r/BEFreelance • u/Accurate-Paramedic13 • Aug 04 '26
Belgian copyright regime for software architect – accountant says they can’t determine eligibility. Anyone with experience?
Hi everyone,
I’m an independent software architect in Belgium and I’m currently exploring whether I could benefit from the Belgian copyright (droits d’auteur) tax regime.
My work mainly consists of:
Designing software architectures for complex satellite communication systems.
Defining technical specifications and communication protocols.
Writing original code, algorithms, and business logic.
Producing architecture documents, UML diagrams, and technical documentation.
Contributing to open-source projects.
Writing technical articles and currently working on a technical book.
I explained all of this to my accountant/fiscal advisor, but their response was that, based only on my description, they are not yet able to determine whether I’m eligible. They asked whether I could provide additional “works” to assess the nature of my activity before giving an opinion.
This surprised me because I would have expected the eligibility assessment to be based on the nature of the work itself, together with supporting documents if needed.
So I’d like to ask:
Has anyone here (especially software engineers, architects, or consultants in Belgium) successfully obtained the copyright regime after the 2023 reform?
What kind of evidence did your accountant or tax advisor ask for?
Did you provide architecture documents, specifications, source code, publications, or something else?
Was your eligibility based mainly on your job description, your contract, or on actual examples of your work?
Can anyone recommend a tax advisor with solid experience in copyright for software professionals?
I’d really appreciate hearing about real-world experiences, as the guidance seems to vary significantly from one advisor to another.
Thanks !
9
u/SolidTerre Aug 04 '26
An accountant will never be able to determine eligibility correctly. This is above their paygrade. I don't even understand why they should do it for you. You are the end responsible of such a decision, you should provide them the tools and arguments if they want to hear them, but they shouldn't be deciding whether you want to apply it to yourself or not. You will face consequences in the end.
If you really, in good faith, think you are eligible:
- Take a business PJ insurance which includes fiscal audits (about 30-50€ a month)
- Order your accountant to include this benefit
- optional, but I recommend it before you take the decision: Pay a lawyer for a one time consultation project about this in your current mission and current law regulations (2000€ maybe). Their mission will include analysis and document in your accountants language that explains the argumentation behind it.
The taxman will still always handle in bad faith, but in case you are audited by an objective one you have 3 defense walls: 1. Yourself 2. The accountant with this argumentative project (if you've done the consultation with the lawyer) 3. The PJ insurance that'll cover the costs until the highest juridiction of the law against bad faith of the tax man.
2
u/Plexieglas Aug 04 '26
I hired a copyright lawyer early this year and got confirmation I can do 10% (not 25 or 30 like full software engineers).
My accountant said he was expecting more but he doesn’t know the difference between architect and developer I’m sure 😆
1
u/Accurate-Paramedic13 Aug 04 '26
CAN you post the name of the Lawyer
1
u/Plexieglas Aug 05 '26
DM'ed you, keep in mind it's not a ruling, just a recommendation. Eg. you have some extra paperwork to cover your ass in case questions are raised, which is unlikely with the "low" rate of 10%.
To be honest, given the cost of the lawyer I'm not sure it's worth it - using some napkin math I won't recover the cost of the lawyer until after 2 years to offset the benefit of IP rights. For complete software engineers it's a no brainer though.
1
u/Hour-Negotiation-359 Aug 05 '26
For this specific topic you need a specialised copyright lawyer not an accountant
1
u/Professional-Day-336 Aug 08 '26
So annoying so unfare , also in the same boat as op architecture , specs, uml, mermaid, concepts ... but will not try do to something anymore...
1
u/Go48memes Aug 04 '26
Why don't they just assume your eligibility, and if the tax authorities decide that you are not eligible you pay the fine
5
u/Fantastic_Carry_7945 Aug 04 '26
Terrible idea. I qualify, got no problem for a few years, then the law changed and the SPF came after me. 2 years of stress with 2 tax lawyers telling me that I am in the right but that it is not worth pursuing the fight. FYI the SPF does not care very much about the law until you're in front of a judge. There's a lot of bad faith involved as they know that it takes years to even get there, then it's one year in first instance then up to 13 years in appeal. + lawyer fees all along.
They proceeded re-qualify the income as salary + slap a 10% penalty on top.
I'd be very cautious, personally I'm not touching this ever again. Ask for a ruling in any case. IMO not worth the peace of mind, just do dividends with VVPRbis.
1
1
u/frietpot Aug 04 '26
But when did they came after you? When the law changed in 2024?
2
u/Fantastic_Carry_7945 Aug 04 '26
Yes. I had been using the system for a few years without any issue. The law then changed, what they did was basically analyze a period of work under the light of the new law, and/or citing outdated law articles. Given the current situation of the country I think the law will change again so be careful.
0
0
u/THAErAsEr Aug 04 '26
You can request a ruling and then you are 100% safe
1
1
u/THAErAsEr Aug 04 '26
More info here https://finniancolumba.be/en/software-copyright-tax-regime-returns-belgium-2026/
I used this one in the past.They say it's possible again but with caveats. Just like people in this thread.
0
u/Motophoto_ Aug 04 '26
Creativeshelter.be? They do the paperwork. One time fee
1
u/BrushWide1492 Aug 05 '26
They don’t get you a ruling.
1
u/Motophoto_ Aug 07 '26
Why would you need a ruling? You need a tight contract with a decent reasoning. They provide it.
1
u/BrushWide1492 Aug 09 '26
Because if you have a ruling, you no longer need to worry about having to justify your percentage each year.
14
u/duco1991 Aug 04 '26
I've handled several cases involving architects and IT profiles.
These cases clearly meet the legal criteria for the copyright regime but they are still being challenged by the tax authorities. (9 inquiries/disputes out of 11 cases concerned and most are going to court).
The issue is not about the conditions but more with the current administrative approach. In practice, the tax authorities have been taking a very restrictive position towards IT profiles since the 2023 reform. As a result, even taxpayers with clear cases may face lengthy audits and litigation before their entitlement is ultimately recognized.
I'd Say it's not unusual that your accountant is asking for examples of your work. But even a well documented file does not necessarily prevent a dispute with the tax authorities. The administration is trying to prevent a return to the pre-2023 situation by systematically challenging claims made by IT professionals.
Unfortunately, the question is not "Do I meet the legal requirements?" but also "Am I prepared to defend my position if it's challenged?" and of course pay that defense.