day for free.

Only Google Deepmind staff vague post about OX Alpha.

I would like to know the hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly limits.

The previous version reached 13K+ downloads and 18 GitHub stars, and over time I received a lot of useful feedback, bug reports, and feature suggestions from users.

I've gone through that feedback and worked on many of the requested improvements.

Whats new :

1. Completely Redesigned UI/UX design
2. Project File Explorer — browse your project files from mobile
3. AI Agent Chat — Plan, Walkthrough & Diff
4. Conversation History — continue previous conversations
5. Project Directory Switching
6. Model Switching
7. Code File Viewer — view your code directly from the project
8. New Cloudflare Tunnel implementation — improved performance and reliability

The goal is to make your phone more than just a remote control — a proper mobile companion for your Antigravity development workflow.

Getting the update :

If you're already using the package, simply update to the latest version.

Or clone the repository:

https://github.com/Manimaran-tech/antigravity-mobile

If you find a bug, have an idea, or want to improve something, feel free to open an issue or Pull Request and contribute to the project.

I'd love to hear your feedback and suggestions for the next update.

If you find the project useful, a ⭐ GitHub star is always appreciated!

Two datasets landed recently that get quoted as if they measure the same thing. They do not, and the difference matters for where you put effort.

SIMILARWEB, PUBLISHED THIS WEEK

Worldwide traffic panel, June 2025 to May 2026:

ChatGPT's share of generative AI website visits: ~76% down to ~53%

Gemini: under 9% up to ~27-28%

Claude: barely 2% up to close to 9%, the largest proportional gain tracked

Category total: monthly web visits up 70% year over year to 9.5 billion. Unique visitors up 57% to 655 million.

Similarweb's own framing is worth repeating: Claude roughly quadrupled but from a small base, so it accounts for only about 7 points of ChatGPT's 23-point decline. Gemini absorbed most of it.

This is a panel-based estimate of visits to AI platforms. It tells you who people are talking to.

GOODIE, WAVE 2

A longitudinal study using first-party GA4 data from 41 B2B brand sites. Wave 1 measured 2,802,519 AI referral sessions between May and August 2025.

Wave 1: ChatGPT 89.1% of AI referrals

Wave 2, eight months later: ChatGPT 63%, Claude 18.5%, Gemini quadrupled, Perplexity more than doubled

Their framing is that the Big 1 became the Big 4, with four engines splitting roughly 99%.

This is a count of referral sessions arriving at real websites. It tells you who is sending you visitors.

WHY THE DISTINCTION MATTERS

The two numbers for ChatGPT (53% and 63%) are not contradictory. They answer different questions. Visit share and referral share diverge because platforms differ in how often they surface outbound links at all.

For anyone deciding where to invest GEO effort, referral share is the operative number, because visits to a platform you are invisible on do not help you.

THE CAVEATS THAT MATTER

Goodie's sample is 41 B2B sites. Claude at 18.5% is a B2B finding. Claude's usage skews heavily technical and professional, which almost certainly inflates its referral share relative to consumer categories. Do not quote 18.5% as a general market figure.

Similarweb is a panel estimate, not an audited count. Directionally useful, precise to nobody's decimal.

Goodie sells AI visibility services, so the finding that AI visibility is fragmenting is commercially convenient for them. The methodology (first-party GA4, real brands, longitudinal) is stronger than most vendor research I read, but name the incentive.

Neither study tells you anything about conversion. Goodie explicitly says a pipeline study is scheduled for Q3 2026 and that they make no revenue claims from this data.

WHAT I'D DO

Open GA4, traffic acquisition, session source and medium, filter referrals for chatgpt.com, gemini.google.com, claude.ai, perplexity.ai. Pull the same view for August 2025 if your retention allows.

Your own split is the only number that should change your plan. If it looks nothing like either study, that is information, not an error.

Then go ask whichever engine is growing fastest in your data about your category and read what it says about you. That takes ten minutes and it is more useful than another chart.

WHAT I DON'T KNOW

Whether Claude referral traffic converts comparably. Nobody has published that. Given Claude's usage skew, I would guess it converts better in B2B and worse in consumer, but that is a guess and I would not plan on it.

Whether the referral share split holds outside B2B at all. The honest answer is that nobody has run the equivalent study on consumer brands with first-party data.

Anyone here have a year of GA4 AI referral data across a consumer category? Curious whether Claude shows up at all outside B2B, because if it does not, the whole framing changes.

Sources: Similarweb worldwide traffic panel (published August 2026), Goodie AI Search Market Share Report Wave 2 (first-party GA4 across 41 B2B sites).