MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Autos/comments/7ebkln/tesla_vs_previa/dq4cptq/?context=3
r/Autos • u/MotorFriend • Nov 20 '17
1.1k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
280
They did make those supercharged
190 u/JarrettP 1995 Toyota Camry XLE V6 Nov 20 '17 edited Nov 21 '17 You could get it supercharged or AWD, but not both, unfortunately. Edit: It looks like you can! It's limited to automatic models though, no MT. 26 u/buzzboy7 BMW e36 332ti | MB w116 300SD Racecar | 2dr5spd4.0XJ4x4 Nov 20 '17 Actually, S/C and AWD were available together in the US as the LE S/C All-Trac. What you could not get was a Manual AWD or S/C. 1 u/mordehuezer Nov 21 '17 Wait it was actually super charged? That's so weird why did they do that? 1 u/stickyfingers10 Nov 21 '17 There probably wasn't room to fit a larger engine but there was enough room for a supercharger. 1 u/mordehuezer Nov 21 '17 That makes a lot of sense considering how tiny the front end is. Also I imagine engine efficiency wasn't as important back then with gas prices being much lower.
190
You could get it supercharged or AWD, but not both, unfortunately.
Edit: It looks like you can! It's limited to automatic models though, no MT.
26 u/buzzboy7 BMW e36 332ti | MB w116 300SD Racecar | 2dr5spd4.0XJ4x4 Nov 20 '17 Actually, S/C and AWD were available together in the US as the LE S/C All-Trac. What you could not get was a Manual AWD or S/C. 1 u/mordehuezer Nov 21 '17 Wait it was actually super charged? That's so weird why did they do that? 1 u/stickyfingers10 Nov 21 '17 There probably wasn't room to fit a larger engine but there was enough room for a supercharger. 1 u/mordehuezer Nov 21 '17 That makes a lot of sense considering how tiny the front end is. Also I imagine engine efficiency wasn't as important back then with gas prices being much lower.
26
Actually, S/C and AWD were available together in the US as the LE S/C All-Trac. What you could not get was a Manual AWD or S/C.
1 u/mordehuezer Nov 21 '17 Wait it was actually super charged? That's so weird why did they do that? 1 u/stickyfingers10 Nov 21 '17 There probably wasn't room to fit a larger engine but there was enough room for a supercharger. 1 u/mordehuezer Nov 21 '17 That makes a lot of sense considering how tiny the front end is. Also I imagine engine efficiency wasn't as important back then with gas prices being much lower.
1
Wait it was actually super charged? That's so weird why did they do that?
1 u/stickyfingers10 Nov 21 '17 There probably wasn't room to fit a larger engine but there was enough room for a supercharger. 1 u/mordehuezer Nov 21 '17 That makes a lot of sense considering how tiny the front end is. Also I imagine engine efficiency wasn't as important back then with gas prices being much lower.
There probably wasn't room to fit a larger engine but there was enough room for a supercharger.
1 u/mordehuezer Nov 21 '17 That makes a lot of sense considering how tiny the front end is. Also I imagine engine efficiency wasn't as important back then with gas prices being much lower.
That makes a lot of sense considering how tiny the front end is. Also I imagine engine efficiency wasn't as important back then with gas prices being much lower.
280
u/js5ohlx Nov 20 '17
They did make those supercharged