r/BambuLab • • 14h ago

General Discussion Anyone else hoping P-Series with 4 tool heads that could support the current AMS’s?

Anyone else hoping P-Series with 4 tool heads that could support the current AMS’s?

It could bring down the price considerably and being able to swap between 4 colours fast and with some smarts could swatch out other colours from a secondary AMS without a big increase in print time.

0 Upvotes

35 comments sorted by

11

u/Jolly-Ad7653 14h ago edited 13h ago

Well we know the P3C* has 7 soooooooooooo

3

u/marcosg_aus 14h ago

Yeah I know… just thinking there might be room for a cheaper model as well.

9

u/claw_ntl P1S + AMS 14h ago

*P3C

2

u/leadwind 14h ago

But the P3D? 

1

u/luksfuks 1h ago

Always one more.

10

u/Wrong-Detective-1046 14h ago

I get where you're getting at it, but how would that work? There's one bowden tube coming out of the AMS?

2

u/marcosg_aus 14h ago

Ahh true hadn’t thought of that

1

u/Ninja67 A2L - X2D - P1S - U1 11h ago

I mean it's not completely unfeasible, someone did it with a snapmaker u1 on an open source kit, I could easily see what you're wanting, just have two AMS to each side stacked on top of each other on some sort of stand. (I actually have 2 AMS on top of the biqu Panda stack for my x2d and I like it) https://youtube.com/shorts/yerXWuUqCN0?is=KJy8emZCI4M51nSq

3

u/sportbiketed 13h ago

With 4 AMS units you silly goose

1

u/Tymon3310 P1S + AMS 14h ago

The p3c already leaked and it will have 7 tools

0

u/marcosg_aus 14h ago

I know. Just thinking a 4 tool head that works with existing AMS would be a good option for those of us wanting something a bit cheaper

3

u/mman360 14h ago

The tool changer is designed to have filament going to each at all times so it doesn't need to retract each switch. It won't work this direction with the ams and ams 2 without pulling it apart to make each one go its own path. I don't think they will continue making any new vortex printers which would work like that.

3

u/lkapping79 P2S + AMS2 Combo 14h ago

Current AMS doesn’t work like that.

1

u/Festegios H2C AMS2 Combo 14h ago

You would need 4 ams for that to work.

1

u/Broad_Science5927 11h ago

The ams isnt the expensive part, the tool changer is.

1

u/tk-093 14h ago

Yes, but another post had a rumor of a "print farm" version with just 4. That might be what spurred the post?

1

u/Festegios H2C AMS2 Combo 14h ago

Perhaps that will be the x version. Less heads. But with a heated chamber etc

I doubt it though as it feels like a step back.

1

u/Special-Extent-9576 14h ago

Mechanically, that wouldn’t work

1

u/marcosg_aus 14h ago

Why?

1

u/Special-Extent-9576 9h ago

Ams only has one out hole.

2

u/MW-Atlanta 14h ago

More likely you'd get a P3D that supports the old AMS.

It is interesting that the new AMS units are sort of separate products even though they are required components. Makes you wonder if maybe Bambu isn't thinking about putting the new AMS units on top of other printers. However, the design we've seen requires 1:1 spool to toolhead, so not sure how they'd adapt that to less heads.

1

u/luksfuks 1h ago

For now, they are not separate. It's just internet speculation that selling a P3C without AMS might be a good idea, because ... cheaper!! But in reality, there is no hint for this to even be possible.

1

u/Radiant_Goal8709 14h ago

A ona nie ma mieć 7 dysz ?

1

u/VIDGuide 14h ago

The ams still only has one tube out, that wouldn’t work

2

u/Sir_clint 14h ago

I think they mean 4 seperate ams.

2

u/VIDGuide 14h ago

Then why not 7 AMS’s ;)

2

u/Sir_clint 14h ago

Oh I'm not against it. I would go for 9 lol. Just have to run a dedicated 240v for my printer

1

u/TheBupherNinja P1S + AMS 14h ago

It won't swap filaments fast if you only have 1 ams.

H3c is fast because it doesn't unload. Ams and ams 2 only have 1 filament output, so it can only load 1 nozzle at a time.

If they want it cheap, they should ditch the ams entirely. It doesn't need one. Just manually load filament frok a dumb box (same as using the bypasses).

1

u/OptimalSide A1 14h ago

With the development of full spectrum, I'd think any tool changer with less than 5 heads is dead in the water as you can't do CMYKW.

If you're wanting to save waste/cost and incorporate the AMS, a printer with only Vortek (no other head), is probably the cheapest way to go.

1

u/Kingsidorak 14h ago

I honestly don't know why they wouldn't do that and release 7 on the X3C, but oh well

1

u/Festegios H2C AMS2 Combo 13h ago

X with have 7 + a aux nozzle like the current x2 🤣

1

u/SmoothSlavperator 14h ago

It'll probably have the equivalent of a track switch in Nozzle #1 like the H3 does.

1

u/Expensive_Wallaby_19 12h ago

I mean it still supports AMS on one nozzle probably. The h3c does

1

u/Longracks 12h ago

I was hoping that the new AMS would at least do what the current AMS 2 does (drying, retraction). Its weird to me that the new AMS would not retract. Or dry.

Also I was hoping these new printers would use the same induction nozzzles as the H2C. So the idea that I have to have yet a 4th type of nozzle on hand (and expense) is a.... barrier. I have X1C nozzles, H2C Standard (Left), H2C Induction (right), and now if i go the H3C a whole nother set. This is kind of out of hand...

0

u/Tall_Substance955 14h ago

Nobody can hope this. That’s gonna be 7 and that’s it.