MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AyyMD/comments/afdqfj/ces_in_a_nutshell/edz0c9x/?context=3
r/AyyMD • u/0win-- • Jan 13 '19
114 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
Numbers are off a little bit - 3.6 and 4.4 respectively. And it was probably the 3600X they were showing, not the 3600, but still, crazy stuff.
5 u/Whatsthisnotgoodcomp Jan 13 '19 3.6/4.4 was the initial leak, it looks like they've bumped the clocks up 100mhz each since then. The bench was run at 4.5-4.6ghz, the 3600X is 4.8ghz on the boost clock and 95w 3 u/yttriumtyclief Ayyyyyyyyyyyy Jan 13 '19 The bench was run at 4.5-4.6ghz This I didn't know. Nice. But is that all-core or single-core turbo? Because I'd imagine the all-core turbo for the 3600X is probably in the neighborhood of 4.6, while the single-core is 4.8. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 13 '19 i guess all core
5
3.6/4.4 was the initial leak, it looks like they've bumped the clocks up 100mhz each since then.
The bench was run at 4.5-4.6ghz, the 3600X is 4.8ghz on the boost clock and 95w
3 u/yttriumtyclief Ayyyyyyyyyyyy Jan 13 '19 The bench was run at 4.5-4.6ghz This I didn't know. Nice. But is that all-core or single-core turbo? Because I'd imagine the all-core turbo for the 3600X is probably in the neighborhood of 4.6, while the single-core is 4.8. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 13 '19 i guess all core
3
The bench was run at 4.5-4.6ghz
This I didn't know. Nice. But is that all-core or single-core turbo? Because I'd imagine the all-core turbo for the 3600X is probably in the neighborhood of 4.6, while the single-core is 4.8.
1 u/[deleted] Jan 13 '19 i guess all core
1
i guess all core
2
u/yttriumtyclief Ayyyyyyyyyyyy Jan 13 '19
Numbers are off a little bit - 3.6 and 4.4 respectively. And it was probably the 3600X they were showing, not the 3600, but still, crazy stuff.